It might have something to do with inequality. It's a well documented fact that inequality in western society has risen dramatically over the past few decades. While the quality of live hasn't drastically decreased wages have stagnated, and while scientific and technological discoveries have made a great deal of things cheaper the avarage person hasn't really benefited from it because the prices they have to pay for healthcare and education have skyrocketed.
And science has proven that it doesn't really matter how good ones life is if their neighbours life is 10 times better and it gets rubbed in their face every day. Social status is very important to people and as time has passed society has become rather cruel and unforgiving toward those on the lower end of the scale and this has brought forth social unrest and crazy politicians, like it has done a thousand tines before in different eras.
Everything?
o.O
Anyways society hasn't changed people like to think things are better or worse. But humanity has enjoyed relative stability post WWII.
- - - Updated - - -
A neighbors life can't be 10 time better than someone living next door. Relative value of homes are in close proximity and linked to overall neighborhood value. Bottom line is that people have to accept that what they perceive as someone doing better is in fact piling on massive debt.
It hasnt, society has been like this since the first civ popped up.
WORLD POPULATION
U.S pop 318.2 million,Mexico pop 122.3 million ,Russia 143.5 million S.K 50.22 million China 1.357 billion ,United Kingdom 64.1 million, Europe "as a whole" 742.5 million, Canada 35.16 million, South America 387.5 million,Africa 1.111 billion , Middle east 205 Million , Asia "not counting china" 3.009 B ,Greenland 56k,, Iceland 323k, S/N pole 1k-5k/2k
Most people would rather die than think, and most people do. -Bertrand Russell
Before the camps, I regarded the existence of nationality as something that shouldn’t be noticed - nationality did not really exist, only humanity. But in the camps one learns: if you belong to a successful nation you are protected and you survive. If you are part of universal humanity - too bad for you -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
The Marxists have gotten a good foothold in this country but lack the courage of their convictions so they just trololololololed constantly.
Seriously waiting to hear about Trump doing anything worse than the last three presidents. He isn't expanding wars like Bush or Obama. He isn't deporting people like Obama or Clinton. He isn't getting impeached for lying under oath like Clinton. Yet the left likes to act like the sky is falling because they feel entitled to the presidency.
Seriously, it's hilarious. The opposition to the Grand Cheeto is basically just on a multi-year dumpster fire of a temper tantrum.
Okay. Cool story.
He is.
He is.
Yeah, because the investigation is still ongoing.
Funny bit of alt-right projection, here.
Yeah, it's not because he's an awful human being who sold his nation out to a foreign power with the blessing of his supporters like you.
"My successes are my own, but my failures are due to extremist leftist liberals" - Party of Personal Responsibility
Prediction for the future
Define long and define social media. Then compare it to social media's current form. Social media is massively new concept and it's one that is STILL evolving. Social media as we know it today is not old. Not at all.
The fact that you think hatred of Trump is indicative of leftist ideology shows how unaware Trump supporters are of what the entire rest of the world thinks of Trump. It's not a Leftist thing. He's an international threat. Virtually everyone agrees on that at this point, beyond his dwindling base and insincere internet edgelords who only like him because"owning the libs" is the only joy in life they have.
It hasn't you just got old enough to notice/care.
I am the lucid dream
Uulwi ifis halahs gag erh'ongg w'ssh
Sorry, the "great switch" has been thoroughly debunked. The left does not care about black people and never has. The only thing that is different since the 60s is that they now try to give the impression they care.
Not exactly a paragon of civic virtue.Originally Posted by LBJ
Moving on to the main topic, I blame the "going off the rails" on three things.
1. The death of expertise.
The internet, often wrong, falsified, and incomplete, is now deemed an acceptable substitute for any sort of experience or depth of wisdom in a field. Someone can read a slanted, error-filled, incomplete argument, and then consider themselves an expert on anything. While I am not sure of the amount of knowledge's increasing in the world, I do know that stupidity and ignorance is increasing. Many years ago, I had an argument with a student in my high school. I am from the south and am white, he was from NYC and was black. He pretty much hated everything I was, and, when the discussion of what caused the Civil War came up, he immediately trotted out the bromide that it was a glorious crusade to end slavery. When I started quoting everyone from Lincoln, to Douglass, to Grant, showing that that was NOT the case, he went to a computer (this discussion was in the lab) pulled up Encarta (this was in 1998) and read "The Civil War was over slavery" then did the most obnoxious display of gloating and excessive celebration this side of a Harlem street-ball game's game-winning shot.
.....Encarta.
2. The rise of identity politics.
It used to be, you held an informed opinion because you had learned about it and made a judgment. Now, you ARE what you believe, and anyone that disagrees with you is committing a mortal insult against you and must be brought down. My previous example was doomed to failure from the start because my opponent was black and I was white, therefore I was, in his eyes, a racist and and oppressor of him. Nothing could ever change that.
3. The fall of argument and its replacement by character assassination.
People possess little knowledge and less reason today than they used to have. When you cannot beat someone in an argument, you try to have them silenced, either through complaining to his employer to get him fired (he'll be quiet now and have to look for work), doxxing him (he'll be busy and scared now, so he'll be quiet), swatting him (he'll go to jail and maybe even get killed by the cops, so he'll be quiet). There's a reason "ad hominem" is a logical fallacy. Attacking someone's character is a low blow, and you will never regain their esteem, so the debating field becomes weaponized, in addition to personal.
4. The culture of dueling, or at least ass kicking, is gone.
There used to be conflict resolution in days past. If you got into a disagreement, and it got heated, your opponent would "demand satisfaction." That meant you were going to duel him. You either could: apologize, which was acceptable if there was a misunderstanding, or win, or lose. If you lost, you'd probably die, and, even more importantly, society judged you as wrong in the matter. If you won, your opponent is dead, and you are right. The matter was settled, either way.
More recently, running your mouth would earn you an ass-kicking, maybe even lethal. Again, you would win or lose.
But now, people can run their mouths and say the most heinous things and not be held accountable. Can you imagine how much nicer people would be? Generally, the most awful, toxic people are the most slovenly or weak, because self confident people don't say that sort of shit that they do.
So, people are ignorant, emotionally entrenched, willing to destroy someone's life simply for disagreeing with them, but not able to understand that that might, in earlier and hopefully soon again times, get them killed.
Son, society, human civilization, humanity, whatever the fuck you want to call it, has always been off the rails.