Uhm, not too sure about it, but given that WoD was meant to be BC 2.0. Getting 2.0 versions of the BC new races would make sense.
Uhm, not too sure about it, but given that WoD was meant to be BC 2.0. Getting 2.0 versions of the BC new races would make sense.
This is an interesting theory.
Wasn't there also hints at more Void related stuff from the Mythic version of Mar'gok in Highmaul with Cho'Gall showing up at the end?
WoD did seem to feature alot of parallels with BC thematically so perhaps Farahlon would have featured Belfs pursuing the Void as a resource like they were mining Netherstorm in BC? The Alleria arrow, the void infused Orcs in Nargrand which seem identical aesthetically to the void infused broken in Mac'Aree, I think the OP may be on to something. Maybe Mac'Aree is a reworking of what work they were developing for Farahlon?
Another compelling point.
Last edited by ChairmanKaga; 2018-03-01 at 06:19 PM.
I am pretty sure that Farahlon was going to be for more plant creature stuff with hints of massive amounts of arcane power under the surface.
It's possible. Warlords had a ton of cut content.
I think you're right in perhaps they thought of Allied Races. Then again you could argue Races added has always been a thing.
I think maybe they thought of making Allied Races but based on how little Ren'dorei and the Lightforged actually have, I would say those specific races came with the making of legion rather than early as WoD. I would say though that they wanted the Draenor Orcs before all Allied Races in general since yeah, they were a feature people wanted and WoD easily could have given but because the Garrisons was far too ambitious and they really cut so much shit, it never arrived.
If that were the case that must mean that they also meant for Alleria to align herself with the Horde, so it must have been a long time before they actually came up with Legion's story.
Here is something to believe in!
Your examples of "proof" are in fact not proof. It's opinion based on circumstance.
Actual, concrete proof, no it's not.