Last edited by Varvara Spiros Gelashvili; 2019-04-09 at 09:14 PM.
Violence Jack Respects Women!
I don't think I'd call Rogue 1 great but it's easily the best of the Disney star wars movies IMO.
As a counterpoint, a movie can be made for a specific heritage/race/religion, etc.. While it would be insensitive to publicly declare that "it was made for them" I don't believe it would be racist (or whatever-ist) to state it. The "I don't want to hear from blah people" statement by Brie was just kind of a brain dead moment for her
Also a few people seeing empty theaters doesn't mean Disney is faking box office returns. Anecdotes on the internet don't prove a national or global trend.
Violence Jack Respects Women!
I haven't watched movies in a long time. Well I tried to watch some recently but they were so fucking awful i just couldn't. Think i made it almost an hour through 'thor ragnarok'. I got a half hour into that latest avengers film before turning it off. I think even if I didn't know the opinions of rich millionaire celebrities wanting to destroy our nations through division on social media, I still couldn't watch movies anymore targeted to the 18 - 35yr old demographic. Its like that episode of south park where everything just sounds like literal shit.
I should watch that latest blade runner film though that looks pretty good and the first movie is great.
Give me a good 80's classic action film anyday for something dumb to watch than cape shit.
But thats bad according to todays generation of weaklings. Haven't watched this film either but it looks funny.
“to wear an improper expression on your face was itself a punishable offence. There was even a word for it in Newspeak: FACECRIME, it was called.”
That sounds pretty racist, dude.
No, what people imply is that Disney bought a bunch of tickets in cinemas to fake a great opening weekend, thus inflating the opening and drawing more people into cinemas. One basis for this is that apperantly the movie as an absurdly high marketing cost, or whatever.
I really couldn't care less how many people disagree with the truth.
The full context makes her comment completely unobjectionable. Unless you're really looking to raise a stink and aren't uncomfortable with lying about what Larson said.
My example took something out of context.Your comparison here is also logically flawed in a way that makes you a damn liar. The mechanics of your example are nowhere near close to the thing you're trying to defend.
Your argument about Larson takes something out of context.
It's the same thing, you just don't want to admit it, because it makes it clear that you're not acting in good faith.
"Colorblind" in the sense of not being prejudiced against someone is fine.
What you are talking about is a refusal to acknowledge and understand other people's viewpoints and how their experiences might differ from your own, which is itself discriminatory. It's a form of racism, itself.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/b...is-form-racism
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...uctive/405037/
https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-...r-blind-racism
Ignoring context is not addressing context. And your argument for "colorblindness" is nothing but a desire to ignore context, to (ahem) whitewash racial issues out of the rhetoric entirely, and maintain the imbalanced status quo as-is, while dismissing the complaints of those it unfairly works against.
No.
She didn't.
Lying about what she said is not an argument.
I would say "No" to the anti-SJW movement having any real effect on anything really. They're positively deranged in their vitriol towards social justice.
Just a bunch of whiny dudes and dudettes.
These outrages also serve as HUGE amount of free advertisement for these movies.
- Dare not to sleep -
I really don't mind diversity, but i do dislike diversity for it's own sake.
I don't go to movies for diversity or social programming, I go to be ENTERTAINED; and I don't find being force fed an agenda to be entertaining.
So call me one of them, see if I care, I vote with my wallet and don't worry about it one way or another.
"There are other sites on the internet designed for people to make friends or relationships. This isn't one" Darsithis Super Moderator
Proof that the mmochamp community can be a bitter and lonely place. What a shame.
Just a reminder, just because you believe your opinion, doesn't make it the truth, even if you're backing it up with credible evidence. Because at the end of the day, you cannot see into the mind/heart of Brie Larson, to, with 100% accuracy, determine what the intent was behind her statements. You can only provide a well educated guess/opinion based on what was said and context.
Whiiich was basically a bullshit excuse for how bad the film was and the critical panning it was getting. I honestly think that studios are exacerbating the "Anti-SJW" crowd and making it its own bogeyman. A lot of it (bar the obvious overly active trolls) is just reactions to the studios crap. Dismissing it all as some anti-sjw agenda hurts everybody in the long run.
