And? You have to somehow prove that Bwonsamdi was the one who single-handely wanted Sylvanas to be Warchief. So far, we have "spirits" spoken in plural, we don't even know if Bwonsamdi had a hand in that or no. Vol'jin having a stronger connection to Bwonsamdi means little since he pretty much earned the favor of all Loa and surely is not Bwonsamdi directly granting Vol'jin abilities. Plus, if you would have read Shadows of the Horde you would know that Bwonsamdi may be a prick but he's no villain whatsoever, that's the whole point as for why Vol'jin even care about earning his favor. And if you think Bwonsamdi's fetish for death and souls is a good argument, his spoken distaste for undead is just as good.
On the end of the day, Vol'jin was indeed granted a vision by the Loa like they did several times in the past, both to him and his father Sen'jin. But somehow you want it to be "different" this time because "muh Sylvanas" is involved.
Thing is Vol'jin would never blindly follow what Loa "commanded" if he himself doesn't see benefit the action in question would bring to the Horde. Considering he's not an idiot I find notion of him being somehow tricked hardly believable.
It could be that all this stirring the pot with Saurfang and Sylvanas is just playing to Vol'jin's "many will not understand" statement he made when giving the title to Sylvanas. It could still be that Sylvanas is somehow important regarding some grand scheme we're not seeing yet.
Last edited by Aucald; 2018-03-16 at 12:39 AM.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Nothing blizzard writes has to make sense.
Hell, nothing blizzard writes MAKES sense.
Seems that Voljin was "trolling" the Horde...
Vol'Jin - "The spirits have granted me clarity. A vision, they whisper a name. Many will not understand, but you must step out of the shadows and lead. You must be Warchief."
Spirts - "NO NO, dammit when we said Windrunner we meant Alleria to bring peace with the Alliance - JESUS CHRIST why did you think we'd make Sylvanas Warchief?"
Vol'Jin's ghost - "OOOOOoohhhhh shazbot"
BASIC CAMPFIRE for WARCHIEF UK Prime Minister!
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Bwonsamdi has literally raised the dead to fight for him before. It was actually in his very first appearance, and he used them to take Zalazane. The Troll dead are his, so he doesn't like it when they're stolen from him. However, he's just fine with undead that work for him.
If you look at Bwonsamdi himself, and all the spirits that work for him, it's literally impossible for him to hate all undead. He is undead.
I would probably agree - Bwonsamdi in Nazmir is big on making deals, your entire interaction with him is foisted on a deal you make to send him the souls of a million Blood Trolls in exchange for his loyalty to your and Talanji's efforts - so he likely considers a Forsaken PC just fine because they're obviously on his side and willing to make a deal. The undead created by G'huun and his Faceless priests in Nazmir are opposed and actively trying to kill him - so he's no doubt antagonistic to them, especially since many of them are being made from the sacrifices previously offered to him that litter the grounds of his temple-complex.
I don't know if you would call Bwonsamdi undead himself, though - he's a spirit demigod, and his appearance is essentially a choice on his part.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead