You clearly don't understand what Furry means then.
It's about anthropomorphic races, not specifically them having fur, nor are anthropomorphic animals Furries unless they literally partake in the fandom.
Plenty of Furries fantasize and play around with personas that are reptiles, birds, dragons, dinosaurs, even koi fish.
Broken Arakkoa would also qualify as a race for Furries, so...
But Furries are such a small part of mankind that it's hardly an issue. Vulpera appeal to me, and I wouldn't touch the furry fandom with a 10 foot pole.
Fuck Mechagnomes. The Alliance can have them, they're abominations, worse than regular Gnomes.
Are you OK? I'd lean towards no, considering you think there's anything pedo about fully grown creatures in a fantasy setting just because they're small in stature... LOTR is pedo shit then?
And Sethrak qualify 100% to the Furry fandom, they're anthropomorphic animals. You and others being ignorant doesn't change that fact. At least do what I did and learn about it before hating. I hate, but from a point of actual knowledge.
- - - Updated - - -
They would be, the Horde have far more to do with them.
I don't know what you see in Vulperas. I respect it, but i really don't like them. lol
And the Horde still does far more for the Devoted than Alliance does, so...
I play both factions, so I don't have to sit on the teeter-totter of perpetual whining about faction favoritism unlike you.
Have to say though that Void Elves and Kul Tiran Humans clearly got far more development love than any Horde races in terms of customization options and of course, new model in the case of Kul Tiran. The Vulpera will balance it if anything. Playable Nightborne might've sparked a lot of whinge, but they're an underwhelming realization of the Nightborne we saw during Legion.
- - - Updated - - -
Different strokes and all that. Good thing that we can choose our races and ignore those we don't want to play, whilst having many options all the same.
Last edited by Queen of Hamsters; 2019-06-13 at 05:06 PM.
There's nothing interesting about Vulperas other than that they're little furry foxes, even their questlines completely get face slapped by Sethrak questlines and their vibe overall in that area.
Hell, even turtles are far more interesting than vulperas.. Ask most people what's the appeal of vulperas, they'll answer ''Yey, cute little foxes''.
Blizzard should focus on adding OG races but there's probably not that much money in it like for this furry race, so i guess thats the reason.
After what happened when people datamined the new Vulpera models in BfA beta, I'm pretty sure Blizzard learned to hide their in-development stuff better. I wouldn't be surprised if they have an almost fully-developed playable Sethrak sitting in a locked folder somewhere. And I wouldn't say there's no sign: they've got the Heart of Azeroth animation and there's the fact that they've had their tabard models adjusted to work better despite no Sethrak NPCs wearing tabards.
And as far as the story goes, I think void elves prove that anything can be whipped up in an afternoon if they really want something to happen. I agree that mechagnomes are more likely, unfortunately, but considering the enormous backlash already happening against that before they're even announced, I hold out a small spark of hope that Blizzard will use common sense for once.
Have you considered seeking help? Every post you make on these forums is some next level cringe.
Xal'atath whispers: Your allies consider me a bad influence. Yet all I've ever done is speed you along the path you chose.
hahahahhahahaha point of actual knowledge about pedo spawns for degenerates
Hobbits are not cute, they are weird looking smaller ma with oddly placed hair and warped body features. But yes if someone draws a cute hobbit I think it's some loli pedo shit.
If anything then Sethrak would be scalies not furries, muh educatiun, also they don't aim at child like depiction.
You be right homie, I meant gnome instead of goblin. Cringe all you want, free of charge.