Seems to ne an USA only thing. In Gernany Dachau is well known; being the first concentration camp of Nazi Germany, and Bergen-Belsen, due to Anne Frank, and being the heart of the KZ system in Germany, handling forced laborers, jews for Auschwitz, and paricipating of killing inmates.
The following tenets seem fairly decent as a starting point:
Robert O. Paxton finds that the transformations undertaken by fascists in power were "profound enough to be called 'revolutionary.'" They "often set fascists into conflict with conservatives rooted in families, churches, social rank, and property."Interesting to note this mentality is something we get from the far-left quite a bit as well as the far-right. In other words, there is no private life, it's all political, and you need to actively protest and affirm our ideology or you are not even worthy of our contempt.[F]ascism redrew the frontiers between private and public, sharply diminishing what had once been untouchably private. It changed the practice of citizenship from the enjoyment of constitutional rights and duties to participation in mass ceremonies of affirmation and conformity. It reconfigured relations between the individual and the collectivity, so that an individual had no rights outside community interest. It expanded the powers of the executive—party and state—in a bid for total control. Finally, it unleashed aggressive emotions hitherto known in Europe only during war or social revolution.
Ultranationalism combined with the myth of national rebirth is a key foundation of fascism.Fascism promotes the establishment of a totalitarian state. It opposes liberal democracy, rejects multi-party systems and supports a one-party state.Fascism presented itself as a third position, alternative to both international socialism and free market capitalism. While fascism opposed mainstream socialism, it sometimes regarded itself as a type of nationalist "socialism" to highlight their commitment to national solidarity and unity. Fascists opposed international free market capitalism, but supported a type of productive capitalism. Economic self-sufficiency, known as autarky, was a major goal of most fascist governments.It's clear from this that Fascism is not simply conservatism, or nationalism, or patriotism, or immigration-skepticism (it's also not liberalism or progressivism, for what it's worth).Fascism emphasizes direct action, including supporting the legitimacy of political violence, as a core part of its politics. Fascism views violent action as a necessity in politics that fascism identifies as being an "endless struggle"
Same as it always has, really. It isn't hard connecting lines to most of the things that fascism was notorious for.
That it is often times way too generalizing, is what others have mentioned plenty of times already. Just as we do with communists.
Formerly Howeller, lost my account.
The term "how to spot the fascist" springs to mind, indeed.
As for on-topic: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fascism
From what I have understood, anyone that disagrees with you.
Very nice read I like the list
The truth however is, this list exists in theory, in books, and in discussions.
In real life... fascist can be anyone that disagrees with someone.
We can't deny that the word is overused
Many times it is used just to silence someone. And is starting to lose the meaning
and the geek shall inherit the earth
You don't defeat the Anti-Whites by constantly retreating and apologizing. The only path to victory is to constantly engage them in debates and then win those debates, thus making them look foolish. Sure, that's not easy and we're going to lose a fair amount of those debates, but we need to treat those as a challenge to get better next time. They have nothing to offer other than fear and intimidation - whereas we have the truth on our side.
But we also need to chose our battles wisely - this is after all a battle of the minds, fought almost entirely on the intellectual plain - and avoid making ourselves look foolish.
For instance, this statement is mixing in some talking points that our enemies will often love to use against us.
This has nothing to do with people speaking a language or "violent criminals" or anything like that - no, they're not us. They don't have our connection to our ancestral home lands, they don't have our bio-spirit.
We also shouldn't use the term "violent criminals" - because this only applies to a small portion of those people, most of them are just genuinely seeking a better life - lead by false promises made by the Anti-Whites. Calling them criminals is neither fair towards those people (who often come from really bad places!), it also completely defeats our very own position, making us look very foolish and ridiculous in the eyes of the Anti-Whites.
I love my people, I love my ancestors and embrace their heritage and achievements. But I extend that very same love and understanding to all other Non-White peoples out there. I want them to be happy as well, I want them to live a fulfilled life, where they can prosper, have a family and grow. I just strongly object to them doing that in our ancestral home lands - that's all.
But we shouldn't call them "dangerous criminals" or even "invaders" - that's only going to lead to violence and possibly the complete and total destruction of this very planet that we're living on.
Our most important task is that we need to re-learn how to love ourselves and our own kind again. And that we need to free ourselves from this ridiculous notion that this will inevitably lead to us hating others. The White Race is only a very tiny minority on this planet, about 8% of the total human population if I remember correctly - we can only survive by peacefully cooperating and co-existing with Non-White peoples, not by hating them.
