Twitter won't treat White Supremacy like ISIS because it'd have to ban Republicans

[help helper]

[Has lost its way]

You're ignoring the main and important part, it's not the fucking color of the skin that makes their life good or bad.

No it goes much deeper but its extremely taboo in our society to admit that humans separated by thousands of years as a whole have slight deviations and are not identical.

[Release]

No it goes much deeper but its extremely taboo in our society to admit that humans separated by thousands of years as a whole have slight deviations and are not identical.

What nonsense. Americans love to ignore their own history. You would think a country with Jim Crow laws until the 1960's would understand the basic concept of how white supremacy can and does influence a society. The degree to which it does or doesn't exist is certainly up for debate but honestly you'd think reading some of the responses in this thread it's a complete fabrication.

[Software]

Pro-tip: Start with being honest, instead of party before reality.

You are trying to discuss with people that can only judge by emotions and who cheer someone who is extremely vulgar and a pathological liar. It's absolutely useless.

[VladimirM]

OP started this with "Twitter employee .... believes "

Lost all the credit after that.

[Exkrementor]

Care to link the politicians who were guilty of said fear mongering?

Just look at the reactions of lefties when Trump won the election. They cried and were devastated because they thought that the Trump regime would put them into concentration camps. Trump even did a speach shortly after the election and welcomed all the transwhatever people. But conveniently the left media just ignored that one.

It doesnt matter who said it and who you can quote on that. Fact is, the left thinks all these stupid things about Trump.

[szechuan]

Just look at the reactions of lefties when Trump won the election. They cried and were devastated because they thought that the Trump regime would put them into concentration camps. Trump even did a speach shortly after the election and welcomed all the transwhatever people. But conveniently the left media just ignored that one.

It doesnt matter who said it and who you can quote on that. Fact is, the left thinks all these stupid things about Trump.

You mean the same Republitard Birthers that claimed Obama wasn't born in Hawaii?

[Priestiality]

Just look at the reactions of lefties when Trump won the election. They cried and were devastated because they thought that the Trump regime would put them into concentration camps. Trump even did a speach shortly after the election and welcomed all the transwhatever people. But conveniently the left media just ignored that one.

It doesnt matter who said it and who you can quote on that. Fact is, the left thinks all these stupid things about Trump.

Words are wind. He can "give speeches welcoming transpeople" all he wants, the policy is what matters, and right now the right wing is pushing legislation all across the country that legalizes bigotry against the LGBTQ community under the guise of religious freedom.

[Kraenen]

Having internet.

Parents having more time to give their children support after school because they don't have to work 3 jobs.

I'd also add things like a better environment - things like leaded gas reduced IQ by several points and predicted criminal behavior, or endocrine disruptors which may be causing the decrease in testosterone, but others might plausibly disrupt hormones that lead to violent behavior.

[oplawlz]

This is very well said.

No, it really isn't. Neither of you have provided a valid counter argument other than "pfft, nu-uh!"

[Kraenen]

Just look at the reactions of lefties when Trump won the election. They cried and were devastated because they thought that the Trump regime would put them into concentration camps. Trump even did a speach shortly after the election and welcomed all the transwhatever people. But conveniently the left media just ignored that one.

It doesnt matter who said it and who you can quote on that. Fact is, the left thinks all these stupid things about Trump.

Is it welcoming to ban them from the military? Regardless of whether it's good policy or not, this does not scream "welcoming" to me, as you describe.

[Whitedragon]

The flame bait is heavy with this one.

[Kraenen]

Being more financially stable gives you advantages in life. A higher proportion of white people are financially stabled compared to black people. Therefore, a higher proportion of white people have certain advantages in life.

Are Asian privilege and Jewish privilege valid concepts in your view?

[Exkrementor]

Is it welcoming to ban them from the military? Regardless of whether it's good policy or not, this does not scream "welcoming" to me, as you describe.

It is pretty reasonable to ban trans people from the military. They have a suicide rate of 40% and that makes them per definition mentally sick. You dont want mentally sick people handling heavy arms and shit.

Also that is pretty much the only thing. They dont have to pay extra taxes, they dont get deported, they dont have to sit in the back of the bus. Its noting compared to what lefties thought would happen.

[Malaky]

No. It's not. They literally do not have access to all the same benefits in most cases as their counterparts. That is a blatant lack of opportunity. We're only talking about within the US so I don't know why you keep comparing it to other places.

Like what, exactly? What law or barrier is there that prevents people X from succeeding while not impeding or favouring Y?

- - - Updated - - -

Words are wind. He can "give speeches welcoming transpeople" all he wants, the policy is what matters, and right now the right wing is pushing legislation all across the country that legalizes bigotry against the LGBTQ community under the guise of religious freedom.

And right now the left wing is pushing legislation all across the country that legalizes bigotry against religious beliefs under the guise of respecting the LGBTQ community.


Look mommy, I can do it too!

[Kraenen]

It is pretty reasonable to ban trans people from the military. They have a suicide rate of 40% and that makes them per definition mentally sick. You dont want mentally sick people handling heavy arms and shit.

As I said: regardless of the merits of the policy, how do you argue that the military ban and the possible removals of healthcare protections is outweighed by Trump cluelessly waving around a flag (in terms of "welcoming" trans people)?

- - - Updated - - -

Like what, exactly? What law or barrier is there that prevents people X from succeeding while not impeding or favouring Y?

Why does there need to be a law when some basic stats show average rates are different for different groups of people?

[Malaky]

As I said: regardless of the merits of the policy

Except you can't do this.
You can't say "regardless of what makes the policy good" thus ignoring the whole point of the policy.

- - - Updated - - -

Why does there need to be a law when some basic stats show average rates are different for different groups of people?

Because that doesn't proves anything as those different rates could very well be the product of different choices.

Are you against free will and free choices?

[Kraenen]

Except you can't do this.
You can't say "regardless of what makes the policy good" thus ignoring the whole point of the argument.

The whole point was that Trump was somehow welcoming to trans people. This has yet to be proven, and the evidence I've pointed to contradicts this notion.

[Priestiality]

Like what, exactly? What law or barrier is there that prevents people X from succeeding while not impeding or favouring Y?

- - - Updated - - -



And right now the left wing is pushing legislation all across the country that legalizes bigotry against religious beliefs under the guise of respecting the LGBTQ community.


Look mommy, I can do it too!

Except I can actually back up my statement with facts. You can't.

Texas SB-17: Makes it legal for any licensed professional to refuse service to LGBTQ people on the grounds of "sincerely held religious beliefs".

Tennessee HB 836: Makes it legal for adoption agencies to deny LGBTQ potential parents the right to adopt children due to "sincerely held religious beliefs".

Mississippi HB 1523: Literally a direct violation of Obergefell v. Hodges, the supreme court case that legalized same sex marriage nationally, and the reason it will be struck down in court.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI:

SECTION 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Protecting Freedom of Conscience from Government Discrimination Act."

SECTION 2. The sincerely held religious beliefs or moral convictions protected by this act are the belief or conviction that:

(a) Marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman;

(b) Sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage; and

(c) Male (man) or female (woman) refer to an individual's immutable biological sex as objectively determined by anatomy and genetics at time of birth.

Weird that all these bills include the phrase "sincerely held religious beliefs". Almost like they were all written by the same people despite being in three different states. Oh right, because they were.

[Kraenen]

Because that doesn't proves anything, as those different rates could very well be the products of different choices.

Are you against free will and free choices?

It proves literally the point the person was making - that average less wealth will translate to average less opportunity.