I'm not claiming any "honorable and respectable" bullshit. I just follow the accepted definition to the letter. Don't make things up. Goblins had one ship. Play the game and see. It takes about half an hour to level your goblin to that point. Intent doesn't matter at all. Sylvanas did not intend to hunt down and eradicate every single night elf, but Teldrassil was somehow genocide - fine, then sinking a ship with the entire surviving population of Kezan is genocide as well. No double standards. If you have a problem with scale, let me remind you that all gnomes are a small percent of survivors from one city. All void elves are less than a village's worth of people. Same for darkspear trolls. Tauren were on the verge of extinction when they entered the Horde. Et cetera.
So much truth in this. In Cataclysm, he felt like a perfect warchief, a true warrior orc, balancing rage and discipline. But they couldn't handle a character that wasn't lawful good.
Last edited by Haven; 2018-08-18 at 07:32 PM.
Nah, you are part of the Sylvanas defense force and the Alliance is obviously as bad as Sylvanas because they fired upon a single goblin ship that miraculously contained the hundreds, if not thousands of goblins that were a part of the entire population of Kezan. Oh, no, they obviously cloned these goblins after the fact, or perhaps goblins simply age from infant to adult in a matter of days. Clearly this is why there are so many goblins.
This is absolutely ludicrous. You can do better than this, but I don't care to humor this any further.
Facts stay facts. One ship is one ship. You're forgetting the scale in lore vs scale in game. In game Teldrassil had like what, 50 night elves on it? 70? No big deal, right? Lorewise, it was populated by thousands. Same here. Lorewise, that was goblin Titanic that carried hundreds if not thousands.
Though something tells me the real reason is that goblins are green, ugly, and Horde, so it doesn't matter how many of them die, while night elves are pretty and Alliance, so their lives are precious, right?
It was because Cataclysm happened. In an expansion that was called, you know, "Cataclysm". Deathwing visited Kezan and fucked it up.
Last edited by Haven; 2018-08-19 at 10:29 PM.
It's both, from my understanding of "Before the Storm." Gallywix's voracious mining had already destabilized Kezan, and Deathwing's attack (causing the volcano to erupt) was essentially the straw that broke the camel's back. Deathwing himself could've caused some major damage to the surface, but piled on top of Gallywix's damage it made Kezan begin to fall apart.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
They did. He was captured en route to the Maelstrom and then subsequently freed by Goblins
And my point is still that the decision was a stupid one.My point is you can blame someone's action in the past based on the uncertainty of the future.
Ignorance is also not a defense. Try it some time, see how it goes. Also, it is not what I claim. It is what the game claims. The game states that Thrall is arguably the world's most powerful living shaman and also states he is the leader of the efforts at the Maelstrom. His effort is crucial. The game says so, not "I claim".SI:7 or Varian couldn't have the knowledge, in that moment, of what you claim, that Thrall and only Thrall could save the world.
This is trickier, given the time removal from the events of Cataclysm and everything that transpired in between. Events would have turned out differently long before the Cataclysm had the Dragonmaw maintained control of the red dragonflight indefinitely. But I would still argue that long term this was a poor decision as was kidnapping Thrall, which is kind of the point.My example with Dragonmaw is to point out, that following the 'blame in the past, for the crime/event in the future' line of thought, all actions against the aspects would be equally responsible for the end of the world, even without previous knowledge.
Which then broke free and turned on the Dragonmaw, decimating the clan and scattering it to the wind. A small contingent made it back to Outland and allied with Illidan before being defeated again, and the small outpost clinging to life in Twilight Highlands.In fact I do, for what I know Dragonmaw had success in her capture and she was forced to birth a whole clutch of eggs for the Black dragonflight (you still can see those in Grim Batol).
Some members are still around, but the clan as an entity is effectively non-existent in practice.And last I checked Dragonmaw Clan was part of the present Horde, was Garrosh himself, invited them and he even made their leader Warlord Zaela his mate. I don't know what happend after Siege of Orgrimmar for them though.
Of course it has some value, but what you want to look at is a cost-benefit assessment, and whether any likely costs would outweigh any beneficial value.And about Thrall capture plan, you can call it stupid but it's undeniable it has value.
And how would that work? Not as a trade, as soon as Thrall is given back Garrosh would attack anyway. Kept as a hostage, "Attack and we kill him!" style wouldn't work either with Garrosh.You would have a trading bargain with the Horde, could be even used to avoid an attack in one of alliance's weakened settlements.
