Nope it has not been. Hell the argument started with my opinion about alliance attack on the sunwell. You have by now made it about the blood elves pov :S. And the last few post where just about the word proof :P.
You have said: the blood elves have no reason to trust the alliance. You never used the word POV. you did say things like why should the trust them etc.
But you never said from the ingame perspective for the blood elves. You have given their reactions etc. It does make some things more clear ( on your way of thinking).
I clearly stated i am not a timelord or have a bird of prey and spock for calculating the course.
Lol, my opinion ( or theory) is based upon previous similar situations. That is called a precedent . It can be used as proof. Look it up in a dictionary or Wikipedia or something.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precedent
A precedent ( again i do not know the correct version of the word) can be used to proof that similar situation can happen. Or how the response was in previous similar situations.
any act, decision, or case that serves as a guide or justification for subsequent situations. from:
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/precedents
proof:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_(truth)
In most disciplines, evidence is required to prove something. Evidence is drawn from experience of the world around us, with science obtaining its evidence from nature,[11] law obtaining its evidence from witnesses and forensic investigation,[12] and so on.
so for my proof i need:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence
So again i have proven that my opinion can be right. And previous situations can be used as evidence on the behavior pattern of the alliance. And i have given facts that they did not abuse them. How do i know they are facts? Because if they did use them we would have seen it ingame. It would be on wowpedia or it would be in quests on wowhead.
see you 2morrow.