BBC have reported it
https://www.bbc.co.uk/search?q=oxford+grooming
BBC have reported it
https://www.bbc.co.uk/search?q=oxford+grooming
tinfoils already report about the death penalty of that guy and how Muslims will soon rule over Europe...........
Problem is are they demonstrating when there are white rapists in court?
- - - Updated - - -
Why all this is there will be nor reporting until AFTER they are done with the proceedings? Thats how i read it. Because i hope you guys aretreating all criminals alike you know "innocent until proven...."??
I'm morbidly curious to see if he gets murdered for Allah and becomes a martyr, or if he's eventually gets free to keep reporting on gang rapists that the newspapers won't.
Do I? Where did you take yours? My point in the context of what was being discussed was that the government have nothing to with the judiciary due to its independence, which you now acknowledge, however you appeared with the idiotic semantic argument that the judiciary is part of government which neither countered my point or, indeed, had anything to do with what was being discussed.
So thank you for your input and proving something that I never said wrong. Well done. You can run along now!
Last edited by Pann; 2018-06-15 at 04:57 PM.
Next time don't do something stupid while on a suspended three months imprisonment sentence? Common sense.
It is not. I wrote that the government had nothing to do with judiciary which in terms of what was being discussed is entirely correct. Yes, you did proceed to tell that they are part of the government which is completely irrelevant to the point I had made. I did not tell you that you were wrong; I simply stated that they are independent of government.
Why would I find your inability to read embarrassing? By law the judiciary are independent of government. I am not moving any goal posts; you cannot read.
- - - Updated - - -
What? He broke the law, twice, which he admitted and as a result he was sent to gaol. Why would you want guilty people to walk free?