Anybody who was scrutinizing and paying attention knew this years ago. It was clear sometime around mid-2017 that this wasn't the conspiracy we were worried about, but a politically-motivated attack against a candidate who wasn't supposed to win. A cottage industry rose up that fed people what they wanted to hear: Trump is even worse than you thought. Treasonous, conspiring with foreign agents to rig our elections. The death penalty for some involved could be on the table, some said. This drove clicks, it drove revenue, and it drove the narrative. But anybody who was paying attention realized what this was a long, long time ago.
You'll still see people clinging to it, because what's the alternative? To say what you just said? Never. This is a political war with no rules of engagement. So the formerly-pristine Mueller, the paragon of professionalism with his own cult following complete with reverent T-shirts suddenly needs to be subpoenaed to find out what he's not telling us. They don't really believe any of that, the people pushing this, but as I said, this is a political war. And it's profitable.
Not directed at you, exactly, because I don't know how active you were during this whole ordeal, but part of me wants to revel and gloat in the fact that I spent so much time trying to explain all this to people here on this board, to extreme blowback, only to be completely vindicated. But there's no joy here. Trump didn't "collude" with a foreign government to steal the election. Great. I would hope that would be a given. I'm bothered about what @badzerath has talked about: The weaponization of our investigative agencies by the Executive in charge. There's a lot of cleaning house that needs to be done. And if the Obama administration wasn't above reproach, certainly the Trump administration wouldn't be. We should all be concerned about the events that precipitated this entire investigation.
Dontrike/Shadow Priest/Black Cell Faction Friend Code - 5172-0967-3866
That's not what the letter about the report said, so I'm not really sure why you're saying that. I'll reiterate: the quote from the report says the SCO "did not establish" which is pretty specific wording which means, "beyond a reasonable doubt." That's not the same as the SCO saying they don't have "clear and convincing" evidence, or that the "preponderance of the evidence" doesn't say trump conspired with foreign powers to undermine the legitimacy of the election, both of which, are standards of proof that are also used in the US legal system (and one is used far more commonly than "beyond a reasonable doubt"). There's no jeopardy of prison time for impeachment hearings, so I don't know why people default to the "beyond a reasonable doubt" burden of proof here (by people, I don't mean the SCO, as they were investigating the issues as if they were going to be prosecuted in criminal court... as they were bringing criminal suits).
Oh boohoo for the criminal also that were caught. Perhaps they should try less illegal activity if they are so worried about their jobs and livelihoods.
"
Won't someone think of the poor rich criminals!
- - - Updated - - -
We literally don't have the report and you're ignoring the "doesn't exonerate" part.
Dontrike/Shadow Priest/Black Cell Faction Friend Code - 5172-0967-3866
Pretty much exactly what I said.
We can't rely on the USA's support. Trump is constantly threatening to withdraw from strategic alliances, he's engaging in economic attacks against allies through tariffs and the like, he's cozying up to dictators and enemies of his supposed allies and treating them more gently than those allies. If that standard can be set with Trump, who I see as merely dangerously incompetent, how much worse could it be with someone truly malicious? There are no checks or balances; if there were, we wouldn't still be discussing Trump in 2019.
The USA hasn't become our enemy. But they have also shown that they cannot be trusted as a friend, anymore, either.
Why are against it fully coming out?
- - - Updated - - -
I knew you'd come back, but unfortunately you are ignoring the "doesn't exonerate" part. Would you be opposed to the entire report being released?
Even if Trump is innocent of everything, which is impossible, he's still a shitty president with nothing positive to his name during his entire presidency.
Dontrike/Shadow Priest/Black Cell Faction Friend Code - 5172-0967-3866
Ignoring for now the dissonance between those two positions, how would you advise allies of the United States to proceed? How exactly do you treat a nation that you deem to be a "potential major international threat"? What other nations would you classify the same way, as a "potential major international threat"?
Not to speak for Endus, but as a Canadian, if yours is a country that would legitimately elect Donald Trump as president on a platform of protectionism, racism, and pants on head stupid economics, you're filing yourself firmly in the "not to be trusted" category in the eyes of the free world beside president postliterate bestwords' pen pal Kim Jong Un.
