I always felt "I could care less" had a bit of implied sarcasm. If the intent is understood I don't see the problem.
"Those who dance appear insane to those who can't hear the music." ~~ George Carlin
I could care less =I don't give a fuck
No, it really doesn't work.
Couldn't care less = You care as little as possible = You pretty much don't care at all.
Could care less = You care, but not as little as possible = You don't hate it as there are things you could care less about.
They are NOT the same thing at all and 'could care less' is almost always used inappropriately.
Think about it .... you can do it .... but if you still don't get it .... then i couldn't care less :-P
"Take the time to sit down and talk with your adversaries. You will learn something, and they will learn something from you. When two enemies are talking, they are not fighting. It's when the talking ceases that the ground becomes fertile for violence. So keep the conversation going."
~ Daryl Davis
"Take the time to sit down and talk with your adversaries. You will learn something, and they will learn something from you. When two enemies are talking, they are not fighting. It's when the talking ceases that the ground becomes fertile for violence. So keep the conversation going."
~ Daryl Davis
when we can fill our cars with road asphalt or petroleum jelly, then there might be confusion.
but 99.99999% of the time when someone says i need to get some petrol we all know it means for the car.
- - - Updated - - -
or i could give less rats asses lol.
God British people are annoying
Hello. I created an account when I read this, as I've noted a couple other people before you commenting on "should of." I've only been doing WoW for less than a year over the past few years, so I wouldn't normally feel comfortable posting in a forum like this, but I have to tell you, it isn't "should of." It's "should've." The contraction for "should have" is "should've." Because of most American accents it just sounds like "should of." I admit some people use "should of," which is terrible and wrong, but most of us are saying "should've," I think.
Also, "y'all" used to bug the crap out of me, but now I live near Texas and it's starting to grow on me. It's incredibly useful for referring to a group of people (second person plural). I used to use "you guys" or "your company" or "your office" and so on. But "y'all" takes care of that nicely. It's no different than "they'll" in my opinion (as in "they'll get you if you're rolling dirty").
No, it's not.
No, we shouldn't. It sounds stupid to you, but your opinion is largely irrelevant. "Aluminum" has been used in the US since the late 1800's. As far as sounding stupid, considering that the guy that named it chose "aluminum" before settling on "aluminium" because it sounded "classier", I'd argue that the extra syllable has no value whatsoever in modern vernacular.
No, it doesn't. The person saying it may intend for it mean the same, but it doesn't actually mean the same thing.
To a degree, sure. But words having meanings. A person doesn't get to just change the meaning of a word because it suits their ignorance. "Could" and "couldn't" are literal opposites. They can't mean the same thing. The same applies to the misuse of "literally", a word cannot be its own antonym.
This is like saying the color of a car is more important than if the engine works.
Which is worse. "U" generally only makes a "yew" sound when describing the letter alone or when it's the first letter of a word (eg, use).
What if I want to be a sock puppet, any advice for us? How would I white knight for my other account with other low post count accounts?
I'm also thinking context matters.
- Could be a generational thing as well. Younger people might be less offended than older generations. These young guys are so edgey nothing offends them.
- Location, location, location. This drag would be less effective in Britain than abroad. For a person that has rarely traveled and has always been surrounded by other like speakers,, they have less reference for this joke.