Brie Larson never said anything that suggested anything of the sort.
She noticed the lack of diversity in the press pool, and noted that she would like to see a broader diversity of opinions in movie reviewing. She wasn't arguing against any particular movie reviewer, for being a white guy. Anyone taking it that way came into this with their axe pre-ground, wanting to find something to feign outrage over.
This "comic craze" that has been a solid tentpole of cinema for a good 30 years or so.
And that's if I'm being generous and acknowledging that comic-book-based films were released less frequently in the '80s than the '90s onward, which excludes the earlier Superman film series, which was generally pretty darned popular.
While I agree fads come and go, but it's not like people are looking back to say the OT of Star Wars and saying man we were so dumb for liking this. Or looking back to the BTTF trilogy or other things like that. I think movies are a little more future proof than say POGS or beanie babies and shit.
I mean I am biased because overall I like the MCU, but I might have less interest after Endgame ends. They are generally decent popcorn flicks that have likeable enough characters and an ok story. Remakes of movies and live action adaptations I will totally agree with, they need to stop. But the MCU overall is keeping things fresh and still expanding on their universe, so I am ok for now with it.
Realistically though comic book movies have been doing ok since what probably the first Superman movie back in the late 70's. Batman movies, Blade series, X-men series and I might be forgetting more. If we take that into account, that is almost 40 years of comic book movies. I only see it really slowing down if they start to reboot the same character over and over again like with Spiderman. Homecoming was a breath of fresh air for that character as was Bale's Batman at the time.
Last edited by crono14; 2019-04-09 at 08:36 PM.
Yeah, let's go with the full quote, rather than cherry-picking one pit out of context.
"Am I saying I hate white dudes? No, I’m not. I don’t want to hear what a white man has to say about A Wrinkle in Time. I want to hear what a woman of color, a biracial woman has to say about the film. I want to hear what teenagers think about the film. If you make a movie that is a love letter to women of color, there is a chance that a woman of color does not have access to review and critique your film. Do not say the talent is not there, because it is."
She's clearly talking about the lack of diversity in the press pool, about movie reviewers, and particularly, when the film has themes that will speak more-directly to people with different heritage.
It wasn't an attack on white dudes, at all. You have to cut out half her comment and misrepresent what's left to twist her words to kinda maybe look like that. Anyone taking it that way, like I said, had pre-determined they were going to take offense to anything that didn't stroke the metaphorical egos of white dudes, and was looking for something to get mad about.
Ignoring the greater context is, effectively, an attempt to lie.
It's like if I were to say "among Neo-Nazis, it's common for people to get tattoos with Nazi symbolism, like an '88', which refers to 'H' being the 8th letter of the alphabet, and thus acting as a code for 'Heil Hitler."
And you quoted me saying "Heil Hitler", and pretended I was a Nazi for saying that.
That's a lie. You can't cut out the context without completely changing what I said. Same with Larson's quote. Which does not say what you're trying to make it say.
That's the thing, people like endus and the op do think that's acceptable thing, their indoctrinated by modern social queues because of what's happened in the past. And then vehemently deny it or twist around their own flaws unable to see their just as bigoted based on race as the racist groups they so despise
#boycottchina
The thing is that, as it was for the ghostbusters case, haters yelling everywhere on the internet about a movie makes people who weren't even paying attention aware of the movie in question. People who weren't even interested in seeing the movie in the first place now might wanna see what the fuss is all about.
She literally said she wants less white men at the viewing party or some viewing event, doesn't matter what it was. It was a stupid thing to say and not the first time she said something of the sort.
Don't make claims about what people said when you have no clue what they said.
BTW lack of diversity is only a thing if you are racist. Non racist people don't care about the ratio of skin color involved in anything, only racist people push quotas because that's a decision based entirely on race and nothing else.
anything with the marvel logo on it will make money even if the movie is crap. its domestic sales numbers is almost same as spiderman 3
"Anti-SJW" tends to be code for backwards shitstains. At least they also tend to be very vocal with their pretend status in this world so they're easy to weed out.
No, they don't accomplish anything. Ghostbusters 2016 wouldn't have been a good movie with an all-male cast. The upcoming Ghostbusters movie will have representation (kids, adults, men, women, girls, boys, skin tones) out the wazoo and it will be good or bad based on the script and execution same as always.
It's quite hilarious to boot that "ant-SJWs" always screech about wanting to keep politics out of entertainment, but it's always been a part of that scene. Always. Being able to watch a movie without caring about the real life politics of the actors involved has sort of been an exercise since forever.
Last edited by Queen of Hamsters; 2019-04-09 at 08:58 PM.
Female empowerment for the sake of female empowerment is stupid.
That being said - Cpt Marvel was great. THAT is how you do a strong female character. You just make a strong female character... full stop. You don't have to denigrate men or make unrealistic leaps to show how tough women are.
Just make STRONG, REASONABLE women characters.
Proud of Marvel and Hollywood for Cpt Marvel.
I think I've had enough of removing avatars today that feature girls covered in semen. Closing.
-Darsithis
To be fair, i think that movies that push it too much are bound to fail as they are not trying to make a good movie, just fill a "missing" spot.
So.... i'm ok with movies trying to do "noble things" (is for money in the end, so not that noble -and the idea of noble per se is questionable), but when they try to exagerate, it ends up like The Ghostbusters
You have to try really hard to be offended by that once the full quote has been given to you. What was basically said is "I don't want to hear from person of X heritage when a film is written to resonate with people of Y heritage." It takes the most delicate of snowflakes to think that is an attack on people of X heritage.
Last edited by Dhrizzle; 2019-04-09 at 09:02 PM.
fucking christ you people are stupid.....
Let me ask you this shithead..If I wanted to know how the recent Tyler Perry Movie did...Would I ask a fucking White Mans opinion on it.....No....
If you were to ask most black people...who were the major audience how they liked the Tyler perry movies...a lot of them probably liked it...But general reviews probably would dog the fuck out of it..
theres only one captain marvel and his name is billy batson