GOP Representative Lays Out Case For Impeachment

[Dontrike]

Truer words have never been spoken. This thread is a cess pool of unhinged NPC derangement.

Using NPC seriously is literally one of the most NPC things you can do.

[Orbitus]

Please proceed with impeachment. We can then be ensured a Trump 2020 landslide and all the FISA documents can be exposed in the process.

You mean the FISA documents that Nunes released a memo about that made him look like a retard? Or you talking about the FISA documents that Republican judges approved that take a ridiculous amount of evidence to get? You are trying so fucking hard, and yet failing. Not surprising with you though. And the entirety of the Democrat and independent voters would have to die for Trump to get elected in a landslide.

- - - Updated - - -

Truer words have never been spoken. This thread is a cess pool of unhinged NPC derangement.

Yeah we know, Trump supporters have no common sense.

- - - Updated - - -

Either way I am tired of people crying wolf only to find no wolf. Either make a real move against him or let it go.

You aren't finding a wolf, because you aren't fucking looking. And you say you aren't a fucking Trump supporter.

[Dontrike]

Either way I am tired of people crying wolf only to find no wolf. Either make a real move against him or let it go.

How about when someone cries wolf and there are more than 10 wolves from one pack and other wolves from another pack?

[Has lost its way]

How about when someone cries wolf and there are more than 10 wolves from one pack and other wolves from another pack?

I am still waiting on that and it has been 3 years... at some point im going to assume innocence over guilt.

[Orbitus]

Spoken like a true NPC, but replying with the same insult seems to indicate you need debugging. Surely your brainwashing masters know that strategy is too transparent.

Do you have anything relevant to add to the fucking conversation?

- - - Updated - - -

I am still waiting on that and it has been 3 years... at some point im going to assume innocence over guilt.

So, you have your head shoved in the sand? And you say you aren't a Trump supporter.

[Kronik85]

Show me the forum rule where my post must "add to the conversation"? Otherwise I direct you to my grandmothers old adage: "You mad bro"? As an unrelated side note: can you kindly inform me as to what his post of:
"Do you have anything to say, or have your programmers updated your script yet?" "added the the conversation?" oh wait... whats that? You're a partisan hack is all? Who woulda thunk it.

Spamming and trolling is against the forum rules. If you aren't contributing to the thread then it's likely you are doing one thing or the other. So you choose how you want to have your post reported.

[Noxx79]

Show me the forum rule where my post must "add to the conversation"? Otherwise I direct you to my grandmothers old adage: "You mad bro"? As an unrelated side note: can you kindly inform me as to what his post of:
"Do you have anything to say, or have your programmers updated your script yet?" "added the the conversation?" oh wait... whats that? You're a partisan hack is all? Who woulda thunk it.

I love it when you guys project. Now are you going to contribute, or keep on being like a robot who can’t defend his views?

[Orbitus]

So report me. Where is the ban?

- - - Updated - - -



Give me a view to defend. Ill spank you in the debate. NPCs like you require way to much time to report back to your masters for how to respond. People who think for them selves can reply on the fly.

Looks like you are losing to me. But then again, you started losing before you even started typing.

[Noxx79]

So report me. Where is the ban?

- - - Updated - - -



Give me a view to defend. Ill spank you in the debate. NPCs like you require way to much time to report back to your masters for how to respond. People who think for them selves can reply on the fly.

You don’t think for yourself. You’re projecting, and it’s hilarious.

Enjoy your ban, robot.

[Noxx79]

How so? I sure feel like a winner. Im smiling right now. A man who lost has dropped his sword. A coward who remained online but didnt respond untill backup arrived is a loser in my eyes. One who can be easily ignored on the cultural battlefield.

Your cardboard tube is not a sword, but you’ve been told it was. Keep believing it though. Everyone laughs at the larper.

- - - Updated - - -

Ban me NPC. Or give me a view to defend you coward.

So you admit you have nothing. Just name calling.

[Xeones]

Either way I am tired of people crying wolf only to find no wolf. Either make a real move against him or let it go.

o.0

Like do this many people really watch Fox News and legitimately believe there is nothing in the report even though it spells out a clear case for obstruction and lays out the argument for collusion that doesn't rise to the crime of conspiracy which is why it is currently being investigated more in depth by congress with leads that Muller didn't take on?

No dude, the wolf is there you're just choosing to remain unaware of it by believing the people who tell you it isn't there when it's right in front of your eyes.

[Noxx79]

Give me a view to defend. Or walk away coward.

More name calling.

This thread is about a Republican who has laid out a case for impeachment. Support or deny it.

[Orbitus]

How so? I sure feel like a winner. Im smiling right now. A man who lost has dropped his sword. A coward who remained online but didnt respond untill backup arrived is a loser in my eyes. One who can be easily ignored on the cultural battlefield.

