Last edited by Darth-Piekus; 2019-06-13 at 11:08 AM.
Move it to his death then. Because whether Garrosh swore the Blood Oath to AU Grom or not isn't really relevant. That wouldn't make Grom the Warchief of the MU Horde under any rule of the Horde we know of. It'd simply make Garrosh a member of two Hordes at once and through him it'd make the MU Horde subservient to AU Grom's own Iron Horde. And once Garrosh died, the chain of command of the MU Horde still ultimately went kaput. Now, it could be argued that under those circumstances the Iron Horde would have better claim to Garrosh's Horde than Vol'jin's, but since Blizzard didn't explore this one iota, we don't have solid information in either direction.
You are right that Garrosh is simultaneously the Warchief of the Horde and a Warlord in the Iron Horde who's made the Blood Oath to Grom. All members of the Horde are instruments of Garrosh's will. Garrosh is an instrument of Grom's will, therefore by extension the ones bound to Garrosh are bound to Grom. You can go one of two routes with this - the first is that when Garrosh dies the MU Horde ceases to be. The other reading is that they are fully subsumed into the Iron Horde. With the latter rendition, Grom passes to Geyarah and Geyarah swears to Sylvanas, legitimizing her.
If not, then the Horde dies with Garrosh and the Playable Horde remains illegitimate.
Dickmann's Law: As a discussion on the Lore forums becomes longer, the probability of the topic derailing to become about Sylvanas approaches 1.
Tinkers will be the next Class confirmed.
The WoD draenei genocide plot, and the Teldrassil burning plot are eerily similar at times, both seem to be written solely for shock value, with no thought given to how important this should be for everyone involved.
Draenei after WoD essentially have moral carte blanche to dictate terms with the Orcs, and yet the narrative seems to gloss over it seemingly just because it does not want to deal with the problem it has created.
Burning of Teldrassil is the same, this should be brought up at almost every turn as the ultimate moral failing of the Horde, and on both sides of the faction divide, yet noone seems to give it much though, 8.1 with the Darkshore warfront is the most it got, and even that seems to have been written with little concern for Teldrassil at all.
My dream scenario is Sylvanas Gathering all the rebel leaders in one place and blow them up. If you sided with her throughout the questline you a get a “good job” + reward. If you sided with the rebel, she shows up and pull you out of the explosion range just in time and tells you she only spared you because she knows you’re important to Azeroth and she will be watching you. Bonus points if she finds a way to mind control some alliance npc (maybe a night elf) to force them so set off the explosion so it could all be blamed on the alliance thus we never have another neutral city expansion ever again.
- - - Updated - - -
While I’m a sylvanas fanboy, I have no delusions that she isn’t evil. You do realize if the puppy didn’t stop her she was going to enslave a race of people that was fighting against the legion right? And since she always had her sight on Stormwind, even if she didn’t need to sacrifice humans to empower the forsaken, once she created an entire empowered deathknight level forsaken army, it’s pretty much guaranteed she would head to Stormwind to make more forsaken to also empower and bolster her forces. Anduin should be kissing the dogs feet in thanks for saving the alliance.
Originally Posted by Ruargh
Sylvanas is not a character
it's a plot device
A bad one at that
This world don't give us nothing. It be our lot to suffer... and our duty to fight back.
They were fighting literally ANYTHING.... Legion, us, themselves... big on fighting amongst themselves. And add in their highest tech was a variation of metal working for better blades and taming local drakes. Not counting their literal god stepping down to stand at his front porch to one shot nearby interstellar dreadnaughts.
I mean the Murlocs also were fighting the legion, if that amounts to anything.
Her just remaining warchief would still make her the rightful warchief. There is no real like "rightful" warchief, you just follow whoever is in charge at the time without question. Other than a rebellion I don't see how she would not be the "rightful" warchief.
They already said Tyrande got her revenge, so the genocide is already hand-waved away. I would guess the only time we would return to that plot point would be if they were making Tyrande a raid boss.