5% overall isnt actually much of a nerf to be honest plus BM survivability is still insanely high. So not much is going to change really which is fine in the long run.
5% overall isnt actually much of a nerf to be honest plus BM survivability is still insanely high. So not much is going to change really which is fine in the long run.
It needed a slight nerf which is fine. Arms needed one too as that spec is f***ing disgusting.
Yep just looking at the front page today and it’s dead. Can’t have one of the range spec doing good
The PVP nerfs, though. Guess it's time to finally respec surv for pvp.
I'm glad it's just 5% right now.
That's like 600 dps, which would leave us in the middle upper bracket still.
Some of these changes make very little sense though. And a lot of specs need changes that go beyond a simple number tweak. (E.g. shadow priest / MM hunter / shaman)
I hope they get some love before 8.1, but I doubt it.
As long as PvP nerfs stay confined in PvP, I couldn't care less. 5% is manageable if we scale normally now.
more changes for BM
Hunter - Beast Mastery
Dire Beast: Basilisk now has a 60 Focus cost.
Dire Beast: Basilisk damage reduced by 30%.
Hunter Pet Basic Attack damage (Smack, Bite, and Claw) reduced by 30%.
Aspect of the Beast increases the damage of your pets by 20%, down from 30%.
Bestial Wrath increases the damage of you and your pet by 20%, down from 25%.
https://www.warcraftlogs.com/zone/statistics/19/#
Here is some evidence for you as well. Think it was justified, but probably yeah 5 % compared to havoc/arms was a bit too much, then again hunter is so much more mobile which is gonna work in it's advantage in mythic raids.
well blizz wants us to play the retarded kid surv.
BM is still strong as hell dont worry. Im having no trouble facesmashing people. If anything Survival is a little more appealing now also 2.3k rating 3s and we win majority of games by me rolling my face across the keyboard and occaionaly interupting/ccing a healer.
Yes I did, and that post doesn't have any better evidence than the link I provided. He is trying to for example justify frost dk nerfs based on a few fights that it is ahead of BM, even though you can CLEARLY see on my link that BM on AVERAGE is miles ahead of frost DK.
BM is good on almost ALL of the fights, while the classes he mentioned "should've been nerfed" just excel on a few. Don't be so denial and try to claim that BM didn't deserve this nerf, based on the data it's obvious that BM and rogue were too good. Gonna admit that DH and arms are quite strong and might get some minor tuning later.
I think you don't quite understand how balancing works, you cannot take single fights and then start yelling "b-but spec X was better than us on that fight so they need nerfs too!" Your supposed to look at the big picture. Also, in mythic BM is even more favored than other specs due to more movement so they would've been even more OP then. But hey, who can admit that their class needed nerfs, esp. if they suck at it and already were behind others due to just not being a good player.
Last edited by mmocddaf3ba36b; 2018-09-08 at 01:13 PM.
They are going to nerf every spec until Warlock is by far the best class again. Warlocks must be on top as always.
I was telling my BM brother the same, that he will do great at the start because people don't know the fights etc. But tbh not all fights are that complex. Like, tell me what is complex about heroic Taloc? I think almost everyone can understand the mechanics for THAT fight and execute it really well. Yet even on THAT fight, they are doing absurdly high DPS.