Bercow just took Greg Hands and made him look a complete idiot there
Bercow just took Greg Hands and made him look a complete idiot there
And now they're playing children's shouting matches again... they do realise they're standing right at the cliff's edge, don't they? They got exactly one shot left, if they fuck this up while discussing Bercow's comments I don't see how anyone can not blame MPs for this mess as much as May.
Users with <20 posts and ignored shitposters are automatically invisible. Find out how to do that here and help clean up MMO-OT!
PSA: Being a volunteer is no excuse to make a shite job of it.
Do controversial bullshit and see controversial bullshit happening. I mean, seriously, politicians in the UK, as much as I prefer none of them come to harm, are EVERY BIT as responsible for this mess as the people think. And as we say in Germany, put 'em all in a sack and start clubbing, you can't hit the wrong one.
Users with <20 posts and ignored shitposters are automatically invisible. Find out how to do that here and help clean up MMO-OT!
PSA: Being a volunteer is no excuse to make a shite job of it.
The actual motion had a larger majority than the amendment, looks like the no's had two abstains.
- - - Updated - - -
Jeez, one of the Conservative rebels against the Government was Boris Johnson's brother. That I didn't see coming.
Jo Johnson has basically been the anti Boris in the commons since the whole brexit shit started, he resigned from government back in December because he wants a second vote on the matter. I wouldn't have been shocked if when the 3 tories joined TIG if he had thoughts about it.
13/11/2022 Sir Keir Starmer. "Brexit is safe in my hands, Let me be really clear about Brexit. There is no case for going back into the EU and no case for going into the single market or customs union. Freedom of movement is over"
The government did nothing of the sort. The government said that it would not commit to enacting the result of the indicative vote before they are tabled.
In fact, the PM said that the government will not ignore the indicative votes. Lidington said that the Government respected the results of the previous votes on preventing "No Deal" and extending Brexit beyond 29 March and that the House can expect to not be ignored.
The government said the opposite of what you say it said. So you are lying.
Users with <20 posts and ignored shitposters are automatically invisible. Find out how to do that here and help clean up MMO-OT!
PSA: Being a volunteer is no excuse to make a shite job of it.
Imagine if Downing St was on the monopoly board Boris probably gets stuck with Whitehall and doesn't get anywhere until he quits in a rage and wants to be the banker.
Coated with teflon to ensure nothing sticks.It's funny how he wants to set it up so he gets someone to blame later. So transparent, those Brexiteers.
Really? I mean really? Do I have to source everything?
Government could ignore indicative Brexit votes, says Liam Fox :- International trade secretary says real choice is still between Theresa May’s deal and no deal
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-says-liam-fox
Perhaps you were ill-informed, mistaken when you said I was lying. No apology necessary or expected.
13/11/2022 Sir Keir Starmer. "Brexit is safe in my hands, Let me be really clear about Brexit. There is no case for going back into the EU and no case for going into the single market or customs union. Freedom of movement is over"
The rather more senior minister David Lidington (the de facto deputy PM) said this evening of previous votes in the House (he references "no to no-deal" and "extension of leave date"):
"Neither [vote] was legally binding - but in each case the government has honoured the wishes of the House. I hope that might provide a modicum of assurance that in this government we don't intend to be dismissive of what the House decides."
I raise you David Lidington and give you one Theresa May, who said this afternoon...
Theresa May told MPs this afternoon she could not guarantee that she would commit to implementing anything they voted for in an indicative process because they could involve an 'outcome that is un-negotiable with the EU'. She added: 'No government could give a blank cheque to commit to an outcome without knowing what it is. So I cannot commit the Government to delivering the outcome of any votes held by this House, but I do commit to engaging constructively with this process'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...a-Commons.html
You can go higher? At best you have a sympathetic ear from headmistress May who will politely listen to her errant schoolboys, while ignoring every word they say.
No apology needed or expected, I was not lying, as surely you can see.
13/11/2022 Sir Keir Starmer. "Brexit is safe in my hands, Let me be really clear about Brexit. There is no case for going back into the EU and no case for going into the single market or customs union. Freedom of movement is over"
Users with <20 posts and ignored shitposters are automatically invisible. Find out how to do that here and help clean up MMO-OT!
PSA: Being a volunteer is no excuse to make a shite job of it.
Is there a clear majority now for either a softer or hard brexit, since it is hard to keep up?