WTF kind of logic is this? Are defense lawyers murderers when they take up a case? They're defending murderers after all.
This is the problem with you rabid SJWs. There is zero discussion to be had if you don't agree with someone. You just resort to calling them racist (or whatever -ist you think is applicable) and try to ruin their lives.
https://www.hotslogs.com/Player/Prof...ayerID=1579599
"MMOC forums let me keep my job again. Whew." -Greg "Ghostcrawler" Street
https://www.hotslogs.com/Player/Prof...ayerID=1579599
"MMOC forums let me keep my job again. Whew." -Greg "Ghostcrawler" Street
Lawyers get a pass because they have an ethical obligation to ensure every defendant receives a defense, regardless of whether their lawyer thinks they're guilty or not. The defendant's lawyer is required to defend their client. It isn't remotely like jumping in to defend a private citizen.
There isn't any productive discussion that can be had. Their expressed viewpoint is harmful and hurtful. It does not warrant discussion, because they do not have a valid point to discuss.This is the problem with you rabid SJWs. There is zero discussion to be had if you don't agree with someone. You just resort to calling them racist (or whatever -ist you think is applicable) and try to ruin their lives.
And again; the only person ruining anyone's life is the stupid racist (or whatever) who said something racist in public. They are responsible for the social backlash that results, not everyone else who witnessed their conduct. Worse; the public has next to no capacity to do anything, not unless A> the act was so obscenely objectionable that basically everyone agrees it was wrong and terrible, and B> those who can have an actual effect on the target's life, like employers and family members and the like, also agree it was a horrible thing to say.
How we got to a point where you want to protect the guy who actually did or said the bad things from people who noticed that he did so I don't know. That somehow, in your mind, people noticing the conduct of these people is somehow unfair to them.
It's not.
If you don't want to get labelled as a racist shithead, don't act like a racist shithead in public. If you can't tell what that looks like and you're sure you're going to cross that line, you're probably legitimately racist to begin with, so yeah, you'll probably slip up and reveal your true colors. Or you could, like, stop being an abusive racist. That's an option too, that somehow gets constantly overlooked.
Imagine that instead of "saying racist things", we were talking about "date-raping a girl". The guy totally roofied her. He admits that he did. He admits he did so because he knew she wouldn't sleep with him unless he drugged her. He just thinks he should get to do that because he was nice to her for a couple dates and she wasn't putting out. Your argument is that we shouldn't blame the guy for being a fucking rapist, we should take issue with the folks who saw him spike her drink and reported him to the cops. Sorry, no. The public is acting exactly as they should in these cases.
Last edited by Endus; 2018-05-20 at 03:12 AM.
There is absolutely no basis for individual rights to firearms or self defense under any contextual interpretation of the second amendment of the United States Constitution. It defines clearly a militia of which is regulated of the people and arms, for the expressed purpose of protection of the free state. Unwillingness to take in even the most basic and whole context of these laws is exactly the road to anarchy.
Saying "that black guy there robbed a convenience store, I saw him do it" isn't racist, assuming you actually saw that guy do that thing. Because his blackness isn't really a factor; you're only mentioning it to identify him.
Saying "that black guy there probably robbed a convenience store, all blacks do stuff like that" is obviously racist. Because his blackness is your motivating factor.
In this case, thinking these folks were illegal immigrants because they speak Spanish? It's in the latter category, where it's obviously racist. He knows nothing about their particulars that would justify that accusation, he's making a prejudiced statement solely based on their use of language.
You're right, context and facts do matter. And they're entirely against your position in this case.
Zero discussion? Hahaha, that's the problem with you red pill maga-nogi heroes. You McCarthy your way through whatever label is given to you by society for your horrible, immoral world views and all you can do is come back with "SJW cuck" and "all you can do is say racist and run".
There's no arguing with people like you who can't actually argue and spend 99.95% of their time playing what about the whataboutisms.
There is absolutely no basis for individual rights to firearms or self defense under any contextual interpretation of the second amendment of the United States Constitution. It defines clearly a militia of which is regulated of the people and arms, for the expressed purpose of protection of the free state. Unwillingness to take in even the most basic and whole context of these laws is exactly the road to anarchy.
That's not at all what was being discussed. Just because you think you are mocking them doesn't mean they feel mocked. If they don't feel mocked you're doing a shit job and actually helping them out in same way. Because they're getting free air time and are capable of recruiting new racists because of your banter.
You don't have conversations with Hitler unless you are trying to help Hitler, you name and shame and give them no platform or quarter.
You know what will actually have effect you want to have on them? Making them feel weak and powerless by doing it just like I said and then ignoring them.
See also: trolls, children throwing fits in public, etc
Last edited by Shakou; 2018-05-20 at 05:14 AM.
Dude no offense but if you think this guy is not racist you are an idiot. The man couldn't be more racist if he took a hunting knife and carved I AM A RACIST into his forehead.
What in the god damn world do you fucking thing racists even are if this is the fucking guy you give the benefit of the doubt?
- - - Updated - - -
You're not even responding to things anyone actually said here. If you cannot respond to what someone actually said in plain English we can't have discussions about anything here. This is why they started handing out infractions for calling people trolls here, we legit cannot tell.
Is English like a 3rd or 4th language to you or are you just shit at having discussions?
The shit you and other dude are responding to my posts with is not even a response to things I posted. You are pretty much ignoring what I posted and replacing it with gibberish nonsense that actually makes zero sense as a response to me.
- - - Updated - - -
ENGLISH MOTHER FUCKER DO YOU SPEAK IT?
When you respond to him you are giving him a platform to respond to you. IF you STOP RESPONDING they go away, as do their views. It's not rocket science. Don't feed the fucking Gremlins after midnight and don't invest in the Rise of Nazi Germany after WW1 like a lot of Americans did.
I mean for fucks sakes dude the reason why people like Alex Jones, and Ben Shapiro and Milo Yiannopaulos, everyone on Fox News, Matt Drudge and Rush Limbaugh etc etc etc have careers is because people like you respond to them all of the time. Conservative beliefs are dying out at such a rate they would hardly even be gaining newcomers if it weren't for the left. Think about it but don't think too hard it isn't a difficult concept.
Last edited by Shakou; 2018-05-20 at 05:31 AM.