Well... not no military at all. We are already in a de facto cyber war, and that might ramp up quite a lot. The terrifying part about that is that cyber wars don't really have a limit in how much real world damage they can do. Right now we have been mutually probing each other's financial and physical infrastructure systems, but nobody has pulled the trigger yet on taking anything down. Russia has also done some experiments on inventing major news items like attacks and riots, and getting a real reaction going before it can be confirmed. This is also potentially devastating.
Might be playing one devil against another, but getting in with China and the Belt and Road Initiative might be one way to do it. Some of the project will be expanding into areas of Russia (through Mongolia and also through Kazakhstan). If both routes ended in those two respective countries (ending at Astana and Ulaanbaatar respectively), it would likely wind up hurting the initiative's expansions with Russia proper, forcing Russia to deal in a more direct fashion with two intermediary countries. Might benefit both of them more in the long run as well if they have more control in dealings with Russian trade and negotiations.
If ever I give inaccurate information, I will apologize when corrected and adjust my views. It will be a cold day in hell before I stick to a falsehood out of misguided principles. If ever I insult you though, trust it to be an accurate insult, which I will not apologize for nor adjust my view of you.
The Cyber War is very frightening. I feel like we've been the victim more than the culprit. But I'm not very aware of what the U.S.'s capabilities are in this arena - I would assume it's immense.
Agreed re no direct military action/battle/war.
- - - Updated - - -
I do like that option. Use the seized funds (not frozen, seized) for direct bolstering of our voting security. They might not have found a way to affect direct votes yet, but they are looking. That's already been confirmed.
Back when I lived in Ohio (the shithole that it was and still is), there was a push on the state level to introduce critical thinking classes in middle and high school to replace a lot of the cancelled arts and music classes that lacked funding. It failed by a small margin if I recall correctly, but didn't get brought back up again after some state Congressmen got tossed in jail.
If ever I give inaccurate information, I will apologize when corrected and adjust my views. It will be a cold day in hell before I stick to a falsehood out of misguided principles. If ever I insult you though, trust it to be an accurate insult, which I will not apologize for nor adjust my view of you.
To Western economies, yes. Values, no. I'm not pro China spreading influence, but to the other countries that would benefit from it, I cannot help but concede, considering the West is offering no opportunities to many of these countries that I've lived in over the years (hell, how many of our politicians can even name 1/3 of the -stan countries or even know where Mongolia is).
If ever I give inaccurate information, I will apologize when corrected and adjust my views. It will be a cold day in hell before I stick to a falsehood out of misguided principles. If ever I insult you though, trust it to be an accurate insult, which I will not apologize for nor adjust my view of you.
That is also important, but I would disagree regarding priority. If they find a way to literally change votes without our knowledge, that's the ballgame.
Lol, agreed - and as a little bit of irony, so was I re Debate. Got a college scholarship for it, even. Thought it was awesome I was being paid to argue.The most important part of my high school education was debate. Not that debate was part of the curriculum, I was just in a private school that collected trophy and I captained the debate team. I learned far more there than I did in any class. Debate should be a core subject for all students.
And it should be a core subject. So many things we fuck up in this country re education. Civics, just a clear "for instance".
Possibly, I don't think there is any way to know for certain how much we do "offensively", because most of our rivals are far less transparent. Remember when Skroe was railing about China stealing our latest tech via a cyber attack? The odds of China ever admitting it if we did the same to them are basically non-existent. Without things like the Mueller investigation we wouldn't have any idea what Russia was doing, and the Mueller investigation could not exist in places like China or Russia.
Regardless of what happens in this case, the cyber threat isn't going away, and it is going to get a lot worse. I might legitimately recommend a cyber force as a department of the military, rather then the Space force. It won't look like any other branch of the military, but the war has already started there.
This is a very good point. Obviously, we wouldn't say anything. And you're right that China wouldn't admit to being infiltrated. So I guess it's like the CIA, we only hear about the mistakes. I would hope/assume that the U.S. does bring a good game.
I think we need the Cyber Force much more than the Space Force. Although given the originations of the NSA, we might already have one.Regardless of what happens in this case, the cyber threat isn't going away, and it is going to get a lot worse. I might legitimately recommend a cyber force as a department of the military, rather then the Space force. It won't look like any other branch of the military, but the war has already started there.
- - - Updated - - -
Cannot agree more. Researching and knowing both sides was key to winning in debate, and it certainly made me a more objective person when it came to issues I was passionate about.
Interesting. It would depend, I think and as always, on the parents. For me, I would see the reasoning for it. Other parents perhaps not so much, because they wouldn't see it objectively - as a learning/thought exercise.
Economically. Russia didn't want Clinton in office because if one thing she was good knowing how to operate at the state level, whether you agree with her decisions or not. Russia is (maybe was) hurting economy and there's no way the world would've let Russia off the hook with Clinton behind the desk.
Russia got very good at cyber warfare because its cheap, low key, effective, and old heads don't know how to deal with it. It's their only real way to fight back against sanctions but Obama and the executive departments already had a plan for it...they just needed to pass on the buck to the next leader. She would have sanctioned the R out Russia and been proactive against them on the cyber battlefield.
In essence the punishment was ready to go (due to Russia cyber espionage in general). Russia knew it needed to double down on Trump because we all knew he couldn't keep up with Russia's long game, which is to regain status in the world by undermining the US.
Can't really quote you from my phone but the US has several divisions to combat cyber threats. On the grand scheme, we have the most capable cyber assets in the world. What we don't have is a clear defined enough cyber doctrine or backing from Congress to meet our full potential. The US invented cyber warfare but the Russians perfected it.
Last edited by PACOX; 2018-07-13 at 10:56 PM.
Resident Cosplay Progressive
If ever I give inaccurate information, I will apologize when corrected and adjust my views. It will be a cold day in hell before I stick to a falsehood out of misguided principles. If ever I insult you though, trust it to be an accurate insult, which I will not apologize for nor adjust my view of you.
hang on are these 12 from that thing that was mentioned months ago?
oh yea but it was mentioned i didnt mean the social media folk ive bothered to google now
https://twitter.com/MeetThePress/sta...32526463569920
from march
timing of this is political as fuck.