Yes
No
Mexico, feeling comfortable enough to regularly criticize the USA. Thanks Trump!
Edit:
NoIs immigration to first world countries a human right?
But, I certainly do wish first world countries were responsible for the over all health and well being of the world and its inhabitants.
The man who is likely going to be the next president of Mexico has made this a central point of his campaign, Trump may even be helping him win by taking a position against illegal aliens. It is certainly a significant percentage of the population in Mexico that believes this.
Most people would rather die than think, and most people do. -Bertrand Russell
Before the camps, I regarded the existence of nationality as something that shouldn’t be noticed - nationality did not really exist, only humanity. But in the camps one learns: if you belong to a successful nation you are protected and you survive. If you are part of universal humanity - too bad for you -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Honestly I'm semi torn on this subject because America is far from faultless in the problems of other countries. That isn't to say that Mexico (for this example) is innocent of their issues but my admittedly limited knowledge of the subject is that we've done a lot of damage through gun/drug trade with cartels to hurt the quality of living of Mexicans. But if we have hurt a country and endangered it's peoples through direct or indirect actions, then I don't see much wrong with that countries peoples flee'ing to us.
To be entirely fair, once upon a time menial unskilled work was able to support an individual or a family much better then it currently could.
No but it shouldn't be so painful, expensive, and arduous to do. I was listening to a news story about a lady who spent 13 years going through the process. That's ridiculous.
Way I see it, every other major first world country has laws in place if you want to immigrate there. Why should the US be any different? All these people are here illegally, and if they are NOT legal US citizens or have green cards/work visas, then it should be our right as a country to deport these people. Yes, the separation of children from their parents was a pretty low blow, but to actually round up the illegals at all is progress. much of our crime in the southwest comes from illegals, so to deport them is a step towards reducing crime. As for some of our nationalization laws, the whole "if you're born in the US or on US controlled soil (ie territories or military bases) then you are granted citizenship" thing is being abused by these families crossing the border. They'll have children, and then use that as a technicality. Only law we should have is if you are born to a citizen, then you are a citizen. If you are born to a citizen while outside the US or its territory, then proof of some sort (like a DNA test). Otherwise, sorry to sound cruel, but if the kids are illegal too, they kinda need to go.
You mean, if in first world countries you actually had benevolent rulers, as opposed to a system in which oligarchs engage in constant petty infighting over power? Have you ever considered it a possibility that democracy is actually bad, in that it results in a permanent internal power struggle?
Most people would rather die than think, and most people do. -Bertrand Russell
Before the camps, I regarded the existence of nationality as something that shouldn’t be noticed - nationality did not really exist, only humanity. But in the camps one learns: if you belong to a successful nation you are protected and you survive. If you are part of universal humanity - too bad for you -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
You know things are different when you quote them in context sort of what happens when you quote the daily caller if you go to the source it translates to this.
My translation could be wrong but since no other outlet is reporting like the dailycaller that I can find I am going to put this as fake news since dailycaller is just another Fox News 2.0“And soon, very soon — after the victory of our movement — we will defend all the migrants in the American continent and all the migrants in the world who by necessity must leave their villages to seek life in the United States, It is their human rights that we are going to defend
It's not a human right, human rights come into it depending on how immigrants/asylum seekers are treated.
I know this won't stop the conservative circle jerk but this is a report from the rally from journalists who don't have their heads up Trump's ass.
http://www.latimes.com/world/mexico-...619-story.htmlAndres Manuel Lopez Obrador — front-runner in the July 1 election — charged that U.S. authorities were expelling the children in “inhumane conditions.”
The candidate of the National Regeneration Movement asked that President Enrique Peña Nieto deliver a note of protest to the White House and that a team of “experts” be dispatched to the U.S.-Mexico border to assist repatriated children and their families. He also asked for a United Nations investigation of a policy that, Lopez Obrador said, “goes against the most fundamental human rights.”
considering the US is primarily at fault for the conditions of the countries many people are fleeing from? yes
Those from the 'no borders' brigade will argue it is a human right because they believe people should be able to wander the globe like wildebeest.
That we even talk about "illegal" immigration as if it's anything other than non-issue is hilarious to me. If Republicans actually cared they'd arrest, fine, and imprison business admins and management that willfully hire undocumented workers. Instead, using Trump as the perfect example, they hire them while doing everything in their power to make sure that it's overlooked. That's how you know that this is all smoke and mirrors, because if Republican politicians actually cracked down on business owners this little issue would be solved practically overnight. The reality is that they LOVE cheap labor that they can exploit, and that's readily apparent as the party constantly tries to dismantle labor rights for domestic workers.
Depends. Does every migrant support things like the 1st amendment? Is there a large surplus of resources like water and housing?
Currently there is no universal right, it's conditional on how good the society is at integrating people and producing useful stuff.