No, taking all the wealth and giving it to poor people hurts the incentive to produce over time. If the most redistributive societies were the most creative and prosperous all those economies would be growing faster than low tax societies.
The West already gives aid to third world countries. Giving too much and in the wrong sectors will actually cripple their economies, there has to be a lot discipline to make sure it's not making them dependent. The last thing a country wants is to be reliant on retail sales based on foreign aid.
My god. I'm currently saving for a new car and a new PC. He could just give me a million or 2. Wouldn't hurt him a bit.
If that's the case I misunderstood. Usually when the discussion involving wealth inequality turns up the conversation revolves around tax increases on the ultra wealthy so that others may prosper through increased social programs.
Dealing with the general public while smiling and resisting the urge to punch someone in the face is a skill in itself.
An actual electrician is a skilled job -- a handy man is not in most cases. An electrician charges a higher fee for their services than a handy man. Guess who a majority of people end up hiring?
Last edited by Captain N; 2018-03-12 at 10:35 PM.
“You're not to be so blind with patriotism that you can't face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it or says it.”― Malcolm X
I watch them fight and die in the name of freedom. They speak of liberty and justice, but for whom? -Ratonhnhaké:ton (Connor Kenway)
Did you see that fantastic cartoon right after he bought the Washington Post a few years ago? "Honey, where did you go?". "I just went out and got the paper." He might be an asshole to work for, but he goes good things.
- - - Updated - - -
No, it doesn't. It actually creates more productive people because everyone's basic needs are met. Healthier, too. Happier, as well. I could go on.
Let's see - $1.4 Trillion? I'll buy 20 years of Congress and President elections - and then have them legislate my ideas into law.
I can throw $400 Billion at the Presidential race, and $2.8 billion at EACH Congressional race (535 total). That should get me full control for at least 10 years.
Fix everything.
Uhm..they do. Most countries with low taxes are developing countries and they can certainly do an impressive spurt...proportionally. THE entire western Europe does a fairly good job (or did) at redistributing wealth. THe US does a reasonable job at this. Almost the entire developing world does not and this is why they are the developing world.
No infrastructure and no social mobility is a recipe for doom. When you have geniuses plowing fields because that is what their family does you are basically screwed as a country.
Yes it does. Everything that is part of your job is a skill. Including working in a store. Working the register, dealing with customers, handling the products, organizing, cleaning, dealing with the stress and dehumanization service workers are often subjected to etc. etc.
- - - Updated - - -
Returning what was stolen does not make dependent. All the first world countries built themselves up by plundering the rest of the world. England financed their industry by looting India for example.
Yeah I agree that welfare increases productivity when it comes to basic needs. That's why I like the US system because it doesn't give people any non-essential luxuries.
You're proving my point. Low tax places are growing compared to Western Europe, which is close to stagnation.
Yeah, I have heard with smaller companies their internal business practices are borderline shady. But it could just be prioritization laziness.
I had a friend that worked there for four years, and he basically let me in on things that were just baffling to me. For instance, they basically have 14 tiers or levels of employment. And this is all respective of pay grade essentially. And whatever tier you are hired in at (level one was like warehouse or mailroom level, level fourteen would be execs under Bezos's team), that was essentially the tier you would stay at unless you were basically willing to spend every waking minute working. He had a son and was only able to put in 50 hours a week and, while he had favorable reviews and small bumps in pay, he stayed at that level his entire time at the company. They basically made it clear unless he was putting in 80+ hours not to expect to advance.
To me, that kind of culture is absolutely insane. My understanding is that Google is very similar.
People working 2 jobs in the US (at least one part-time) - 7.8 Million (Roughly 4.9% of the workforce)
People working 2 full-time jobs in the US - 360,000 (0.2% of the workforce)
Average time worked weekly by the US Workforce - 34.5 hours
Those are called competency.
Skill, in labor, is a measure. Which translates into value.