Demanding civilian complacency with the police state, regardless of rights. You know...the definition of auttoritatianism (though I’m sure you’re more used to the “woman hurt my feelings on the internet non-definition).
I don’t particularly care if they’re innocent or not. That’s irrelevant when discussing rights.Resisting arrest is not the proper way to get justice and most of those resisting and getting shot are not innocent anyway. Why do you encourage this?
Yes, because the courts NEVER let the police get away with literal murder.If you think you have been mistreated, take it up in court. Sue the crap out of the officer, but don't threaten him.
Subduing local, lightly armed insurgencies has actually proven pretty difficult for modern militaries. It's kind of weird to claim otherwise.
The United States has a murder problem, but there's not a good reason to believe it's tied to firearms ownership. Worldwide, there is no correlation between firearms ownership and homicide (link).
RIP Genn Greymane, Permabanned on 8.22.18
Your name will carry on through generations, and will never be forgotten.
Directly quoting you.
- - - Updated - - -
So if you're done with your rambling, I refer you back to my original comments.
You have concealed carry in every state. Your idea of "strict gun laws" is what any other country would consider extremely weak gun laws. This is a "just you" problem.
But there are all sorts of practical restrictions on our freedom of thought due to various social norms, traditions, and unwritten rules that people take even more seriously than the law. No one would be caught dead espousing the view that, say, men should all stay home and raise children while women do all of the work, it is just one of those things that is dismissed out of hand without being given a moment's consideration. This is categorically NOT how we treat racism or bigotry, and to an extent those ideas are still accepted or even encouraged by society despite the fact that we all on some level know them to be wrong. Freedom is hardly an obstacle to building a better and more harmonious society, if anything it's our unwillingness to exercise our freedom of thought and really challenge hateful ideas that is holding us back.
There are multiple things that would need to happen. Perhaps the biggest is the inherit racism involved by virtue of our suburbs.
By creating this separation, it becomes substantially easier to create the us vs them dichotomy. I don't see any issues where I am, so if there are issues over there, it must be because it is "them" who are obviously bad people and deserve what they get. You see this play out all the time in our media where they will look hard to find any character flaws in someone treated (or killed) unfairly as well as try to push the narrative that the bad cop or white killer is mentally ill and/or the exception (that seems to happen quite often).
Another big factor that keeps America from being as empathetic as it should be is the rising tide of Christian evangelism; something media continues to support as well. These groups are inexorably pushing towards theocracy (tbh, any flavor of authoritarianism would be fine in their book) , and it is filled with racism, misogyny, and intolerance for any non-Christian religion (as well as many Christian denominations).
https://chrisstroop.com/2018/03/14/t...is-not-a-hero/
I think white Evangelicals should have to own all of the white supremacist patriarchal horrors they have unleashed throughout American history, and all of the horrors they are unleashing in the present under their Trump regime. No amount of rebranding should be adequate to “save” their movement. If we are to survive as a democracy, we need to reduce their influence as much as possible, as quickly as possible, because, make no mistake, this is not a religious group that ultimately respects the rule of law. These are fundamentalists, driven at base by a need for power and control. They want to dominate. The media should not help them achieve that goal by normalizing them.
With poverty comes crime. With crimes comes violence. FIX the poverty and you shall see alot of problems vanish. But no, it is widely accepted that you have millions full time jobs that does not provide a living wage. But people over there are so selfish, imagine if they should have to pay what actualy costs. OHH NOOO. Better stuff is cheap at the costs of employee salery. It's a rotten way to run a society and i will never understand why it's so accepted. Makes me appriciate living in Denmark.
Which contributes to a more violent less stable country in general. Not saying America is ultra-violent because it’s not on the whole though there are parts worse than others. But toward the OP multi ethnicity isn’t a problem per se with violence, but multiple incompatible cultures coming into conflict with one another is.
"Not saying America is ultra-violent because it’s not on the whole "
Denial is not a river in Egypt.
