The real question is wtf is Thrall doing
Thrall is doing the correct thing in keeping his ass out of this trashfire of an expansion.
"It's 2013 and I still view the internet on a 560x192 resolution monitor!"
Nathanos has always been an asshole. It's nothing new.
I seriously dislike the Forsaken leadership in general and part of that is that literally none of them look like the bulk of the Forsaken. Sylvanas of course gets to keep being a sexy elf with running mascara whose cinematic model gets more gorgeous with every appearance. Nathanos is literally a human with red eyes and a pilfered Kul Tiran jacket. The Horde's Warfront commander is a Night Elf who had her traditional Night Elf armor dyed black and started hanging out at Hot Topic.
I'd like a Forsaken leader that looks like them- rotting flesh, protruding bones, maggots crawling through their belly, the whole deal. The asshats in charge getting to be special snowflakes who emulate Alliance races is boring.
Last edited by Jastall; 2019-01-29 at 10:56 PM.
Because
1.) He doesn't self-insert himself.
2.) He doesn't even have the agency to self-insert himself, he is not the sole writer of the game, or even of Nathanos.
3.) Nathanos is not overpowered and has lost every major engagement against other lore characters he's been involved with.
4.) You call this writer 'cringey', but the only one cringey is you. Glass houses.
....No? Nothing about any of this is an opinion, nor subjective.
Objective fact: He does not write the game by himself, he does not have the agency to make Nathanos a mary sue. This is a fact.
Objective fact: Nathanos simply is not overpowered. He's powerful, and his backstory might be tipping the scales of SO COOL EPIC MARY SUE just a little bit, but so do all of the Warcraft characters. They're all stupid broken op cunts with stupid masturbatory backstories. Tyrande is Elune's chosen? Malfurion is DA BEST DRUID EVER? Illidan is the epic cool over-focused golden child who does no wrong? Anduin is almost an outright mary sue? But Nathanos is the issue just because a short story said he was the only human as good as an elf? Loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool. Nathanos has lost every major fight he's been in. This is a fact.
Cringe?
Nathanos can't be Danuser's self-insert character because Nathanos, his personality and his backstory, were all created long before Danuser was part of the team. The only thing about Nathanos directly tied to Danuser is his new model (which was designed to look just a little like the person) and the short story "Dark Mirror." Danuser made an admittedly cringy post gushing about the homage and now people believe he 100% created the character somehow. None of the major WoW characters are managed by singular authors or writers - every single one of them has various influences, flourishes, and accents plied onto them by about half a dozen people or more.
The character hasn't undergone some significant change in the hands of Danuser, Golden, or anyone else on the writing team. His snarkiness, curmudgeonliness, his affection for Sylvanas, and his status as a Ranger hearken back all the way to Classic WoW.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
what 'good' ? from start he talks about how maiev miss Teldrassil, maiev didn't set foot in teldrassil until way later after illidan events, not to mention how he butcher almost everything regarding everyone, don't make sense, don't try to make sense
i won't say his events aren't canon, but he is without doubt worst writer i read for
The beginning of wisdom is the statement 'I do not know.' The person who cannot make that statement is one who will never learn anything. And I have prided myself on my ability to learn
Thrall
http://youtu.be/x3ejO7Nssj8 7:20+ "Alliance remaining super power", clearly blizz favor horde too much, that they made alliance the super power
I don't recall the events with Maiev you're referring to, so you'd have to point out a specific page or passage to me. Other than that the characterizations seemed fine and pretty in keeping with how the characters were at the time of WC3 and WC3: TFT up until TBC. It also gives an explanation as to why Illidan's characterization changed between WC3: TFT and TBC, which definitely helps TBC make more sense (at least to a degree).
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead