Page 14 of 17 FirstFirst ...
4
12
13
14
15
16
... LastLast
  1. #261
    Deleted
    look at the bigger picture from blizzard. He is imprisoned. In the history of WoW, how many imprisoned people have remained incarcerated. Its a setup for a future expansion, shortfall of content. They can just say something along the lines of "illidian got bored and took a walk, sargeras walked out"

  2. #262
    Quote Originally Posted by JustRob View Post
    Yeah okay but you know what I mean. At least we fought him. I would have been perfectly fine with the Pantheon imprisoning / killing Sargeras, if only we just got to fight him for a little bit.
    But it is a massive difference between an old god corrupted dragon and an actual planet sized titan. The reason we fight Argus the size that he is, is mostly because the seat does "shrink" down their bodies, you can see it happen to Sargeras during the final cinematic.

  3. #263
    Quote Originally Posted by Netherspark View Post
    But we fought and killed two other Titans.

    And also Blizzard should have explained what the deal with the titans is - how they're still alive and so powerful, why they are all so small now, whether they are actually living planets as Chronicles suggested or just ethereal souls like they seem to be in game.
    Aggramar and the rest of the pantheon were already killed by Sargeras, because they are beings of pure arcane borne from planets (read: world souls), and fel beats arcane in magic paper scissors. Norgannon managed to save their essences at the last second as their forms were being destroyed by a massive felstorm. Those essences fled around the universe, and the premise of Antorus, The Burning Throne is that Sargeras is almost done finding those remnants and has begun torturing the titans essences into submission, Aggramar having been prime example. The reason we fight Aggramar is that he's a shadow of his former self; the entire pantheon is as well, not to mention having come fresh from titan torture camp. Argus? He's been being drained to power the legions infinite armies, obviously that leaves people a bit weakened.

    TL;DR Titans already died once, pantheon we see is reborn titans that are missing portions of their power (and have an intrinsic weakness to fel). Argus we see is drained and damaged from being a Legion battery.
    Quote Originally Posted by BlizzardCS
    We're aware that some players are experiencing latency and server stability issues, and are investigating. Thanks for your patience.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kena Lea
    @BlizzardCS not being able to connect to anything is a bit beyond latency dear.

  4. #264
    Quote Originally Posted by Soulfighter101 View Post
    Aggramar and the rest of the pantheon were already killed by Sargeras, because they are beings of pure arcane borne from planets (read: world souls), and fel beats arcane in magic paper scissors. Norgannon managed to save their essences at the last second as their forms were being destroyed by a massive felstorm. Those essences fled around the universe, and the premise of Antorus, The Burning Throne is that Sargeras is almost done finding those remnants and has begun torturing the titans essences into submission, Aggramar having been prime example. The reason we fight Aggramar is that he's a shadow of his former self; the entire pantheon is as well, not to mention having come fresh from titan torture camp. Argus? He's been being drained to power the legions infinite armies, obviously that leaves people a bit weakened.

    TL;DR Titans already died once, pantheon we see is reborn titans that are missing portions of their power (and have an intrinsic weakness to fel). Argus we see is drained and damaged from being a Legion battery.
    You've put that very well. There's lots of people going around complaining about us being too strong cause we "killed a Titan" or complaining that we didn't get to fight Sargeras. There were a lot, A LOT, of extenuating circumstances that brought Aggramar and Argus down to a level we could compete with, even with a lot of help. There were no such things for Sargeras himself.
    The most difficult thing to do is accept that there is nothing wrong with things you don't like and accept that people can like things you don't.

  5. #265
    Deleted
    Good luck facing off vs a titan larger then the planet itself...

    I'm intrigued how you'd plan it out....4 wings? Start at his left big toe larger then orgrimmar itself?

    We defeated an corrupted Avatar of Aggramar and a new born baby Titan. He would have 1 shot us without question.

    Sargeras will be back when the void lords come knocking on our door. His soul perpose in the WoW universe is to stop the void.

  6. #266
    Deleted
    No it is not. We are not supose to fight a titan. We should not be able to be even close to him, He can cleave planets, We on the other hand, just like the start of every pokemon season will soon take 10 sec to kill a fucking bear or a wolf. We should not be able to fist fight a titan

  7. #267
    Quote Originally Posted by JustRob View Post
    At least we fought Deathwing and finished him off. Cataclysm would have been fucking stupid if it ended with Thrall Kamehameha'ing Deathwing.
    Which it did. Our contribution to killing Deathwing was prying his armour off and generally being a nuisance to him while Thrall did all actual damage.

