“Life is and will ever remain an equation incapable of solution, but it contains certain known factors.”
Well, I do not pass judgement when it comes to a person's wealth ( or a lot of other things ), unless they are some criminal king pin. Then I will say, they are crooks and should be arrested and sent to prison.
This is true. The rich generally got their wealth from hiring people to do their required work/services. But so what? The people are hired to do a service, they are being compensated.
If a billionaire wants to retire to a island and close out his company, live a life of isolation, that is their choice. Most do not however and depend on a lot of other people to maintain their wealth status.
- - - Updated - - -
Of course. But this is nothing new. We can have certain laws to help reduce that. But you will never get rid of it.
It would be the commendable thing to do for sure. And those who do it after obtaining thier wealth, should be noted and commended. But it is not my choice for them to do so. It is theirs.
" If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher.." - Abraham Lincoln
“ The Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to - prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms..” - Samuel Adams
Bezos wife left him and took half his money.
Is he still worth more than $100 million?
Bill Gates says he's giving away all of his money, leaving just a paltry $100 million to each kid.
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland
" If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher.." - Abraham Lincoln
“ The Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to - prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms..” - Samuel Adams
No she didn't. She will get her stock options from the company "Amazon" which is what she's had for years which is close to 40 billion which is hers alone no strings attached. Also, probably alimony so maybe a few more billion. All in all she's stated already and signed the pledge to the Gates foundation to give 90% of her fortune to.
I'd say she'll probably get 40-42 billion before taxes that is if she cashes out her stock which I wouldn't for awhile.
I'm not living the US but are you actually saying a company like blizzard should legally be allowed to earn billions and pay no taxes? i believe someone made a thread where they actually got a tax rebate.
I mean the small guy should pay taxes but billion dollar companies should legally pay none because they run from an empty basement? what a joke.
You hear this a lot. A corporation is taxed 3 times.
Say you're a plumber and you've done really well for yourself. You have 2 dozen employees and 8 trucks. You start thinking about incorporating because you're worried about getting sued. So you incorporate. Now if someone sues, it's not on you, it's on the corporation.
But if your corporation's stocks make money and you make money, you have to pay tax.
You now have to pay income tax just like all employees. You're employed by your corporation.
The corporation itself has pay income tax.
So a corporation is taxed a lot more. So even if you hear Blizzard paid zero income tax, all the employees at Blizzard paid tax and if Blizzard stock went up and a shareholder sold it, he'd have to pay tax on any profit.
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland
Damn, that's gotta be the world's most successful gold-digger.
Also, a "paltry" hundred million, huh? So, enough to live off of for the rest of their lives in comfort and luxury, for them and possibly future generations, assuming they invest it?
- - - Updated - - -
And Acti-Blizz paying nothing in taxes and getting government kickbacks instead, how about that? Not sure how you can justify these incredibly profitable corporations actually GETTING MONEY from tax-payers when they can absolutely afford to pay their fair share.
If the money didn't come from society I'd agree, but that wealth is gained at the cost of regular people. Tax avoidance, getting laws in place that allows them to pay less to workers, preventing laws to ensure their products are safe/humane, using monopolies to crush competition making consumers lose out while lobbying to make sure they're allowed to do so, using loopholes to drastically reduce job security or working conditions, exploiting poorer countries. The list goes on and on, it's a massive exploitation of society without paying a fair share back.
Hell, seemingly innocent corporations like fruit suppliers have used mercenaries to execute people in poorer countries, just to prevent unionizing. Oil companies use mercenaries to murder civilians to ensure continued exploitation of poor countries.
I know you said "as long as it is legal", but the problem is that
1) They use their power to make things legal that shouldn't be (if the public was your priority).
2) even despite 1, they break laws on massive scales everywhere that can't afford to go after them for it.
No one has 100 billion gained through legal and moral means.
At some point how you spend money is not just a private decision because it impacts the socio-economic livelihoods of hundreds of millions of people.
Wealth allows one to exert influence over other people, by any reasonable definition, freedom cannot exist where one person is able to exert unmitigated and unchecked influence over millions of others.
" If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher.." - Abraham Lincoln
“ The Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to - prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms..” - Samuel Adams
At what cost? If the laws are not made to protect the workers, such as min wages set and the number of hours worked, etc, then yes, they can be made at the cost of the workers. Which is why the laws to protect workers is important.
Tax avoidance? Then that is the fault of the law makers. Who in a democratic society, are voted in by the people. Kind of reeks of lack of real concern, if the voter turnout is very low. And if the majority are content with their law makers, then there is not much a individual can do, but vote when they can. The fault is not the rich person.
Are you saying those who earned the 100 billion , all of them earned it illegally or in immoral ways? Going to have to prove that to convince me. And what are good morals will vary among people, depending on their own convictions.
- - - Updated - - -
Which is why the laws we make are important. Freedoms have to exist also for the rich.
Last edited by Ghostpanther; 2019-06-20 at 04:19 PM.
" If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher.." - Abraham Lincoln
“ The Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to - prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms..” - Samuel Adams
Take a look at the corporate tax rates, estate taxes, etc. they're EXTREMELY LOW or ZERO.
- - - Updated - - -
Take a look at the corporate tax rates, estate taxes, etc. they're EXTREMELY LOW or ZERO.
If I had 100 billion I would be making concerted efforts to donate and manage many many small programs around the country and globe for poorer communities. I would definitely be spending a lot of it on the welfare of the world.
Corporate tax rates, estate taxes, etc, are separate from individual income tax rates. But then again, those are set by the law makers. Blame them, not the rich guy. If a reduction, loop hole or such exists for them to pay less taxes, not their fault if they use them to pay less taxes. I would. Hell I bet most on here would if they were faced with that choice. Who wants to pay more taxes than they have to when faced with the option not to?
If I had 100 billion I would be making concerted efforts to donate and manage many many small programs around the country and globe for poorer communities. I would definitely be spending a lot of it on the welfare of the world. - Galactis
And that would be your choice and a commendable one at that.
Last edited by Ghostpanther; 2019-06-20 at 04:31 PM.
" If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher.." - Abraham Lincoln
“ The Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to - prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms..” - Samuel Adams
Indeed friend, indeed. People with billions and billions and billions of dollars. It's like getting to a point having so much money one can essentially not wastefully spend it all. Like, that person just gets things and doesn't even think of money. It just happens. Get a car ok... Get a sandwich ok....Just get things and they just appear...