Most played means nothing. Why you're even bringing that up is beyond me. And nothing about paladin being the most played means RET is the most played spec of them. So...irrelevant.
Okay, so here's an idea, let's just gut half of WW, give it to Brewmaster/Mistweaver, and call it a day. You're fine with that, right? Having a gimped melee spec that won't get you a spot in a raid because people would rather have a MW and bring a rogue for that melee spot, right?
Oh, and let's ignore the fact that there's been barely any druid feedback, and all the paladin feedback has been two short posts about prot, and a single about ret.
Meanwhile, Mistweaver got a pretty indepth explanation and feedback to a revamp. But yes, totally Blizzard caters to paladins.
All you're doing is proving you literally have no idea what you're talking about, and you're trying to just screw over others because you want YOUR class to be the best (Which, mind you, Windwalker is in a far better spot currently than Ret is, but okay!)
The actual facts are as I listed.
Ret has never been brought for "utility" that you claim is so great, not once throughout all of Legion.
Your "but just one is enough!" is irrelevant, because if the utility is good enough to warrant one, then usually multiple will be stacked to take advantage of that (ex- Rogues and their feint).
Holy paladins have all the utility that ret has, PLUS a raid wide CD and Hand of Sacrifice. So anything a ret can do, holy can do better.