Trump supporters demand to know if Navajo legislator is an illegal immigrant

[Lionhearte0]

The first thing you see under the title is" If accepted as Homo sapien, the jaw-dropping jawbone would push back the human exodus out of Africa by nearly 100,000 years" They literally said we likely migrated even further back into the past, not that we never did. You need to learn how to reread your sources.

Here's a few other takes. I don't understand why it's so hard to Google it yourself. It's also hotly contended with Chinese models and/or Multiregionalism. But it's expensive rewriting text books every 3 days so people stick with dominant theories out of convenience. Paper is slowing Human progress. And Illegals.

https://www.natureasia.com/en/nmiddl...leeast.2018.15

https://blog.insito.me/is-the-out-of...d-22bacdd934a7

- - - Updated - - -

Found the fascist.

National Socialist* actually. Italians were the Fascists. Whom Churchill admired greatly.

[Cizr]

In a live stream of the protest uploaded to Facebook by Antone, a LUCHA member could be heard telling a black Trump supporter, “You’re gonna be the first to get lynched.”

I think we've reached peak stupid.

I agree. Peak stupid. Left really hates their "Uncle Toms" or whatever they call blacks who dont share their views

[JohnBrown1917]

National Socialist* actually. Italians were the Fascists. Whom Churchill admired greatly.

I mean, you're honest at least.

[Lionhearte0]

That article literally takes out of Africa as fact and your'e arguing against it... with an article that isn't doing what you're saying it is....

Literally all it says is "we're not sure if this is modern human it may be from an extinct human species, if modern human though it would mean out of Africa happened earlier than we originally thought"

None of this = Out of Africa is a myth.

The point was that it's contending, take the Dali Skull for instance. In fact there is enough to disprove the OoAT but until a formalized theory and pattern can be established we stick with it because reasons.

- - - Updated - - -

I mean, you're honest at least.

Or I'm not. Maybe I just enjoy derailing and fucking around. This thread was non-straight from the beginning.

[JohnBrown1917]

I agree. Peak stupid. Left really hates their "Uncle Toms" or whatever they call blacks who dont share their views

Thats an insult usually used by other black people, but hey, I know our fascist posters hate facts. So no worries, I understand.

- - - Updated - - -

The point was that it's contending, take the Dali Skull for instance. In fact there is enough to disprove the OoAT but until a formalized theory and pattern can be established we stick with it because reasons.

- - - Updated - - -



Or I'm not. Maybe I just enjoy derailing and fucking around. This thread was non-straight from the beginning.

Too late to back out now, sorry bud.

[Cizr]

Thats an insult usually used by other black people, but hey, I know our fascist posters hate facts. So no worries, I understand.

- - - Updated - - -



Too late to back out now, sorry bud.

what fact? are you claiming that only black people say that? Because other option makes me right,so pick one?

Seeing how you hate free speech and use alt right symbol as your avatar I guess you are talking about yourself?

https://www.newsweek.com/gritty-alt-...flyers-1222767

[Rozz]

Here's a few other takes. I don't understand why it's so hard to Google it yourself. It's also hotly contended with Chinese models and/or Multiregionalism. But it's expensive rewriting text books every 3 days so people stick with dominant theories out of convenience. Paper is slowing Human progress. And Illegals.

https://www.natureasia.com/en/nmiddl...leeast.2018.15

https://blog.insito.me/is-the-out-of...d-22bacdd934a7

- - - Updated - - -



National Socialist* actually. Italians were the Fascists. Whom Churchill admired greatly.