  8. #268
    Quote Originally Posted by UnluckyAmateur View Post
    archimonde and Kil'Jaeden aren't cosmic level beings that can cut planets in half when they feel like it.

    It's legit like saying "How come we haven't fought Galactus yet? We already beat Venom and Sabertooth!"
    That comment is pointless, because we killed Argus, who was casting End of All things -> which probably could destroy whole galaxy/universe/whatever.

  9. #269
    Quote Originally Posted by Alteiry View Post
    Sargeras, I've come to bargain.
    Can`t believe no1 picked up this easter egg. I lold so hard.

  10. #270
    Quote Originally Posted by Eazy View Post
    That comment is pointless, because we killed Argus, who was casting End of All things -> which probably could destroy whole galaxy/universe/whatever.
    Considering it doesn't even kill the Titans standing 50 feet from him I doubt its effect was much more than "kill the mortals right in front of him." People really hype up Argus WAY too much because of his nickname.
    The most difficult thing to do is accept that there is nothing wrong with things you don't like and accept that people can like things you don't.

  11. #271
    Quote Originally Posted by cparle87 View Post
    Considering it doesn't even kill the Titans standing 50 feet from him I doubt its effect was much more than "kill the mortals right in front of him." People really hype up Argus WAY too much because of his nickname.
    Not really, because it didn't happen, we stopped him.

  12. #272
    Scarab Lord
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    One path
    Posts
    4,907
    Quote Originally Posted by huth View Post
    Which it did. Our contribution to killing Deathwing was prying his armour off and generally being a nuisance to him while Thrall did all actual damage.
    And it allowed for some interesting fights and mechanics compared to the generic formula, run of the mill tank and spanks.

    Would you rather encounter and engage Sargeras in some kind of fight or not at all?
    If you knew the candle was fire then the meal was cooked a long time ago.

  13. #273
    Quote Originally Posted by Eazy View Post
    Not really, because it didn't happen, we stopped him.
    Next time you wipe on the fight take a look around at the Titans. They weren't touched by his spell. I doubt a spell that doesn't extent 50 ft will destroy the universe. =-)
    The most difficult thing to do is accept that there is nothing wrong with things you don't like and accept that people can like things you don't.

  14. #274
    Quote Originally Posted by cparle87 View Post
    Next time you wipe on the fight take a look around at the Titans. They weren't touched by his spell. I doubt a spell that doesn't extent 50 ft will destroy the universe. =-)
    Mate, we stopped him before he casted that thing. I'm not talking about that scythe phase where he kill us all.

  15. #275
    Quote Originally Posted by Eazy View Post
    Mate, we stopped him before he casted that thing. I'm not talking about that scythe phase where he kill us all.
    Neither am I. I'm talking about the big ass cast he begins casting after he kills us that we interrupt once we're alive again. Isn't that the 'end of all things' you were referring to? If you ever actually wipe on it (my guild embarrassingly did once because we all assumed someone else was going to stop it) you'll notice it doesn't have the range to even hit the Titans in their chairs.
    The most difficult thing to do is accept that there is nothing wrong with things you don't like and accept that people can like things you don't.

  16. #276
    Quote Originally Posted by cparle87 View Post
    Neither am I. I'm talking about the big ass cast he begins casting after he kills us that we interrupt once we're alive again. Isn't that the 'end of all things' you were referring to? If you ever actually wipe on it (my guild embarrassingly did once because we all assumed someone else was going to stop it) you'll notice it doesn't have the range to even hit the Titans in their chairs.
    lore =/= gameplay

  17. #277
    Quote Originally Posted by Narveid View Post
    Weren't you warned several times not to make threads like this?

    And I think it was a cool ending to a decent expansion, too bad you didn't like it.
    Oh look it's the forum police!

  18. #278
    Quote Originally Posted by Eazy View Post
    lore =/= gameplay
    But assuming that his spell has infinite range and will exterminate the universe somehow makes sense? How many enemies had horrible titles, the annihilator, the breaker, the destroyer, etc? People are inserting WAY too much headcanon into this. It took Sargeras 10,000 years to travel to Azeroth the old fashioned way.
    The most difficult thing to do is accept that there is nothing wrong with things you don't like and accept that people can like things you don't.

  19. #279
    Edit: you two are fast When I started typing this, Eazy's post was the last one in this thread.

