Systematic racism (against people who didn't enforce apartheid because they weren't even born) is OK so long as it's targeted against whites, that's the racist logic of those who try and justify this. Aside from that, you'd think Zimbabwe should've been enough of a cautionary tale, but no. If it weren't for the innocent who are going to lose almost everything, I'd be glad in knowing it'll all turn into a barren wasteland very quickly. As a matter of fact, if I were a South African farmer, I'd literally salt the earth before fleeing.
Its not like they even have to go that far back. Zimbabwe did the EXACTLY same thing back in 2014. Sometimes, people are just so amazingly retarded, it really leaves me baffled.
Heres a little writeup i found:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-28152477 (july 2014)
"We say no to whites owning our land and they should go," - Mugabe
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...cda_story.html (September 2015)
“The problem now is that we have the land, but they have the experience,” said Mutinhiri, a black landowner.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...in-drought-aid (Feb 2016)
"Many farms are now under-utilised and the government has vowed to hold an audit to ensure agriculture land is put into production."
Let's say China conquered the US and gave all the land to Chinese people.
If the US finally overthrew China you wouldn't take back the land?
Or, alternatively (and I'm just spitballing here): Someone shouldn't get a pass on benefiting from criminal activity just because they're white.
Yes, yes, and absolute morons are constantly throwing the horrors of Venezuela in the face of anyone they can even remotely link with socialism or socialist policies. Why should we think this comparison is any more valid than that one?
Never claimed that they are the only ones responsible.
I stated it's a good thing Africa never conquered Europe, because then I suppose the Europeans would be happy to leave the land in position of the African's should they gain independence.
Oh wait, the Europeans are crying about immigrants and how they are ruining the country and how they should be deported. Can't have it both ways.
Last edited by Hilhen7; 2018-12-10 at 02:57 PM.
https://qz.com/africa/1218309/south-...g-white-farms/
Zimbabwe did it too, ask them how that turned out.
-=Z=- Satan represents vengeance instead of turning the other cheek! -=Z=-
https://bdsmovement.net/
No, they're not. As I've said several times already. There are lots of Arab Jews living in Israel, and there is a sizable Arab Muslim minority as well. They have all the rights and political participation as any other Israeli citizen. Have you been to Israel? I bet you imagine they all look like the cast of Schindler's list. In fact, They're by in large pretty indistinguishable from any of the other mixed crowds that occupy the greater Levant. This isn't a war about race, or even religion really. It's a war over land. It was in its inception, it remains so today.
The oppressed Palestinians I'm sure you're referring to don't live in Israel. Israel ceded that land a long time ago. They live in the West bank and Gaza, under their own governance. The IDF does make forays into those areas, and has occupied it for extended periods of time, but that's almost always in response to Palestinian aggression.
Now, I will concede the settlement building in the West Bank continues to be a problem, but that would have stopped a long time ago if the Palestinians would have accepted a peace deal, established a recognized border and, here's the big one, stopped attacking Israel. They've refused every peace treaty offered them because they refuse to accept the results of the 1967 war. Those in Israeli society who would stop the settlement, and there are a lot of them, would have far more political capital if their country wasn't constantly getting rocketed in the face.
Lastly, AGAIN. Displacing an indigenous population (which isn't what is happening in Israel), is not what Apartheid was. That's not the definition. Jim Crowe laws in the American South were an example of Apartheid, and the Black Americans were not an indigenous population. Apartheid was a system of laws within a country designed to disenfranchise a portion of IT'S OWN citizenry of their natural rights on the basis of their skin color. That's what it is. It's not anything else but that. Apartheid isn't colonialism, it isn't genocide, it isn't war. Even if you want to maintain your moral objections about Israel, you've no basis to claim they practice a form of Apartheid. Not a single one. You're just wrong. Stop using that word. It makes you look like a fool.
- - - Updated - - -
If those descendants of the Chinese, none of them who were old enough to partake in the conquest, and most of who weren't even adults by the time the system that favored the Chinese was overthrown, were now American citizens subject to the laws of the United States, no I wouldn't.
You have shit for brains if you think that the Palestinians are not being oppressed. They are locked into the land, cannot trade, cannot leave, and are having it slowly taken from them via settlements.
I never said Gaza and The West Bank were Israel, they are more akin to concentration camps than anything else. They are not truly sovereign, and I will refer you to the blockade of their banks, as well as their entire border. They are not free to trade, and are constantly getting Israeli forces in the area... killing them.
That's oppression, that's apartheid... with an Israeli spin.