Kansas guy wishes to legally pay for happy massages!

[skumnasty]

I don't think paying for sex should ever be an option. If you want to have sex then you should learn to talk to men/women, put effort into looking good.

He has a point though tbh... what's the difference between paying for a currently legal massage and paying for one that results in sexual release? The only difference is the body parts being used to massage and receiving the massage, and if both consent, it is simply paying for a specific "massage". This has nothing to do with "earning" sex. It is all about paying for a service.

[Doctor Amadeus]

In any case, I am of the opinion that anyone can get someone to sleep with them. It might not be 9's or 10's unless a person decides to go the self-improvement route, though.

Hahaha, you are probably correct, I don't think all that is going to get in the way of his quest for legal rub tug. Not everyone is looking to improve themselves

[Jtbrig7390]

He seems like the kinda guy to really want legalized prostitution.

And that's a bad thing how?

Ontopic: While I think he did this as a stunt he does have a point. Prostitution should be legalized, Hell we already sell our body's as it is so what is one way of selling it is sexual.

[s_bushido]

For the same reason not everybody wants to live next to a casino. It doesn't have anything to do with liking or disliking what other people do. It has to do with where people want to live and what they want living next to them.

What might be appropriate some places might not be for others.

...what?

That's not an argument...that's just an excuse. People are most likely having sex very close to where you live anyway. Does that bother you? Do you want that we should ban all sexual activities outside of designated Sexitoriums?

[Deleted]

He has a point though tbh... what's the difference between paying for a currently legal massage and paying for one that results in sexual release? The only difference is the body parts being used to massage and receiving the massage, and if both consent, it is simply paying for a specific "massage". This has nothing to do with "earning" sex. It is all about paying for a service.

Are you being obtuse on purpose?

[Jtbrig7390]

For the same reason not everybody wants to live next to a casino. It doesn't have anything to do with liking or disliking what other people do. It has to do with where people want to live and what they want living next to them.

What might be appropriate some places might not be for others.

No it doesn't, Only reason its illegal is because of old fuck's putting religion before common sense.

If someone wants to sell there ass next door to you you would never know. Hell I bet someone on your block has done it this week.

Also there is a such thing as zoneing laws.

[Celista]

He has a point though tbh... what's the difference between paying for a currently legal massage and paying for one that results in sexual release? The only difference is the body parts being used to massage and receiving the massage, and if both consent, it is simply paying for a specific "massage". This has nothing to do with "earning" sex. It is all about paying for a service.

Because massage therapists aren't sex workers.

[Stelio Kontos]

...what?

That's not an argument...that's just an excuse. People are most likely having sex very close to where you live anyway. Does that bother you?

It's not the sex, it's the type of people that sort of business attracts. In college, I lived in a rough part of town, had a "massage parlor" and a porn shop on the same block.

It led to a lot of real scummy folks hanging around, in addition to the usual junkies as well.

[minkage]

Prostitution should 100% be legalised like it is in the rest of the world.

Instead of having shady pimps that use and mistreat girls you could have a unionised and well maintained industry that focuses on looking after the workers.

[Stelio Kontos]

Because massage therapists aren't sex workers.

Ugh, some poor Chinese or Vietnamese immigrant, barely speaking English, and being expected to sexually service all the creepy loners and old perverts coming by if she wants to keep her job?

Yeah, that won't attract the wrong element at all.

[s_bushido]

It's not the sex, it's the type of people that sort of business attracts. In college, I lived in a rough part of town, had a "massage parlor" and a porn shop on the same block.

It led to a lot of real scummy folks hanging around, in addition to the usual junkies as well.

Yes, yes, and we all know no one wanted to live near a speakeasy with all those hooligans and ne'er-do-wells lousing about. Using the consequences of something being taboo/illegal as an excuse to keep it taboo/illegal is fucking stupid.

[Deleted]

Prostitution should 100% be legalised like it is in the rest of the world.

Instead of having shady pimps that use and mistreat girls you could have a unionised and well maintained industry that focuses on looking after the workers.

Like it is in the rest of the world? Is this rest of the world some kind of alternative universe?

[Stelio Kontos]

Yes, yes, and we all know no one wanted to live near a speakeasy with all those hooligans and ne'er-do-wells lousing about. Using the consequences of something being taboo/illegal as an excuse to keep it taboo/illegal is fucking stupid.

Porn shops are legal, doesn't stop the creeps and weirdos from infesting the environs.

[Doctor Amadeus]

No it doesn't, Only reason its illegal is because of old fuck's putting religion before common sense.

If someone wants to sell there ass next door to you you would never know. Hell I bet someone on your block has done it this week.

Also there is a such thing as zoneing laws.

Well it isn't just religious, so you are wrong there, as for morals, yes that could be it, and if someone did do it on my block and I didn't know great, but honestly I would suggest you educate yourself and visit places where prostitution and gambling for example are legal.

For some it isn't a problem others it is, and if that community doesn't want any of it, nothing to force it on them.

[Deleted]

Why would he pay for it when he can just get a girlfriend.





*waits for it*

A gf is really just a high end and very expensive hooker who takes her payment in currency, emotion and time. Most of the time she/he is really not worth all that.

[Sky High]

I’m not entirely sure if the guy is trolling or not but either way he has my vote.

[Doctor Amadeus]

...what?

That's not an argument...that's just an excuse. People are most likely having sex very close to where you live anyway. Does that bother you? Do you want that we should ban all sexual activities outside of designated Sexitoriums?

No it doesn't bother me in the least bit, more power to them, but me PERSONALLY NO, I sure as fuck wouldn't want prostitution legal anywhere near and or around me. It has nothing to do with just my personal morals, but it has a lot more to do with the fact we have families where I live, and Prostitution, along with a many other forms of entertainment, wouldn't be especially appropriate.

[Doctor Amadeus]

A gf is really just a high end and very expensive hooker who takes her payment in currency, emotion and time. Most of the time she/he is really not worth all that.

No, that is actually not true and attitudes like that, might be a good reason why this shit is illegal most places.

[Deleted]

A gf is really just a high end and very expensive hooker who takes her payment in currency, emotion and time. Most of the time she/he is really not worth all that.

Well, look at that. What I said on the previous page about what it tells about people who thinks it's ok to pay for sex and their beliefs. Perfect example.

[Micronetic]

'murica yeah!