And while we might see them as Invaders - it's been our very own Anti-White politicians who've been incentivizing them to do so for decades - and those Anti-White elites are our enemies, not the huge masses of Non-White civilians; we'd do the exact same thing if we were in their shoes.
It's one of those mind games that the Anti-Whites inflict upon us - they want to make us believe that us standing up for our own group interest and us loving our own heritage will inevitably lead to Non-White suffering. It is what we call a "Meme Pathogen" - checkout You don't defeat the Anti-Whites by constantly retreating and apologizing. The only path to victory is to constantly engage them in debates and then win those debates, thus making them look foolish. Sure, that's not easy and we're going to lose a fair amount of those debates, but we need to treat those as a challenge to get better next time. They have nothing to offer other than fear and intimidation - whereas we have the truth on our side.
But we also need to chose our battles wisely - this is after all a battle of the minds, fought almost entirely on the intellectual plain - and avoid making ourselves look foolish.
For instance, this statement is mixing in some talking points that our enemies will often love to use against us.
This has nothing to do with people speaking a language or "violent criminals" or anything like that - no, they're not us. They don't have our connection to our ancestral home lands, they don't have our bio-spirit.
We also shouldn't use the term "violent criminals" - because this only applies to a small portion of those people, most of them are just genuinely seeking a better life - lead by false promises made by the Anti-Whites. Calling them criminals is neither fair towards those people (who often come from really bad places!), it also completely defeats our very own position, making us look very foolish and ridiculous in the eyes of the Anti-Whites.
I love my people, I love my ancestors and embrace their heritage and achievements. But I extend that very same love and understanding to all other Non-White peoples out there. I want them to be happy as well, I want them to live a fulfilled life, where they can prosper, have a family and grow. I just strongly object to them doing that in our ancestral home lands - that's all.
But we shouldn't call them "dangerous criminals" or even "invaders" - that's only going to lead to violence and possibly the complete and total destruction of this very planet that we're living on.
Our most important task is that we need to re-learn how to love ourselves and our own kind again. And that we need to free ourselves from this ridiculous notion that this will inevitably lead to us hating others. The White Race is only a very tiny minority on this planet, about 8% of the total human population if I remember correctly - we can only survive by peacefully cooperating and co-existing with Non-White peoples, not by hating them.
And while we might see them as Invaders - it's been our very own Anti-White politicians who've been incentivizing them to do so for decades - and those Anti-White elites are our enemies, not the huge masses of Non-White civilians; we'd do the exact same thing if we were in their shoes.
It's one of those mind games that the Anti-Whites inflict upon us - they want to make us believe that us standing up for our own group interest and us loving our own heritage will inevitably lead to Non-White suffering. Checkout www.nowhiteguilt.org for more information.
If you want to learn more about those camps and are interested in historic details, you could for instance checkout David Irving's excellent books on this topic.
However, I wouldn't recommend this in a general conversation - you can argue as much as you want about those camps, but the general public has been fed the Hollywood narrative for way too long and it's also illegal in most European countries to even discuss these topics.
From my experience, you'll have a much easier talk talking to average people if you stay clear of those loaded topics and instead use your own language. Tell them that there is no shame in loving your own people, your ancestors and your heritage - and how ridiculous it is to assume that this would automatically lead towards violence against others.
Since you guys are apparently not debating historic events, let me re-emphasize the following again - and please do not dismiss this as a "conspiracy theory":
We have been told since early childhood that any attempt of White People to choose their own destiny, for us to feel Pride for our Ancestor's Heritage and Achievements, for us to even just exist as a unique people - let alone us having our own sovereign homeland - that all of that would inevitably lead towards Non-White suppression, death and suffering.
There have been countless Hollywood movies portraying our peoples as the ultimate evil, countless movies where the above was reinforced and hammered into our childhood brains.
But all of that is completely ridiculous - and does any of you really seriously believe that we're going to build Concentration Camps in which we're going to kill Non-Whites? Come on, how ridiculous is that!
I have absolutely no problem with an open historic discussion and research of that topic - but anybody who's even just trying to suggest that we, our children or grandchildren might even consider building such camps - such a person is trying to deliver an Anti-White message to make us afraid to stand up for our own interests.
It's also quite ridiculous - at the moment, the White Race is maybe some ~8% of the total human population - we're certainly not going to fight our way out of that mess that we're currently in! And Concentration Camps would only result in the entire planet teaming up against us - a fight impossibly to win.
@Taenaeris
That Jason guy is hilarious, just listened to his synthicide on YouTube. Not sure if he started this 'White Well-Being' meme. lol
- - - Updated - - -
It's just drama. But yeah, some people will take it seriously and protest on the streets, then they'll get tired and go home. No big deal.