Buzzfeed & SJWs help to ban GEN Zer Soph

[Najnaj]

If it's not the new public square then why is most public discourse now taking place on social media?

Because it has an owner and that owner is not you and your country. How hard is this to understand really?

How hard is it to get that I do not have the right to spray paint political messages on your house and that this has nothing to do with free speech?

- - - Updated - - -

You talking about the guy in the first post? Because he was antisemitic within the first minute and when people go that way, I pretty much ignore them and ridicule anyone that uses them for sources.

Yeah, that super animated dude in his 60s ... He went on for a bit about cartoon rats sodomizing each other before giving me his accumulated life wisdom.

2 thumbs up, great family fun!

[Lorgar Aurelian]

"She doesn't agree with us, must be a token"

Man, you people are sad.

who is this us? i speak only for my self. I also don't think shes a token if she was she would be genuine i think shes been fed lines.

[wunksta]

Did she have comments before that scandal?

It's been a few years since I even saw her videos, totally forgot about her until now but pretty sure comments were enabled back then.

[Pooti]

If it's not the new public square then why is most public discourse now taking place on social media?

Well for starters, it is not public.

[breslin]

looks like child abuse

[Cruor]

I love how teaching people facts has now become synonymous with brain washing.

How teaching kids to share in grade school is socialism.

The right really reaches man...

- - - Updated - - -



I don't think anyone has claimed there's more than male or female, at least nobody in a position of authority. Though which one you identify with is fair game. But let me guess you have a problem with that. God forbid amiright

Let me add, they claim you can transition from one sex to another, which you cant. Surgery a dress and makeup does not make a man into a woman, it's still a man. Right now men are ruining women's sports by being trans, usually the left would be screaming for women's rights but trans people are higher on their SJW meter, so they win.

[Monster Hunter]

a who what now?

What's a Gen Zer Soph?

The replacement for mellenials.

Gen x - > Gen y (mellenial) - > Gen z

Gen z are born 1998 onward. Where mellenials have been charicturised as mostly Liberal leaning gen z is said to be the most Conservative generation based on studys since 1945.

There now in there teens and just starting in the work force in some cases.

[gaymer77]

I just sat down and watched several of Soph's videos. This 14 year old cunt deserves the ban she got. She's a pundent of the alt-right and spews the hate speech that they are known to say. This has nothing to do with her age, the opinions she has, or the fact that she's a female. She regurgitates the alt-right's bullshit and YouTube doesn't stand for ANY person putting hate speech on their platform. And this ramzpaul asshole in the video you posted is just as bad as she is and he's an anti-Semitic cunt too. The video you posted shows his clear bias to Jews and the LGBT community. They can both GDIF as far as I'm concerned.

[Zython]

Let me add, they claim you can transition from one sex to another, which you cant. Surgery a dress and makeup does not make a man into a woman, it's still a man. Right now men are ruining women's sports by being trans, usually the left would be screaming for women's rights but trans people are higher on their SJW meter, so they win.

Where is this happening, exactly?

- - - Updated - - -

The replacement for mellenials.

Gen x - > Gen y (mellenial) - > Gen z

Gen z are born 1998 onward. Where mellenials have been charicturised as mostly Liberal leaning gen z is said to be the most Conservative generation based on studys since 1945.

There now in there teens and just starting in the work force in some cases.

The only studies I've seen saying this are basing this on whether or not they know about certain airlines that haven't existed in 20 years.

[Rysthruun]

[/B][/I]
I like how you bolded two things that the left wing stands vigorously opposed to, as if the truth were otherwise.

Before you come back with some bullshit "nuh uh", learn what "social regimentation" means, and "forcible suppression". Because respecting people's differences is not "regimentation", and banning people from Youtube etc for being shitheads is not "forcible suppression" of anything.



No, it fucking is not.

It is not public. At all.

This is a lie you folks have convinced yourselves is true. It is not true. It's utter horseshit. There is no similarity at all between social media and a public square.

Respectfully, your views about social media are wrong, very wrong. The internet itself is a public square of which social media is dependent on to function. The entire premise of social media is to be able to connect, socially, with others. Social media is no different then radio or television, both of which, are technological public squares. People are being censored and suppressed for their political views, being denied their 1st amendment rights in this public square.

By law, a public space or square is an area "which the public have access by right or by invitation, expressed or implied, whether by payment of money or not"

[Endus]

Respectfully, your views about social media are wrong, very wrong. The internet itself is a public square of which social media is dependent on to function. The entire premise of social media is to be able to connect, socially, with others. Social media is no different then radio or television, both of which, are technological public squares. People are being censored and suppressed for their political views, being denied their 1st amendment rights in this public square.

