I'm not even American, so GTFO with that "own party" nonsense.
- - - Updated - - -
No, you aren't.
Both of your examples were about speech.
And nobody's freedom of speech was restricted in either case. A platform for broadcast is not a component of freedom of speech and is not something you have any right to.
"Take the time to sit down and talk with your adversaries. You will learn something, and they will learn something from you. When two enemies are talking, they are not fighting. It's when the talking ceases that the ground becomes fertile for violence. So keep the conversation going."
~ Daryl Davis
The democrats want to fund the day to day business of government, while the Republicans are the ones trying to slip in quasi repeals and border wall. There is no inconsistency, unless you have to dumb it down to the level of a toddler to understand.
If 5 million is a pittance, surely trump can do without it?
- - - Updated - - -
Only in bizzaro world do you make sense. I knew you were a hypocrite, but you are literally clueless.
The biggest plot hole in the excuse for the continued shutdown is... besides the fact you can dug under or scale a wall, all of a sudden it's not a "solid wall" for obvious reasons (because a solid one couldn't be done.) Some of it can be "just fencing" (which already exists) and it's not even supposed to be concrete! But a transparent wall of some sort of material (bullet proof glass? fiber glass? lol) which has a cost no one really knows. Even if he got his 5 billion, cost estimates far exceed that, so what's next? Throw another temper tantrum the next time there's a budget bill to pass? How much money is enough?
It's trying to fulfill a campaign promise that was impossible to deliver on at the cost of government and the people who elected him to serve. Illegal immigration can be fought a great many ways, but Goddamn is this the dumbest way to go about it and unbecoming of the leader of the world's biggest economic power (not that the position he finds himself in ever dawned on the man.) Surveillance drones, more man power and paying more people at processing would all be a more efficient way to combat illegal immigration at the border than a vanity project spouted out during a very passionate campaign that preyed on the vulnerabilities of a disillusioned sect of the population.
How long until one realizes coal jobs are obsolete and you need specialized training for a job in the 21st?
That a wall will not do the job but surveillance tech and more man power can improve illegal immigration?
Two years isn't enough?
Three years?
Four years?
I don't think you have that long, meanwhile, people who work for the government are going without pay. That's making American great again, right?
Last edited by r3gul8r; 2019-01-07 at 09:25 PM. Reason: Deleted photo
Evil is cancelling the money paying for a sick child in hospital, WHO HAPPENS TO BE THE GRANDCHILD OF YOUR BROTHER, simply because the child's parent is arguing the will of their grandparent is unfair because it cut them entirely out. A will written by a man suffering dementia, but was being "helped" by his dear old son, Donald.
No. Making an innocent child suffer because someone questioned that you tampered with a will and would like to get some inheritance is pretty damn evil.
- - - Updated - - -
It might look that way. It helps that republicans with any moral decency couldn't stand being on the side of the current administration.
Add the fact that the wall was just a talking point Roger Stone insisted Trump put in his speeches so he doesn't forget to mention immigration and you really wonder what it is we're all fighting about.
In any case, $5B would be wonderful if it were to be used for increased processing ability for asylum seekers, more staff to pursue those who overstay visas, etc. But that's not what he wants.
Exactly. That's why Democrats have already won the argument, as I stated. I also stated my position that I could see a valid point in allowing the shutdown to happen, exactly because Trump said he'd take the blame. The shutdown occurred, and because it happened Trump gets blamed. The points, as you will, have been scored. Now, over time, the actual ramifications will begin. That is, severe damage to Democrat voters federal workers, and some sparsely to others. Democrats scored the points, and Trump has already lost all he can on this issue, from a political stand-point, I believe the Democrats only direction to go on this is down. If the hostages of this situation were farmers, I'd say go for it Democrats, play your political game of denying all funding for a wall. However, because the people being hurt by this are a majority their voters, I'd say they better be careful, because they're sacrificing the lives of their own voters based only on principle, because surely it's not about the actual cost.
So many arm chair politicians in this forum that think they know what's best for this country. You won't even notice the wall fund in your taxes.
What I don't understand is how can any of you discredit what Border Patrol agents/CBP Officers/Air and Marine agents say when we are the ones down here experiencing it first hand?
You do remember the child that actually shut down the government in 2013, right? It was Ted Cruz. He shut it down, to try to stop funding for Obamacare that was already funded, there was no stopping it. You think it was Obama's fault? You are on crack if you think it was Obama's fault.
- - - Updated - - -
He promised a wall, that Mexico would pay for, not the US people.