Users with <20 posts and ignored shitposters are automatically invisible. Find out how to do that here and help clean up MMO-OT!
PSA: Being a volunteer is no excuse to make a shite job of it.
Users with <20 posts and ignored shitposters are automatically invisible. Find out how to do that here and help clean up MMO-OT!
PSA: Being a volunteer is no excuse to make a shite job of it.
I am sticking with facts. That was the first paragraph you ignored. The second paragraph is my opinion on people not paying their taxes. You can ignore that if you like, but why ignore the first paragraph? You're really just emotionally dialed in to whinge about this no matter the logic behind it. You don't care... I should pay so these irresponsible people can keep their dog. Yeah, sure man... how about you put your money where your mouth is and pay my bit for me? How about that?
Users with <20 posts and ignored shitposters are automatically invisible. Find out how to do that here and help clean up MMO-OT!
PSA: Being a volunteer is no excuse to make a shite job of it.
There's so many things to say about this.
A. I don't feel pity for people who bought a $750+ dog, but can't pay their bills.
B. Normally I would say taking a pet away from people should only be done if it's for the pets well-being, but I could maybe see a case if you were buying crazy expensive pets to avoid paying debt or something. I'm not presented with enough information to know if this was the case or not.
C. If the story is to be believed then the dog had some serious expensive medical issues that the original family would not have been able to pay for and perhaps they weren't caring for the dog properly?
D. The person that bought the dog is suing because of having to pay for medical bills for the dog whereas the initial feel I got from the story was they were trying to make it come of as suing because of the family situation.
Last edited by Raging Fungus; 2019-03-01 at 12:10 AM.
Animals aren't property. BGB 90a states so.
Animals are excluded from seizures. Exceptions are made if the dog is of high value.
To everyone bitching about how they could do such a "cruel" thing:
Those fuckers had debts, got several different household items seized and still didn't pay their debts.
People like that who even think it's ok to buy expensive animals even tho they KNOW that they can't afford it are the cruel assholes here.
Thing is, was it a mixed breed/ mongrel, they got from a friend or so, nobody probably would have given a damn. But a dog, costing nearly 2000 dollar are completely different matters, which is, generally, like jewelry, expesive cars/ clothings... not something, a family in debt has.
Users with <20 posts and ignored shitposters are automatically invisible. Find out how to do that here and help clean up MMO-OT!
PSA: Being a volunteer is no excuse to make a shite job of it.
"Initially, a wheelchair from the Stefanie spouse seemed to have the most value, but because the wheelchair was owned by an insurance company"
I think the fact that he is handicapped and not just some lazy bum has relevance, especially because they considered taking the guys wheelchair.
You know.. when equality meant we make paraplegic people responsible for their actions, that hasn't occurred to people before, has it? He's not brain damaged, he can get help from the state. All it takes is a phone call and rolling your wheel chair to the authorities. I don't see how his condition matters concerning the dog. About the wheelchair? Yes, that's outrageous... but somehow these emotionally unstable people only want to talk about the dog. Seems strange to me...
Users with <20 posts and ignored shitposters are automatically invisible. Find out how to do that here and help clean up MMO-OT!
PSA: Being a volunteer is no excuse to make a shite job of it.
Seizing pets to pay debts? How the fuck is that legal? No way in hell I’d let my hounds be stolen off me by greedy debt collectors.
Why are we taking this to emotional level Slant didn't take dog. He didn't create the circumstances the dog was taken. That was the owner you seem to be advocating loved the dog do much.
I also think Slant understands the emotional part of this by what he's written. I agree it was a dick move. But yeah this isn't about morality it's about the law.
The owner rules and his family like the dog are being punished for it.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
Police agent Michaela Jordan.
For those outside eu. Thats not now law works regarding debts to whoever they may be. The only way anyone can take something from you is if its a clear signed contract where you give your rights to specific assets in case of inability to repay a debt. Theres no nazi michael jordan stealing your family pug for the glory of the evil eu. If you owe taxes and debt to the state the worse you're gonna get is a lock on bank accounts and official revenues.
Thanks Michaela Jordan but also wheres the german link? All I found is a bogus netherlands link to this crap.
Iam gonna end by saying though i dont know the full case this should never have been allowed to get this far where they was thinking about taking a wheel chair but instead decided to take and sell a family pet.
I know how brutal bailiffs can be and i know how much petty jobsworths at county councils can be (My HOA would make Stalins USSR seem like a liberal paradise!)
This shouldve been settled amicable on both sides with a reasonable debt reconstruction where the disabled guy could make payments that is reasonable to clear the debt.