How are you winning anything? Is this like Trump's version of winning? Because he hasn't been doing ANY of that at all during his presidency. Even when he had control of all 3 branches of government.

[Kronik85]

So report me. Where is the ban?

Well you tell me which one you want reporting on and I'll hit that button. An infraction seems more likely than a ban unless you've been accumulating mod points though.

/Edit: Guess they had a nice tally going already lol.

[Machismo]

So report me. Where is the ban?

- - - Updated - - -



Give me a view to defend. Ill spank you in the debate. NPCs like you require way to much time to report back to your masters for how to respond. People who think for them selves can reply on the fly.

It's odd that you say that, considering you spent months refusing to back up claims you made.

[Themius]

It is not a symptom. It is a result of an overly religious base banding together to stand against an overly progressive base. They band together to fight each other because they are both so afraid of giving any ground.

So you end up with 2 major parties, funded by corporations, fighting for the beliefs of the most radical while still enticing most moderates because they have no other choice.

Truly the 2 party system and the split goes back to slavery. At one point you did have the whigs who were quite literally a very diverse set of people Calhoun was one of the founders of that party for goodness sakes.

we can see 2 party systems entirely around slavery, the whole entire idea of nullification (the idea that a state can decide that a law doesn't apply to them) was in part cooked up by slave owning states (before the civil war) to set the precedence. If I recall correctly this revolved around banks, but the argument was there for slavery in the event.

Since the founding of this country the majority has kowtowed to the minority, the founders gave the 3/5th compromise which made slave owning states have more voting power than they deserved, the Missouri compromise, and just other compromises over time and it always came down to 2 parties the slave owning party and the abolitionist.

[Dontrike]

I am still waiting on that and it has been 3 years... at some point im going to assume innocence over guilt.

Perhaps if you read the report, but something tells me that even "doesn't exonerate" didn't quite get through. Hell, when Mueller himself said "If he committed no crimes we would have said so" seems to be too much.

So do tell, if he didn't not commit crimes then that would mean the opposite is true.

- - - Updated - - -

Then show me your sword. If mine is cardboard you will surly cut through. Otherwise I remain on the battlefield. I see your shaking knees.

What the hell am I reading?

[Mormolyce]

Ah I understand you now. Then how did Trump set a record with two while Hillary had five?

adding your quote

Yeah nice try, but no.

The bulk of the votes came from Washington state, where three Democratic electors bucked Hillary Clinton and cast votes for Colin Powell, a retired general, an African-American — and a Republican. These Democrats were supporting a failed effort meant to block the election of Donald Trump and unite behind an alternative Republican candidate. Powell turned out to be their choice.

A fourth Washington state elector — Robert Satiacum — cast his ballot for Native American activist Faith Spotted Eagle. And a fifth vote against Clinton came late Monday in Hawaii, where one elector voted for Bernie Sanders.

The only two anti-Trump votes occurred in Texas. One, cast by elector Chris Suprun for Ohio Gov. John Kasich, was expected. But a second, cast by an unknown elector for libertarian former Rep. Ron Paul, was a surprise.

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/...lectors-232836

The five faithless electors you mention were participating in an anti-Trump protest, so counting them as "Hillary's faithless electors" is being intentionally misleading. I don't believe for a minute you don't know that, so that's just blatant dishonesty intended to gaslight.

Do you ever wonder what it'd be like to have a worldview that didn't require you to lie on its behalf?

[Citizen T]

Yeah nice try, but no.


https://www.politico.com/story/2016/...lectors-232836

The five faithless electors you mention were participating in an anti-Trump protest, so counting them as "Hillary's faithless electors" is being intentionally misleading. I don't believe for a minute you don't know that, so that's just blatant dishonesty intended to gaslight.

Do you ever wonder what it'd be like to have a worldview that didn't require you to lie on its behalf?

You can try to spin it any way you want, but the electors were faithless to Hillary, not Trump. They were pledged to Hillary and voted for someone else. Assuming what Politico says is true, then those electors were not only faithless but pretty stupid to think their "protest" was going to make any difference.

[downnola]

You can try to spin it any way you want, but the electors were faithless to Hillary, not Trump. They were pledged to Hillary and voted for someone else. Assuming what Politico says is true, then those electors were not only faithless but pretty stupid to think their "protest" was going to make any difference.

From the article:

The bulk of the votes came from Washington state, where three Democratic electors bucked Hillary Clinton and cast votes for Colin Powell, a retired general, an African-American — and a Republican. These Democrats were supporting a failed effort meant to block the election of Donald Trump and unite behind an alternative Republican candidate. Powell turned out to be their choice.

The only spin is coming from you. Their intentions were clear and you're arguing over a technicality.

*edit Just noticed I'm just repeating what Mormo already quoted. Oh well, it's worth repeating.