Perhaps "force" is not the technically correct term to use here, sorry if your big brain can't get around that and get the idea. I'll spell it out a little better for you:
You are responsible for the fetus existing, therefore also responsible for it being dependent on you. Consequently you are also responsible if you remove what it is dependent on.
If you didn't intentionally run over the cat, it was accident. That's how those words work. Regardless, there's still a difference between intentionally and unintentionally killing something. Whether or not you care isn't relevant.
Thanks. I don't speak Nonsense.
You played a part in the fetus's existence, yes. But what you're responsible for depends on how you decide to handle it. If you decide to abort it, you're responsible for making it happen. If you decide to keep it, you're responsible for caring for it. There is no obligation, moral or otherwise, to allow a fetus come to turn. The logic that because you allowed a pregnancy to occur, that it's your "duty" to allow it to be born and raised is ignorant and infantile.
Last edited by Mistame; 2018-07-11 at 10:45 PM.
So why did you use "letting a child die is neglect not murder" as a counter to "letting a child die is the same as letting a fetus die"? 1) you could have jumped straight to "i didn't legally agree to care for a fetus" and 2) you were wrong because, as I showed you, death from neglect can be charged as murder.
Responsibility isn't all legal. Just because you don't sign something doesn't mean you aren't to be held responsible. Glad you value the law and signatures more than human life and rights though, eh?
Those first two words just invalidated your argument. You did not just "let it die", you "removed it" THEN "let it die". AKA you are the reason it died.
- - - Updated - - -
And this is the place where the line is drawn between moral human beings and those that just go by the letter of the law. I'm sorry your morality relies completely on written documents manufactured by man and not by basic human rights.
As fun as this was, I'mma call it quits. I thought the argument of "it isn't a human yet" was bad enough, but seeing people argue that it is a human and that doesn't change anything is disgusting. What a sad, selfish and irresponsible mentality some people have. Good luck!
No, "accidental" literally means "unintentional" (lack of intent). If a cat runs out in front of me, I'm not going to intentionally hit it, but I'm not going to risk damaging my car to avoid it, either. My car > your cat. This isn't the same as me intentionally running over your cat.
can we at least agree that this chick is a shit comedian?
Do you know what indifference is? Driving your car into a crowd of people because you don't give a shit if they die or not isn't any better than doing so with the intent to kill them. Driving your car into a crowd of people because you don't give a shit is as much of an accident(It's not) as doing so with the intent to kill them.
Last edited by Freighter; 2018-07-11 at 11:03 PM.
So now indifference is your argument? In my example, let's say I'm indifferent to the fact that I hit your cat because my car is more important. In fact, my first reaction is to go to the car wash because dead stuff stinks. Even then it's still not comparable to me intentionally running over your cat.