He's not. I agreed on this point saying he's not concerned. I'm arguing he should have been and NOT being concerned was stupid and reckless. Being irrational and impulsive isn't a defense either. He SHOULD have known better and SHOULD have been concerned for all the reasons I listed. He would have completely botched an opportunity to let the Horde splinter, which it did culminating with the Siege of Orgrimmar. I'm not sure what sort of argument you are trying to make here. I'm saying that capturing Thrall was a stupid move, and your argument seems to be, "Well Varian doesn't care." Like no shit what's WHY he made a stupid move.And like I said, if Varian was willing to kill Moira in Ironforge soil, amidst a Dark Iron rebellion, the heir of Magni himself. Sorry I don't see how he would be worried about an attack from Garrosh.
If we agree that Thrall's capture plan occur before be reached the Maelstrom, how could anyone know Thrall's potential as a world savior? I can be wrong here, it has been a long time that I have done Goblins quests and Cataclysm start quest on the Horde side, so I don't recall Thrall being treated as a savior before reaching the maelstrom. I'm pretty sure none of alliance initial quests refer him as such, up until Deepholm starting quests that they make you speak with him (not sure if ally have to though).
About the rest, I think we will agree in disagree, I still think the plan of his capture valid, if you exclude the goblin genocide fiasco.
Alliance and Horde were out for full war at the beginning of cataclysm (Vash'jir beggining is all about it), if I was in Varian shoes I would have Thrall, his wife and even Greatmother Geyah marked as a fair target for capture, anything that could provide advantage against the enemy (moral, psychological or physical).
It's not like the Horde wouldn't do anything different, they tried capture Anduin at MoP.
Last edited by Beerbill Society; 2018-08-20 at 07:23 PM.
"... And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers, and you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee." - Ezekiel 25:17
"My name is Legion: for we are many." - Mark 5:9
My characters :3
why not? he clearly is. he supports her unquestioningly and accepts all her decisions so far as we've seen. one sarcastic "for the horde" isn't really enough from the guy whose hero father challenged the previous warchief to a duel to the death for much less than sylvanas has done.
baine doesn't even care about the blight being used to kill his own people who he sent over the seas to protect sylvanas, he's just a little sad that saurfang was left to die. but he drops this grievance for no reason minutes later and is happy to sit beside sylvanas on her airship.
i mean he can prove me wrong and start a vol'jin style rebellion if he wants but we all know he won't.
Dickmann's Law: As a discussion on the Lore forums becomes longer, the probability of the topic derailing to become about Sylvanas approaches 1.
Tinkers will be the next Class confirmed.
baine is unquestionably the worst character in all of warcraft.
he literally cares nothing for the ideals or well-being of the tauren people or the horde or the earth mother just so long as he gets to sit in mulgore wearing his feather headdress and superficially looking like a tauren chieftan
Baine is schizophrenic as well. In doing the Horde quests, in two zone hand ins, I saw the following.
1. "The Warchief will be told of what happened, she'll know best what to do "
2. "Thank you for upholding the Horde's honor, even if the Warchief might not understand."
Not that any of these activities had fuck all to do with honor. I could be playing the most dishonourable piece of shit to ever live and I'd still act in my interests in making sure Zandalar isn't taking over by a giant maggot.
Dickmann's Law: As a discussion on the Lore forums becomes longer, the probability of the topic derailing to become about Sylvanas approaches 1.
Tinkers will be the next Class confirmed.
Of course it was valid. That doesn't mean it wasn't irresponsible. They are not mutually exclusive. Just because Varian didn't know how stupid and reckless the plan was doesn't magically make it NOT stupid and reckless. You insist on focusing on whether or not Varian had a full understanding of how poorly conceived his plan was because he didn't have all the information at his disposal and jumped at a perceived target of opportunity, but that's tangential to the point I'm making which you don't seem to grasp.
Looking at the big picture, which we as players have the luxury of being able to do, the decision was stupid and put everyone in the world at risk. It's not a debate about whether or not Varian knew, that is irrelevant to the decision being poor from the god's eye view which is all I've been trying to say. The original comment came from Varian being held up as some noble paragon but it is also important to remember that he makes mistakes and almost blundered his way into getting everyone killed. That's it. That he didn't know what he was doing doesn't suddenly change his actions to something else.
"Father, is it over? I see only darkness before me."