It is in any way a black only issue, black immigrants do not have the same crime rate there is no crime gene found in only black people.
- - - Updated - - -
Do you really base your view of the world on one off outliers? By that logic you should think all of the world is a shit hole as something bad had happend litteraly every where.
Life is conflict. Peace is death.
"He who lives without discipline dies without honor" - Viking proverb
Honestly i would link it to our economic issues which just exacerbate a mix of medical and basic infrastructure as well as education issues.
If we stopped spending so much on war and had universal healthcare(and stopped using medications like they are water) while implememting a better education system and actually looked after the people. I suspect crime rates would drop.
Oh and demilitarized the police and stopped worshipping them and military personell just by taking a certain job.
Also hold anyone who abuses power responsible instead of sweeping it under the rug
- - - Updated - - -
Sadly i feel it will take an insane amount to fix this issue herem so much hate on both sides and each side has almost completely demonized the other. It is actually surprising a civil war gadn't broken out yet with a political as opposed to religious root..would have the same degree of "THEY ARE EVIL" though i suspect
- - - Updated - - -
Meanwhile i would say the opposote hold police responsible for excessive force and any officer getting too jittery is given a desk job till they calm down.
Buut this involves holding people in power to a higher standard abd demanding only the best in such positions
I actually would love to make it so any officer found guilty of a crim get 3 times the maximum punishment AS A BASELINE for them. Just because of their responsibility to society
- - - Updated - - -
Yeet republicans spend like crazy abd give tax breaks to those who need them least.
And both parties overfund the army to make their corporate masters happy
- - - Updated - - -
50 60 hell 100 years ago was doable. Today? Their are too many guns the law changes would never get even half of them and grabdfathering them in would create a black market trade.
We cannot just ban or limit guns here like europe they are too prevelant also it is just a red herring imo. We have much much deeper issues then guns in the us right now.
- - - Updated - - -
Yet removing that freedom can backfire as well due to the potential to twist saud laws. Imagine if we banned hate speech right now. I expect trump would try to get his critics branded for it and oddly protect the actual natzis and kkk while punishing anyone against them(and i HAVE seen alot of hate on the left too)
No we need to foster a sense of community and conraderie amongst all people. Not divide us further as the modern trend of identity politics does. Race, gender, sexuality etc. none of it matters as much as people think.
We need to unite.
Also you cannot stop or criminalize hate in any real waym all that will do is bury it and make it an underground issue that festers and rots until it pops. Unlessss you are talking eugenics and brainwashing in which case fuck no.
I would rather hateful bigots be free to soeak and be kaughed at/torn down through debate then fought outright as that only feeds their movement and cements their views further.
- - - Updated - - -
This and i will add to also defend hate if it is hating the right people or oppression if it is the right people.
Nobody shoukd be silenced ir told they cannot speak but i hear it all the time from both the left and right. Honestly the ONLY difference between the far left and far right here is who they oppose/their batlecries. While their methedologies are basically identical and they both are so full of hate it is not even funny. Meanwhile each feeds the other by excluding or silencing different groups who they don't agree with/view as not having anything to bring to the table. Thus pushing peopke into an enemy of my enemy is my friend situation.
It just creates a cycle and makes this all worse. Why i am pro free speech and say we need to come together abd stop focusing on race/gender/sexuality and so on..all this focus on external bullshit just tears us apart.
I just can't see any way to make it happen without alienating many people due to their views. It is hard to live in peace with people who want you dead just for being who you are. Whether it be your sexual preference, your skin color, or your religion, there are people who would have you dead if they got their way.
I am quite stuck on this, in such that I don't see a way to achieve true peace without trampling people's way of life.
To be clear, I do not advocate eugenics or any such mass removal of people in the name of peace. No national cleansing or anything.
RIP Genn Greymane, Permabanned on 8.22.18
Your name will carry on through generations, and will never be forgotten.