Your first source:
"This find is among a host of other discoveries pushing back the date of human evolution, for example the 300,000 year-old earliest modern human fossil from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco2 3, and showing an earlier and more varied pattern of human migration out of Africa, such as a recent study supporting the presence of modern humans in Asia 120,000 years ago.4

Douka says this find “confirms the current thought in the community that there was not a single wave out of Africa, but frequent expansions which often failed.” "

Your second source:
"Wolpoff coined the term ‘multiregional evolution’ and developed a hypothesis that suggests ancient humans existed in multiple parts of the globe, as they do today, and evolved and adapted separately to their respective environments.
Whether or not Neanderthals should be considered Homo sapiens is highly contested, but by the traditional definition of speciation, humans and Neanderthals are the same species."
If Neanderthals are “human,” then this does not fall in line with the ‘Out of Africa’ theory. "
Is all about if people consider Neanderthals humans, then the model that humans all dispersed from one place may not be accurate. But it does not deny diaspora and supposes a different form of evolution if people can agree that there were multiple types of humans across the world. That's what's contested, because it takes a lot of evolutionary and genetic testing to determine as such.

Neither deny African diaspora, only supposing it happened 1. Further back 2. Multiple Times 3. May not be the only form, so a new model is needed as sequencing is done on our ancestors. Your problem is that you clearly googled it and never bothered to read. And in the scientific world, people 'rewrite' text books and make papers all the damn time to challenge dominant theories. They get traction due to the weight of their content and relevance. The last article didn't say anything other than 'maybe we should change the model if x is true' without even showing the ground work to determine if it is or not. A real scientific source will be peer reviewed, show their data, get published in a journal, and would be longer than page scroll. Also the last place I'd trust as a legitimate source is anything from China, since they have been accused of falsifying data before to propagate their own narrative.

The best source you gave on the topic is the last one that refers to actual sources mentioned by Milford that did the work and data to suggest evidence to look into changing the model, but the article ultimately ends in saying: "Anthropologists have these two plausible theories for the origins of humanity — each one having substantial evidence to both support and deny its validity" since the definition of the modern human and its ancestor has to be agreed upon first. There is still not solid rejection of the African Diaspora Theory, because the opposition needs to build solid footing first. In reality it seems the 'opposition' isn't even rejecting diaspora as an idea, just when it happened or if it was only in one place. They want to change the model, not the concept. Read your damn sources, because I sure as hell did more than you.

Edit: Wall of text is nasty.

[Mormolyce]

I agree. Peak stupid. Left really hates their "Uncle Toms" or whatever they call blacks who dont share their views

Boy you're sounding more and more deranged lol.

And once again, talking about anything other than the thread title. I'll take that as a concession of defeat.

- - - Updated - - -

"Out of Africa" is an old myth. Go back to school.

By the way, Might Makes Right. Colonizers beat the fuck out of the Native Siberians. They should be grateful we let them stay.

No it's still current.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recent..._modern_humans

If might makes right, can I beat you up and take your wallet? Lel.

[Independent voter]

For “the fun of it,” Chávez said, he replied, “I’m an undocumented legislator.”


See, that's not helpful.

[Gaexion Ramza Beoulve]

Do you have proof? Do you have video? Pictures?

Is this going to be another Covington incident where the media and the left get their asses handed to them?

Can your liberal heart withstand another soul crushing defeat?

[PACOX]

what fact? are you claiming that only black people say that? Because other option makes me right,so pick one?

Seeing how you hate free speech and use alt right symbol as your avatar I guess you are talking about yourself?

https://www.newsweek.com/gritty-alt-...flyers-1222767

Says the guy with type of swastika as his avatar.

But its an ancient Slavic symbol!

As if nazi hakenkreuz wasn't an ancient symbol.

[Frolk]

This is what u get when u neglect education and focus on other things instead.

[Flarelaine]

Do you have proof? Do you have video? Pictures?

Is this going to be another Covington incident where the media and the left get their asses handed to them?

Oh, you have news on that? Can you link the verdict? I remember the smirking guy sued everyone around for obscene amounts of money. You now say the media got their asses handed to them so there is a verdict, right?

[Lorgar Aurelian]

Do you have proof? Do you have video? Pictures?

Is this going to be another Covington incident where the media and the left get their asses handed to them?

Can your liberal heart withstand another soul crushing defeat?

There are abunch of videos in the ops link it seems. Here’s one.

[Easo]

So, Mr. Lionhearte0, you are basically saying that Indians were immigrants too and that this Navarro is a migrant too? WTF?
Yeah, this has to be a bait attempt.