Originally Posted by
Crackleslap
You initially started on kel because someone already had a vote on them. You had only changed to Marack because reticence said kel was against Dendrek defending BF to your attention. Marack was the scummier between the two but you go Kel instead because of an already vote. Whilst the kel vote is reasonable, it almost feels like you only looked at the vote patterns instead of what they actually did in thread. It could seem opportunistic. You then took a stance on Satsu (you weren't the first, but were vocal) and it wasn't alignment indicative what he did, he was towny to me (others also mentioned), but he played it wrong. It's just you called Marack scummy but became rather vocal about a policy lynch rather than your own read.