    Quote Originally Posted by Eazy View Post
    Mate, we stopped him before he casted that thing. I'm not talking about that scythe phase where he kill us all.
    "End of All Things" is what he was talking about, though, not the scythe phase. If you just ignore EoAT and let him finish casting it, look around before the encounter ends: all of us will die, but the Titans will still be around, the Seat of the Pantheon will still be around, Azeroth and Sargeras' cloud (presumably even Sargeras himself) will still be around. That might show that the spell either isn't as destructive as the characters hyped it up, or has a very limited range - either way, it didn't seem like EoAT actually end everything at all. You can check it in game, or have a look at this clip.

    Personally, I'm skeptical about the whole thing. We are essentially discussing about a game-mechanic based on in-game characters' opinions (which is subjected to being wrong), so in-game stuffs need to be taken into account. However, how far should it go? Which in-game things should we take to be canon? One, like @cparle87, may claim that the Titans, Azeroth and everything that would still be existing before the encounter ends is the proof the spell isn't literally the end of all things. Another may say that it was just Blizzard forgot or being too lazy to create an entire new skybox for ~3s of an encounter. Then again, one may say that if Blizzard wanted to portray EoAT to be as deadly as it was, they could always go with the Cataclysm way - having everything fade into black, implying that there isn't anything left for us. I don't think it'll be easy for people to reach a conclusion that way, if we will ever reach one at all without any input from sources outside of in-game mechanics (i.e: novels, interviews, etc.).

    Game-mechanic asides, lore-wise, I do think it seems a bit illogical for EoAT to be able to destroy everything in the universe. Sure, maybe it doesn't use raw destructive power (since none of the Titans, including Sargeras, has shown capability anywhere near that level), but some other mechanics (i.e: affecting reality's integrity like the Scepter of Sargeras, or drain the life of everything affected) instead. However, would Sargeras really want to keep something that can kill him or Azeroth at any moment around? Or leave him unattended after helping him to wake up? That doesn't sound right, so I assume that EoAT can kill everything, but it either isn't absolute (can be resisted / countered if the affected targets are powerful enough, for example - which would make sense going by how WoW abilities work lore-wise) or has a rather limited range. I can very well be wrong, though.
    Last edited by Qualia; 2018-03-12 at 01:49 PM.
    Je veux le sang, sang, sang, et sang
    Donnons le sang de guillotine
    Pour guerir la secheresse de la guillotine
    Je veux le sang, sang, sang, et sang.

  20. #280
    Quote Originally Posted by Qualia View Post
    Edit: you two are fast When I started typing this, Eazy's post was the last one in this thread.


    "End of All Things" is what he was talking about, though, not the scythe phase. If you just ignore EoAT and let him finish casting it, look around before the encounter ends: all of us will die, but the Titans will still be around, the Seat of the Pantheon will still be around, Azeroth and Sargeras' cloud (presumably even Sargeras himself) will still be around. That might show that the spell either isn't as destructive as the characters hyped it up, or has a very limited range - either way, it didn't seem like EoAT actually end everything at all. You can check it in game, or have a look at this clip.

    Personally, I'm skeptical about the whole thing. We are essentially discussing about a game-mechanic based on in-game characters' opinions (which is subjected to being wrong), so in-game stuffs need to be taken into account. However, how far should it go? Which in-game things should we take to be canon? One, like @cparle87, may claim that the Titans, Azeroth and everything that would still be existing before the encounter ends is the proof the spell isn't literally the end of all things. Another may say that it was just Blizzard forgot or being too lazy to create an entire new skybox for ~3s of an encounter. Then again, one may say that if Blizzard wanted to portray EoAT to be as deadly as it was, they could always go with the Cataclysm way - having everything fade into black, implying that there isn't anything left for us. I don't think it'll be easy for people to reach a conclusion that way, if we will ever reach one at all without any input from sources outside of in-game mechanics (i.e: novels, interviews, etc.).

    Game-mechanic asides, lore-wise, I do think it seems a bit illogical for EoAT to be able to destroy everything in the universe. Sure, maybe it doesn't use raw destructive power (since none of the Titans, including Sargeras, has shown capability anywhere near that level), but some other mechanics (i.e: affecting reality's integrity like the Scepter of Sargeras, or drain the life of everything affected) instead. However, would Sargeras really want to keep something that can kill him or Azeroth at any moment around? Or leave him unattended after helping him to wake up? That doesn't sound right, so I assume that EoAT can kill everything, but it either isn't absolute (can be resisted / countered if the affected targets are powerful enough, for example - which would make sense going by how WoW abilities work lore-wise) or has a rather limited range. I can very well be wrong, though.
    Took the words right out of my mouth. I've seen this argument made before about Argus' relative power level, but I don't think anyone has ever put it as well as you did.
    The most difficult thing to do is accept that there is nothing wrong with things you don't like and accept that people can like things you don't.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •