"I'm not stuck in the trench, I'm maintaining my rating."
What I meant is you're discussing euthanasia as a whole, which surprisingly enough i do think has a place in society. However, as a poster said earlier on, this is a setback especially for those who think euthanasia should be legalised. You want to allow teenagers to make decisions over life and death in a society ran by social media? It would open the gates of hell.
Nope, it's a complex issue and needs to go theough proper channels and plenty of examinations before a decision on a case can be made. You also need to go through treatments to see if anything helps.. If nothing do you can start talking about it.
Why do you think anyone here evne argues for that you can just say "kill me" and that's that? At this point I seem to think yiu just refuse to even think about the arguments except "you don't agree with me thus your position is this"..it starts to become boring when I have to repeat my points because of your ridiculous reductions.
It's not a personal attack. I'm using you as an example that even 38 is too inept of an age, apparently, to choose their own time to die. That hurts my initial argument as your brain should've been done developing 15 years ago, but you are proof that some people need more time.
"I'm not stuck in the trench, I'm maintaining my rating."
Have you known her? The professionals that approved of her decision (they could have labelled her mentally ill to stop it) did. So I rather tend to agree to them over someone who makes up hypothetical issues up out of nowhere without any knowledge of the case except some news article.
I was fairly certain that the entire point of the safeguards were that people with depression and other mental based problems weren't able to get assisted suicide tbh.
Then again if doctors are willing to allow children to undertake hormone therapy then this doesn't surprise me either
doctors help patients end their life everywhere, regardless of legality. often at great risk to their careers and freedoms. most people are very understanding when its an old person suffering from very painful cancer.
but as is so often the case with mental problems, people can't relate to it and so dismiss it.
we trust doctors to make life and death decisions every day, how is this particular decision so much different?
i've always had a feeling that i hated the netherlands...couldn't ever figure why.
but now i know. seriously, that's some fucked up shit. europe loves to chime in on our gun situation in America, but you guys just let people go to a doctor and get put down like a dog. tragic.
legal euthanasia should be reserved for patients that are in constant physical pain, not 17 year old rape victims. as sad as rape is, she was still a child and in no way was she capable of comprehending the magnitude of what she was doing.
17. everything about her life could have changed over the next few years. move to a different town or country. go to new places. start a new life. leave all the sadness back in your old life. guess we'll never know.
Last edited by Vargulf the Happy Husky; 2019-06-05 at 11:14 AM.
No sense crying over spilt beer, unless you're drunk...
Indeed if we accept this papers will be signed as soon as someone gets bullied through social media.
You seem to ignore the fact that to even get to that point where it's on the table you need to go trough examinations and treatments to prevent it being an option to begin with.
Once again, this is not about anyone should be able to say "kill me" and then we kill them..Christ.