I'd be really interested in watching the people opposed to modern WoW's accessibility options being in Classic trying to explain their opinion to the people who rely on those features to allow them to play the game.
It became clear that it wasn’t realistic to try to get the audience back to being more hardcore, as it had been in the past. -- Tom Chilton
It became clear that it wasn’t realistic to try to get the audience back to being more hardcore, as it had been in the past. -- Tom Chilton
Yes. I want pristine pixel perfect copy of vanilla WoW. Museum. Not vanilla-inspired game. You don't just change something in museum because it makes sense. You preserve everything, as it was originally. Good and bad things.
- - - Updated - - -
If you think that everyone should crawl before disabled people, you're wrong. I don't care about them. It's their problem. Definitely not something worth of changes.
I mean Classic from a technical standpoint has already had a vast amount of changes. So I guess people who are so uptight about a single miniscule change won't be playing it. Which I guess is a blessing.
8.0 Client.
Battle.net support.
Updated to support modern hardware, software systems and widescreen support.
Will no longer support Windows Vista or lower as Blizzard have been phasing out older Operating Systems from games as have most devs. And because supporting them are basically security risks.
Accessibility features being added.
Supposedly built into the current client as a server option rather than a separate client (may not be)
List goes on. I'd happily take these updates over potential security risks to my Battle.net account such as running it on 2004 hardware/software. "Preservation" only gets you so far. At it's core it's still Vanilla. But anyone who thought they were going to be running it on a Windows 98 PC with a Geforce 3 and Pentium 4 well just lol....
Last edited by Eleccybubb; 2019-04-21 at 12:20 PM.