By law, a public space or square is an area "which the public have access by right or by invitation, expressed or implied, whether by payment of money or not"

Which doesn't apply to any social media site.

You've disproven your own claim, with your own definition. Social media sites are member-only.

Edit: plus, you're citing from this; https://definitions.uslegal.com/p/public-place/

Which is a definition for "public place", which isn't the same thing. Your own definition makes it clear that access to public places can be restricted for any range of reasons, for instance.

[Lorgar Aurelian]

Respectfully, your views about social media are wrong, very wrong. The internet itself is a public square of which social media is dependent on to function. The entire premise of social media is to be able to connect, socially, with others. Social media is no different then radio or television, both of which, are technological public squares. People are being censored and suppressed for their political views, being denied their 1st amendment rights in this public square.

By law, a public space or square is an area "which the public have access by right or by invitation, expressed or implied, whether by payment of money or not"

you are aware that you don't have the right to go on any radio show or television program you want right? you defeat your own argument.

[Alex86el]

I have no idea what she says.
And i'm really not interested to hear.

But the SJW crowd is a plague on the earth.

They always act in such a fascist way.
You're not allowed to say this and that. We'll hunt you down.
We dissagree with you, so we're gonna end you.

Free speech is extremelly important to have. Even when we dissagree with what is being said.
Which will be most of the times. Since we each support one opinion, when there are many more on a subject.

Words dont hurt.
People should stop being so sensitive. Or pretending to be, in order to guilt-win an argument by victimizing themselves.
The only time action should be taken is when someone is trying to agressively and systematically brainwash children, about anything.

[tangers58]

So basically they banned a kid who is reading off of a teleprompter her parent's set up?

Who gives a crap

[Appelgren]

so its just some kid being used by her parents or others to push stuff she doesn't understand.

We have the exact same thing here in sweden. Her name is Greta Thunberg.

[s_bushido]

Where is this happening, exactly?

There are a handful of trans women performing well in sports at the moment. It's going to be interesting to see how all that shakes out, and how the various sports organizations and athletes respond to it. But bigots (of the type who think there's nothing more to it than getting a surgery and putting on lipstick) love to point to them as an example of why trans people as a whole don't deserve respect.

[tangers58]

I have no idea what she says.
And i'm really not interested to hear.

But the SJW crowd is a plague on the earth.

They always act in such a fascist way.
You're not allowed to say this and that. We'll hunt you down.
We dissagree with you, so we're gonna end you.

Free speech is extremelly important to have. Even when we dissagree with what is being said.
Which will be most of the times. Since we each support one opinion, when there are many more on a subject.

Words dont hurt.
People should stop being so sensitive. Or pretending to be, in order to guilt-win an argument by victimizing themselves.
The only time action should be taken is when someone is trying to agressively and systematically brainwash children, about anything.

Pretty sure "free speech" doesn't involve freedom from other people saying things back, but good try kiddo

- - - Updated - - -

Respectfully, your views about social media are wrong, very wrong. The internet itself is a public square of which social media is dependent on to function. The entire premise of social media is to be able to connect, socially, with others. Social media is no different then radio or television, both of which, are technological public squares. People are being censored and suppressed for their political views, being denied their 1st amendment rights in this public square.

By law, a public space or square is an area "which the public have access by right or by invitation, expressed or implied, whether by payment of money or not"

You seem confused. Youtube and most other websites are not public property, they are private property. Youtube is free to ban anyone they want just as you are free to take down a sign someone posts in your yard. When the government starts forcing sites to ban people then you can rant about "free speech" and be correct, til then you are just another simpleton that doesn't understand how the world works.

[s_bushido]

We have the exact same thing here in sweden. Her name is Greta Thunberg.

I've seen her brought up a few times now, and I have to ask: Do people think that someone being an advocate for the environment (presuming that they aren't violent) deserves to be banned for their views, or is likely to be in violation of a site's terms of service? Or is it just because she's a child that people think the comparison is valid?

[Alex86el]

Pretty sure "free speech" doesn't involve freedom from other people saying things back, but good try kiddo

what are you trying to say?
of course it does. that's dialogue.
or am i missing your point? sorry not my first language.

i have no idea what the video is about. i didnt watch it.
i'm just commenting on the latest trend of "SJWing" and them "ending" people.
it's the equivalent of "i dont like your opinion, i'll gather my friends and wreck your car" type of behaviour.

[Alteiry]

The replacement for mellenials.

Gen x - > Gen y (mellenial) - > Gen z

Gen z are born 1998 onward. Where mellenials have been charicturised as mostly Liberal leaning gen z is said to be the most Conservative generation based on studys since 1945.

There now in there teens and just starting in the work force in some cases.

Lmao Gen Z isn't even remotely conservative, they're far more liberal than millenials, even among republicans. This is supported both by polling and voting records.