Is it ok to assault people you disagree with?

[Venant]

On one hand, yes, the world would be much better off. On the other, no, the world would just make better idiots. It'd be like snapping my fingers and curing the world's deadliest disease. Another will step up to the plate.

What if you could just keep repeating the process without negative consequences?

[Powerogue]

What if you could just keep repeating the process without negative consequences?

I'd be a Marvel antivillain.

[Kapadons]

If this forum has taught me anything, it’s that it is absolutely ok to assault someone you don’t agree with.

But you have to call them alt-right, fascist or nazi first.

[Tuhokoura]

Is it ok to assault people you disagree with? This includes political alignment

Yes, offence is the best defence. REEEEE!!!

[Daedius]

If this forum has taught me anything, it’s that it is absolutely ok to assault someone you don’t agree with.

But you have to call them alt-right, fascist or nazi first.

It's like that child's game "Punch buggy [Red]!" *Punches Arm*

[Deleted]

Is it ok to assault people you disagree with? This includes political alignment

Does this include verbal assaults on forums!? If yes, then my answer is YES, TOTALLY! Well as long as the mods are lax enough to permit it, or you can't be penalyzed for it, like making a FB page named John Smith and using it to verbally abuse people because FB's rules don't include these pages, only actual profiles can be reported.

[Deleted]

If you have to resort to assaulting someone that disagrees with you then you're not intelligent enough to argue your point in a constructive way.

Not sure that worked against Brownshirts in 1936.

Do you have any examples of Nazis being deterred by well constructed discussion?

[zenkai]

If this forum has taught me anything, it’s that it is absolutely ok to assault someone you don’t agree with.

But you have to call them alt-right, fascist or nazi first.

100% true statement right here. This forum reminds me of an abusive person beating their SO and shouting "see what you made me do!"

[Aleksej89]

Violent assault is obviously the only civilized way to respond to anyone that does not agree with you about anything.

[Tabrotar]

Do you have any examples of this?

We had a whole thread about some little fucker was only fined 1 dollar for assaulting someone because he had a different opinnion.

- - - Updated - - -

Go visit Hamburg on the 1st of May, that should be the best example.

Same for Leipzig or Berlin.

[the game]

If this forum has taught me anything, it’s that it is absolutely ok to assault someone you don’t agree with.

But you have to call them alt-right, fascist or nazi first.

So it's alot like yelling "It's coming right for us!" then.

[Varvara Spiros Gelashvili]

We had a whole thread about some little fucker was only fined 1 dollar for assaulting someone because he had a different opinnion.

- - - Updated - - -



Same for Leipzig or Berlin.

So he was punished and should've gotten a lot more. He also had to admit guilt which goes on his record punishment was light but it was punishment.

[The Stormbringer]

No. Next question with an obvious answer, please.

To: "Cheeky bloke" Congratulations, I want to let you know that you managed to melt my brain cells through reading your atrocious 'accent'.

[Ghostpanther]

100% true statement right here. This forum reminds me of an abusive person beating their SO and shouting "see what you made me do!"

Exactly. All I have to say it, be careful when you physically assault someone. Not everyone will turn the other cheek.

[manefesto]

Nope never, violence is never acceptable against someone you disagree with.

[Zython]

like I said, saying and doing is 2 different things. besides that "durr they said they're nazi get em'" is a dangerous line of thinking.

This isn't answering my question.

People like you won't stop at just "nazis" it'll move over to "bigots" anti-lgbtbbq people and anyone that not "woke" enough.

Not seeing the problem here.

We also live in nation with laws. Laws that protect your bleeding heart from the nazi boogeyman.

That's a...strange argument. Hitorically, and generally, laws tend to have the opposite effect.

[Lawlhero]

No. it isnt.

[PokeKitty]

Today I almost fought a bitch at a food store, she yelled me "You can't put that into the microwave because it will start fire!!!There is foil around the plate"

I mean I will only heat it for 30 second - 1 min but still idk why she yelled wtf... I just left and gave her a stare and walk off.

The reason why I won't verbal or physical assult people I disagree with is that like if I fight back and be more extreme, it will just drag the situation worse.

like if I fought with her or say something super offensive I might get a law suit or something, stuff like this will just cause me more anger and hate the person even more.

(*hmm need to vent a bit*)

[Guchie]

Rapists in general. Even when charges are brought they only get convicted 30% of the time.

Are they still rapists if a court of law found them innocent?

[Zython]

1. What question? I must've missed it.

Why should we not believe them when they tell us who they are?

2. You don't see the problem huh? Well there's a few with this line of rationale. The extreme left has a nasty habit of turning on itself. Words=/=proof.

So wait, you believe what someone says has absolutely no bearing on what they think, their intentions, or their ideas? Because the very fact that you're using words to communicate what you think to me shows that you don't actually believe this.

This is one of the things that destroyed #metoo. Not to mention the constant paranoia of having to watch ones back constantly.

Huh?

3. Are you kidding? Not getting assaulted and killed is generally a favoured law.

That's not what I was saying.

- - - Updated - - -

Are they still rapists if a court of law found them innocent?

Well, whether or not an event happened isn't changed by the consensus of the state, so yes.