That's my issue, here.
The complaint seems to be "this in-game ad is soulless, cheap exploitation of the transgendered! To sell soda!"
And my response is "that's dystopian megacorps for you. Are you new to the concept of cyberpunk?"
I just think people have lost sight of how to read these kinds of settings. I think the Handmaid's Tale TV show is emblematic; the book ends in confusion and uncertainty. The TV show's gone well beyond that, and is now (apparently) chronicling the collapse of Gilead and the rebellion's resurgence. That cheapens the story. The uncertain, uncomfortable ending is the point, not that everything ties off with a neat bow.
The ending of Game of Thrones, same kind of thing. It was way too pat, doesn't fit with the rest of the show. Good guys "won", bad guys died, everyone named Stark wins. The entire show was dystopic; the challenge was to find any characters that were decent human beings. Worse, the show got a lot of people to root for a tyrant, which is why they were so goddamned upset about that revelation, even though it was set in Daenerys' character, in her own words, all the way back in Season 2. They needed a tragic, dystopic ending, but they knew the audience would pitch an even bigger fit, so we got what we got.
That you're angry about these things is deliberate. That's the author's goal. If you're angry at the author, you're not paying attention and are borderline illiterate; you do not comprehend how narrative storytelling works.