Moonlight was better than La La Land, thanks for reading this
Moonlight was better than La La Land, thanks for reading this
Movie was a bit eh for me, felt like it wasn't a movie in itself rather it exists just to set up the incoming half dozen sequels. Not good, not bad I rate it about average. Not something I'll be like ooh I want to watch again, but if there is nothing on and I stumble across it I'll watch it.
I enjoyed it. It was really different from the first film. But the girl really played Lara well.
Kom graun, oso na graun op. Kom folau, oso na gyon op.
#IStandWithGinaCarano
Just saw the movie and really liked it. The cheesy plot and over the top side characters were a bit grating, but that was more than made up by Vikander's performance. She made for a much more credible action hero than I would have ever thought, because they gave her a lot to do physically but never tried to portray her as some kind of ultimate badass, and that all made for a more believable and interesting movie.
Its a silly argument because Leo didnt need an Oscar for people to appreciate his talent. He did that with his break out role in whats eating gilberts grape where he did also get Oscar buzz.
And his role in the mega successful titanic guaranteed him future gigs
Alicia Vikander was terrible. No idea how she even won an Oscar previously as her acting is quite average and at times very wooden. Not that winning one means much. Plenty of average actors have won before like Lawrence and Halle Berry.
But this is Tomb Raider. I get that it is more about over the top action than anything. She still didn't seem right for the role though. Too small and looked very out of place in it. Did the best to carry the weight of it and collapsed. Action wise it was decent though. JMO and I stand by it.
She also played a good robot in ex machina. Shes a fine actress
I'm not sure why we're dancing around when we're essentially saying the same thing. I'm only adding the fact that obtaining one does not negatively impact your career, it either does nothing or improves it. In Leo's case it did nothing since as you said, he didn't need it; he is already an incredible actor. On the other hand, Vikander getting one would help alittle at least, since she's newer on the scene. You can't tell me that her getting an Oscar would somehow make her an unpopular hire because of it...
How is this 10 pages? Some people liked it and are arguing?
Can't even fathom tbh, it was a terrible movie and the female human from Earth (totally pc, for you that insist.) that acted as Lara Croft was B-rate at best. On par with Warcraft. I would have preferred to have wasted my time watching a 90's graphic animation Tomb Raider movie.
And that's exactly how it reaches 10 pages :P because some people thought it was a terrible movie, some thought it was okay, some thought it was great. We also have everything from "Alicia Vikander played Lara excellently" to "why did they choose some random horrible actress to take over Jolie as Lara???".
Most importantly, we have a ton of bored people at work/school willing to toss around their respective opinions.
I thought it was a meh, occasionally fun movie that was carried by Vikander. I thought she did a great job and she obviously worked hard to do a lot of the stunts/action shots herself, which I can always respect.
Also, (my primary hobby being rock climbing) her choosing to climb up that cliff as the immediate solution to the assisting rope being pulled up just turns me on so, SO much.
I also admit I had zero expectations going in since I never liked Angelina Jolie and didn't play much of the Tomb Raider games, so there was little incentive for me to watch the previous installations.
I don't know, she looks too girly for my liking. It's the same problem I have with Rey..