You said that the report shows clear obstruction. I said show me. You give me an opinion piece. I didn't ask for someone else's opinion - I want to know where YOU find there is clear obstruction from the Mueller report. You're taking someone's word for it. I've read it...don't see it. What I did see was Mueller painting a picture of how he could be seen as obstructing and not obstructing based off of the intent sections that comes after evidence, analysis, nexus. That's why I pointed out what I did - "Case B" (Volume 2 - Page 24 I believe) states in the Intent section why that situation can be seen as not obstruction. You'd have to prove too much with a lack of evidence. So if Mueller himself offers why it can be seen as no obstruction how can you say that there is clear obstruction? It's not that easy.