Bageloaf. It was his previous name on these forums.
- - - Updated - - -
If you thought I was scum, you wouldn't engage me to see if you could catch me in a lie? Maybe I'm misunderstanding you here. When you think someone is scum, that's all the more reason to have a conversation with them. That is, unless you are certain they are scum. But even then, you might catch them in a slip.
You said you'd be more clear, but there's nothing more clear about this statement. What felt off? Could you look at his posts and provide the "offness" you're seeing? You do point out one post (below) in particular, but since we're talking about him feeling off, your explanation does not explain that. It only shows his analysis is weak. This "off" you're referring to, is it a meta read? Because if it is, then him doing an analysis today does feel slightly off. This early in the game, he almost never does that. His normal MO would be to say "I don't have any reads". And while his analysis may be weak, it was practical and it was reasonable. It didn't feel forced.
That's a fair question. Ask him about it if it intrigues you. Don't use it as evidence in an argument against me. This would be legitimate scum hunting if you were to engage him with this point. But you're more interested in defending yourself than finding scum.
This is the first point you've made that I actually feel has strong merit. If Lora was trying to downplay his result then it's compelling reason to be distrustful of him. But that is not how I read his statement. If you look at it in context, there were posts before his discussing the potential randomness in the game. In particular, the potential randomness of the scum kill. Now, if you had asked him why he made that statement, I would have supported the question. But instead, you just basically said he was lying, and have been steadily and more aggressively pushing that narrative. This is what I don't like
I was annoyed, but not with the lack of responses. I was annoyed at what I had come to the thread to find.
- - - Updated - - -
Earlier today I was going to say there's no way you could be scum. Because certain things that have happened (I won't discuss exactly what, because it may give scum hints on how to play better) might not have happened if you were scum. You'd have warned them about the stupidity of those actions. (They're logic/math-related mistakes, btw.)
Maybe I was giving you too much credit?
(I'm joking :P)