2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
Google the richest people in the world. Only a small fraction of them inherited their billion(s) and sit on their wealth. New money now beats old money and that trend will accelerate as long as technology advances. If society stagnates in the future then it would go back to old money dominating.
I take comfort in knowing that 5 people every decade will become obscenely wealthy.
As far as the rest of the market, it gets squashed by those 5 people. This new money you talk of tends to do everything in its power not to out compete competitors, because that would actually cut into their bottom line. No, they just use their enormous political sway and influence to squish everyone else.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
New money constantly tries to outcompete competitors. Everyone does that, it's simply that new money did it better more recently.
That's good if they work in their own rational interest. Of course it's bad if they use the government to give them special treatment. That's a big challenge in our two party system, a Democrat may favor a solar company, a Republican may favor an oil company. Getting a 100% unbiased market is difficult or impossible, but the current market is not so stifling that a shitty big business can't fail and that new startups can't succeed.
In a case like Google they straight up buy out all their competitors and they don't even care that much about getting a good deal. That's bad for ambitious startups but it's not that big of a deal overall. So long as they keep plowing money into expansion, research, development, and moonshots they still deserve to be the industry leader.
Last edited by PC2; 2018-03-14 at 09:02 PM.
That's not what I said. In the early days they did not charge state sales tax on purchases online. This added to charging less at the expense of company profits allowed them to build a competitive advantage at the expense of local businesses. Without that they might not have become the business they are today.
And it also helps that they've always been perfectly willing to dodge other forms of taxation and exploit their workers.