If Donald Trump cheated to steal the presidency through the influence of a foreign power, and despite taking 22 months to investigate you hauled his ass off to prison for the rest of his natural life, expunged all of his co-conspirators, and then promptly returned to relative sanity in governance, then "this was a dark chapter in American history and we know it will take time to rebuild our trust..." seems like a plausible start to mending the alliances that president very stable genius has been splintering for the last 2 years.
Not much to argue about with your first paragraph with the exception of protectionism and ill advised economic policy doesnt exactly equate to not trusting your oldest ally, your second paragraph is, I'm sorry to say, complete drivel. You see, we have a thing called the rule of law. We dont send anyone to prison without a trial. Also I don't know what you mean by "expunge". Are you using it in the legal sense or colloquially. I'm not sure you're using it properly in any sense.
Edit - Also "cheating" isnt' against the law. If you want to send someone to jail for the rest of their life, it's helpful to cite what law you think they're guilty of.
Last edited by Merkava; 2019-03-25 at 04:13 AM.
Here's one from NYT about Trump ordering Kushner to be given a security clearance despite concerns from people around him, including John Kelly
WAPO article of the same
Here's a story about his use of Whatsapp for government business
Another one
I mean, google is your friend. However, judging by your posts so far, you aren't interested in honest debate.. this thread isn't about Hillary so you are engaging in whataboutism to deflect away from Trump.
See, this here is a horrible reason for anyone to celebrate Trump being exonerated. If a piece of trash like Trump got elected fairly, then there's something legit wrong with the people who voted for him. The only "sane" reason people would've voted for him would be to watch the world burn.
Trump is not a good businessman, let alone a good person. He has zero idea how to actually be a president, that much has been made clear by his time in office. He misuses the military, negatively affects the US's relationship with other countries due to his personality alone, not counting all the shitty acts he's pulled off by acting buddy-buddy with goddamn dictators like the leader of NK and least of all, he is a threat to national security due to his irresponsibility by using his personal, old and non-secure cell phone for political calls.
This ignores all the nepotism with his daughter doing political work that she has no experience or reason to be a part of, plus she and her husband getting security clearance without being cleared.
Oh, and for some reason, most people have no problem with Trump actively making money via his businesses being used by people both in the government and other countries trying to curry his favor for political gain.
You appear to be slightly confused about what is happening.
Mueller has not said anything publicly, nor handed out anything to the public. He submitted his entire report to the AG (William Barr). Said report has not been publicly released.
What we have publicly available is a supposed summary (written without consulting Mueller) of that report produced by the AG, who has been involved in Republican crimes (e.g. Iran-Contra) going back to Reagan and H.W. Bush and who doesn't even think it's possible for the president to obstruct justice.
I don't know about you, but I don't regard such a man as being particularly credible.
Last edited by Masark; 2019-03-25 at 04:56 AM.
Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mindMe on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW charactersOriginally Posted by Howard Tayler
There's no dissonance, there's a difference between "being a potential threat" and "being our overt enemy".
For instance, Russia today isn't an overt enemy of most Western nations. We aren't at war with Russia. However, tensions are high, and I think it's clear Russia is behaving badly, in ways that put that peace at risk. Russia might be a bit further along that spectrum that what I meant to imply, but there's no comparably influential nation I could point to that would provide a similar analogy.
Last edited by Merkava; 2019-03-25 at 05:08 AM.
Democrats began desperately trying to blame anyone but themselves for losing the presidency to a joke of a game show host & finally settled on a foreign villain & here we are, 2 1/2 years later, with all of it exposed as a scam but so much damage done.
The US is a threat to it's allies, since it is currently proudly stating that it's word is without value because nobody can force it to keep it.
But the biggest threat? Hardly. For all that a small minority of Americans wet their panties at the thought of the US nuking every single non-American city in the world, that's REALLY not going to happen any time soon. The US will absolutely hurt it's allies just to prove that it can do so without repercussion, but there are still countries that outright want to murder everyone else and they're still worse.