These are things that are pissing off fans (Sorry, I mean "offending overentitled white fanboys") that studios KEEP doing. They need to cut out all this shit -
Pretending something is "New" or "Fresh" because you've swapped the gender/ethnicity of characters.
Ghostbusters was a shitty remake nobody wanted, and Doctor Who is a series that's barely changed it's formula in literally half a century. If the next James Bond is black it will still just be ANOTHER James Bond movie rather than something original. Come up with something new please!
Blaming peoples dislike of your crap by calling them all bigots.
Marvel added a whole load of new "diverse" titles, with new writers ranging from YA writers to bloggers. Some were great some were direly crap. I'm happy for new writers to have a shot but there was a lot at once and too much was low quality... so Marvel basically called all their fans racists who hated diversity . TLJ almost felt like it was deliberately trolling it's fanbase in places but, again, if people had issues with it they were obviously entitled racists or sexists.
Ignoring history to pretend you're radically progressive
It was a joke with Wonderwoman that so many reviewers were exclaiming her the first female action hero and action-role model for girls. "Finally a girl that can kick-ass and lead a movie'. Forgetting that the "Action-girl" trope is so massively overdone that it's a cliche, and there have been large amounts of action films lead by women (even whole franchises like Resident Evil and Underworld). Similarly, if you know anything about Star Trek, when the producers made a big announcement (before anything else on the show was even known) that they were FINALLY having a female + African American in a prominent roll, it's not really a surprise that a lot of the fanbase eyerolled.
Ignoring history to pretend everyone's bigoted
Carrying on with Wonderwoman, there was this great push that it "wasn't for white-men", the same with Black Panther, and Larsons ill thought out comments. White men have always only read comics and flims with white men and now have to get used to the change, they say. But comics and sci-fi fans have always tended to be hugely more progressive than most. The biggest comic during the 80s-90s was about a team being led for a long time by an African woman. We're also forgetting that the entire comic book movie boom was started with the huge success of the Blade movie and his ethnicity was never an issue. When people say Black Panther "isn't for white men" do they not realise that over the past half century the majority of his reader + fanbase have been white males?
Last edited by rogueMatthias; 2019-04-09 at 09:34 PM.
BASIC CAMPFIRE for WARCHIEF UK Prime Minister!
My neighbour reads a comic book featuring a talking, funny moose named Hälge. You'd think he loves Moose and could never harm them.
He still goes out into the woods and shoots Moose dead once per year.
Just because they've seen a diverse roster in fictional settings, doesn't mean they can't be bigots in relation to real people.
I don't see why Black Panther wouldn't be for White people though. It has the White Saviour trope, just a bit less defined than The Help or Hidden Figures. Same as how Wonder Woman has the Born Sexy yesterday and Muh Love Interest-tropes.
There was? I've never seen anything like that. I've seen 'important to the black community' and 'milestone for female fans everywhere', but nothing that indicated that the makers of both movies didn't make them for the usual comic book movie crowd. Which includes people of all races and sexes. Same with Captain Marvel, only difference compared to WW and BP is that it was a mediocre movie at best.
The beginning of wisdom is the statement 'I do not know.' The person who cannot make that statement is one who will never learn anything. And I have prided myself on my ability to learn
Thrall
http://youtu.be/x3ejO7Nssj8 7:20+ "Alliance remaining super power", clearly blizz favor horde too much, that they made alliance the super power
Soooo this is all like EU (legacy? legends? fuck i dont even know what to call it anymore fuck you mickey mouse) stuff, because in terms of the movies yes would can assume that all droids are sentient...but for most part NO they are not. however, when a droid does become sentient, that droid has generally looked at the state of droids around them and then go on organic killing rampages of death until they are destroyed. So the practice of routine memory wiping is commonplace, the restraining bolt tech and yeah the "obedience" programming. i think it had been few 100 years since the last droid uprising by the time of movies. So who knows. its a sci fi fantasy universe. But personally id say Droids are not made sentient but every droid can become sentient.
"It doesn't matter if you believe me or not but common sense doesn't really work here. You're mad, I'm mad. We're all MAD here."