You mean like how the Forsaken should probably steamroll most of the Alliance, like the Scourge did? Or how Sylvanas the Banshee Queen keeps forgetting she's a banshee?
Lazy writing is everywhere, but bias writing tends to favor the Alliance more. Something you seem to never have a problem with.
Not sure that's true. Nathanos merely says that many on the Council have issues with that Sylvanas is doing. Many. But it's a Council, which implies there are likely quite a few viewpoints represented. Some might be pro-necromancy. Some might be against it. They might argue about it constantly and never shut up.
Because Blizzard goes back and forth here a lot. We have explicit Word of God that Forsaken all are completely free-willed. Then we have in game scenes where alliance soldiers are brought back and immediately begin praising Sylvanas. We have an explanation for that which is also kind of inconsistent in what it means or how it's applied.
Then we also have Word of God that newly raised Forsaken are given the choice of swearing allegiance to Sylvanas or being put back in the ground, which means while they're free willed in a literal sense, it's a little dubious to call freedom their 'shtick'. Except sometimes that's not true either.
Basically, sometimes the Forsaken are painted with shades of the Scourge. Sometimes they celebrate their individuality and freedom after breaking free of the Lich King's hold as the most important thing and sometimes they're entirely defined by Sylvanas, whose rule in and of itself varies in portrayal from benevolent but pragmatic cult of personality to iron fisted dictatorship.
It makes talking about the Forsaken kinda hard because everyone has an example they can pull out from somewhere in the game that matches their personal headcanon.
Doesn't help that development cycles are so slow which makes trying to figure out how it actually pieces together sort of a pain.
Sylvanas's long-term absence left a power vacuum in Undercity, so it's only natural the people there would conjure a system in its place to give the city some structure. The longer it's in place the more it gains support from the general population. When a notable portion the populace prefers it over Sylvanas's reign she can't just disband it and expect no repercussions. The Forsaken have been happy to have Sylvanas as a queen, not as a tyrant.
This could be good development for the Forsaken, shifting their focus from Sylvanas's cult of personality to an actual nation of people. I don't appreciate the council's disinterest in searching for longevity, but it could be a matter of growing pains. Once the Forsaken have set down roots to a new land (assuming they won't return to Lordaeron) their development can go in any direction.
Now you see it. Now you don't.
But was where Dalaran?
Undead army, abominations.
Horde has had airships before the Alliance. But easy counter to that, raise wyverns.no airships
Necromancers, banshees, undead mages. People who had no power in life can develop magical powers in death(Godfrey used necromancy after becoming forsaken)no strong magical units
They literally are a smaller Scourge with the benefits of individuals becoming more powerful than ghouls. They were neutered in WoW, but playing Frozen Throne, they have everything the Scourge does.They have literally just the plague.
A good example of this neutering? Sylvanas is the Banshee Queen, yet she for some reason isn't allowed to Banshee because... you know she'd be too op.
Banshee's can mute magic users, possess powerful people including even Val'kyr and have necromantic powers.
Last edited by MikeBogina; 2018-03-13 at 07:19 PM.
That was mere gameplay. They were never meant to have literal WC3 necromancers, plague of undeath or the ability to endlessly resurrect fallen enemies to use them as cannon fodder and these are the major aspects that made the Scourge the unstoppable juggernaut it was.
The only real advantage the Forsaken have compared to the Scourge is free will: they can individually learn skills and behave as a working society.
Sylvanas has a desolate vagina and a barren womb. Just sayin'.
That can be ripped apart by Worgen with their bare claws.
Yeah, but the Forsaken themselves have none.Horde has had airships before the Alliance. But easy counter to that, raise wyverns.
We don't know if Godfrey had magical powers in Life, so its speculation on your side. Otherwise there are only individual banshees shown in the game and not a big force of them and we have outside of a hand full val'kyr only one necromancer in the Forsaken. They have Mages but Humans have them as well and if we look at ingame representation, humans seem to be inheritly better as they tend to provide a significant portion of magical force in most conflicts. In Legion for example it was the human Kirin Tor who had to provide the magical force and the magical order to fight the Legion as neither Blood Elves nor Forsaken had any organisations to fullfill this role.Necromancers, banshees, undead mages. People who had no power in life can develop magical powers in death(Godfrey used necromancy after becoming forsaken)
Nope, they have not. Outside of Monstrosities, they lack any of the units that make the Scourge such a strong force. They don't have many necromancers, they don't have abominations, they don't have countless numbers of ghouls, Lichs, Frostwyrms. There may be Death Knights that join the Forsaken but those are in the Alliance as well, so the strongest Scourge Elite Force that they got is probably represented in roughly equal numbers in the alliance. And if we would go for WC3, the Paladins of the Alliance, no further filled with Draenei, Dwarfen and Lightforged Paladins that were not there back in wc3 would simply annihilate the Forsaken forces through Holy Light. Its in fact the users of the Holy Light who were neutered in WoW.They literally are a smaller Scourge with the benefits of individuals becoming more powerful than ghouls. They were neutered in WoW, but playing Frozen Throne, they have everything the Scourge does.
Another example of neutering? Paladins could mass rezz 6 dead people permanently to full live back in WC3. Imagine if the Paladins still could do that. It would be effectively cockblock the Val'kyr, because what they can do, Paladins could simply do better, while burning their enemies to crisp. Not to forget how Dispell Magic was stripped from Priest.A good example of this neutering? Sylvanas is the Banshee Queen, yet she for some reason isn't allowed to Banshee because... you know she'd be too op.
Banshee's can mute magic users, possess powerful people including even Val'kyr and have necromantic powers.
She is already a huge hypocrite for the whole "what are we if not slaves to this torment" and then proceeding to inflict the same uppon others.
It's like Garrosh (and the Horde lately) saying "live by these words, victory or death" and then running away from a battle with neither. What's one more hypocrisy?
Considered the Horde, alongside all the other forces opposing it, indeed claimed victory over Legion your complaint about "muh hypocrisy" is moot. People seem to understand jackshit of Orc history and clearly doesn't understand that never the Horde ran into a guaranteed suicide. If a battle cannot be won then you lead your forces away and save your troops for when they'll be able to truly make a difference.
This idea that "Victory or death" is the same thing as blindly fighting no matter what is nothing but shitty headcanon.