Originally Posted by
jakeic
What exactly was bittersweet about the ending? It was described to be bittersweet, but just because Jon kills Dany after a brief dalliance doesn’t make the ending carry extra weight. Was it because Jon has to go back to the wall, because he chose to go there of his own volition previously, which hardly makes it sad.
The ending was bad, it made no sense. For instance, the council meeting of the heads of the seven kingdoms had a few more people involved than seven. why were any of the Stark children there? The only argument could be made for Sansa as she would be the regent, but she should not have been there at all since Jon should have been allowed to attend since both Tyrion and himself were being held for treason. Additionally, if Jon were removed then Bran would become the rightful holder of Winterfell since he’s now into holding titles (it is hard to say for certain whether Bran would rule the North over Jon just outright, but Jon offered it to him and he turned it down presumably because he wants no holdings). Further problems with the North’s representation comes from Sansa, as regent she has no right or authority to seek independence, and even once an independent kingdom she wouldn’t be queen, either Jon or Bran would hold it.
Not finished with problems with the North’s representation, there’s the matter of the Iron Isles. Yara currently holds no title, the Iron Isles were part of the North, which Jon Snow fully retained, so it wasn’t possible for Daenerys to grant Yara a kingdom, as she would have to first revoke it from the North, which never happened (coincidentally this could have been the point of contention between Sansa and Daenerys in the show, but it was never discussed). So Yara should not have been there, and even if you were to argue that Daenerys did revoke the title then granted it to Yara, it would be dubious how well that claim would have held up after the sacking of Kings Landing.
Which brings us to Gendry, who after rowing for seasons on end and then running a marathon and then outfitting the greatest fighting force in the world with dragon glass, was given the Storm Lands. This in itself isn’t under contention, however it seems incredibly unlikely that there were no other claimants to that title and that he traveled south with papers stamped with Daenerys Targaryen on it and brought everything in order. Let’s just say that did happen, why would any of the other kingdoms recognize his claim after the events of Kings Landing?
And yet, those people aren’t the only out of place people in the meeting. Samwell Tarley, a maester and a man with no titles as he is still sworn to the Nights Watch shouldn’t be there, even forgetting Sam's double swear off of titles, Tarly is a vassal to the Reach and is not a representative of the seven kingdoms. Davos Seaworth's holding is part of the Storm Lands, he is a minor house and has no business being there. Brienne of Tarth has no holdings, carries no titles, and serves no purpose at the meeting. Yohn Royce is also a vassal lord to the ruler of the Vale and has no right to be at the meeting.
The entire council scene just reeked of incompetence from the writers, or at best an excuse to put all the "important" characters together at the end. I’m sure there are people who don’t care, who think any criticism levied toward the meeting is nitpicking, or are willing to simply hand wave succession laws as inconsequential (despite the entire show being about it), but I think this scene just highlights the complaints of how the show has completely abandoned following established rules and the characters suffering or prospering based on how they navigated those rules in favor of tropes and set pieces that it sought to overturn.