1. #23081
    Quote Originally Posted by DarkTZeratul View Post
    I see this argument a lot, and it's largely wrong. This is absolutely the reason the 3/5ths compromise exists, to be sure, but it also has little to do with why the electoral college exists. Any connections to slavery are largely a result of how slavery was a major consideration in how the systems of government as a whole were structured and were not the primary arguments for the Electoral College in particular. Noxx79 largely has the right of it, here, as Alexander Hamilton states in The Federalist 68:
    Yeah Alexander and most of the founders loathed the idea of direct democracy. But the end result was the entire constitution was one giant appeasement to slaveholders which resulted in a distorted congressional and therefore EC representation.

    As far as I'm concerned the statement still stands easily.
    “Logic: The art of thinking and reasoning in strict accordance with the limitations and incapacities of the human misunderstanding.”
    "Conservative, n: A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal who wishes to replace them with others."
    Ambrose Bierce
    The Bird of Hermes Is My Name, Eating My Wings To Make Me Tame.

  2. #23082
    Quote Originally Posted by Aehl View Post
    ..I take it you dont understand how the College works or why it exists.
    It exists to keep the slave states happy because they had numbers of slaves who wouldn't have counted towards the election result. So the founders in their infinite stupidity bowed to them to the point Pre Civil war Virginia basically decided the winner of every election and South Carolina never allowed people to vote for the president prior to the civil war.

    Today it's not fit for purpose

  3. #23083
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    40,015
    Trump's threat to investigate the investigators takes a misstep today. By which I mean, trips and knocks out some of its teeth.

    DOJ chooses not to prosecute Comey for leaking on the grounds of...actually you'll like this.

    in part because they didn't believe there was evidence to show Comey knew and intended to violate laws on handling classified information
    That's right, rabid fanbase. Turns out, if Trump gets to hide behind ignorance is an excuse, it applies to everyone else, too.

    Oh, and it wasn't a close call, either.

  4. #23084
    The Undying
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    the Quiet Room
    Posts
    34,554
    Quote Originally Posted by Breccia View Post
    Trump's threat to investigate the investigators takes a misstep today. By which I mean, trips and knocks out some of its teeth.

    DOJ chooses not to prosecute Comey for leaking on the grounds of...actually you'll like this.



    That's right, rabid fanbase. Turns out, if Trump gets to hide behind ignorance is an excuse, it applies to everyone else, too.

    Oh, and it wasn't a close call, either.
    It's actually even worse. The evidence in question wasn't classified at the time Comey decided to disseminate it. This upcoming Comey issue is going to be grist for the far right insanity propaganda mill. They'll ignore all the facts and just focus on "both sides" and "Comey was guilty we just chose the higher road" bullshit.

  5. #23085
    Void Lord Breccia's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    40,015
    Quote Originally Posted by cubby View Post
    "Comey was guilty we just chose the higher road" .
    At which point, you and I will drag out Trump's TOTAL EXONORATION and shove it down their throats.

  6. #23086
    The Undying
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    the Quiet Room
    Posts
    34,554
    Quote Originally Posted by Breccia View Post
    At which point, you and I will drag out Trump's TOTAL EXONORATION and shove it down their throats.
    Indeed, I'll bring the beer (whiskey actually).

    Seriously though, the write up on this entire ridiculousness is horrific. It's basically Trump's personal attorney Attorney General and IG creating a big mass of nothing, based on information that was classified at the lowest level after Comey released it (I wonder why it was classified ) and then, based on that, the IG recommending that Comey be prosecuted but the AG saying they will choose not to.

    The Trumpkins will read "both sides leaked!" and "Comey helped Clinton (lose?)!" while reality tells us there was never any thing wrong with Comey's actions to begin with - which we already knew.

    At least Trump finally got his witch hunt.

  7. #23087
    Quote Originally Posted by Kallisto View Post
    It exists to keep the slave states happy because they had numbers of slaves who wouldn't have counted towards the election result. So the founders in their infinite stupidity bowed to them to the point Pre Civil war Virginia basically decided the winner of every election and South Carolina never allowed people to vote for the president prior to the civil war.

    Today it's not fit for purpose
    Remove the EC, user the popular vote, and a few states pick the President for eternity.

    Then again thats why you want it removed. It would be SO much easier if there werent any pesky opponents and California picked the President for eternity.....LMAO

    Dream on.

    Even if you were able to get it onto the table, 38 of the 50 legislatures would never agree.
    Last edited by Aehl; 2019-08-02 at 02:20 AM.

  8. #23088
    I am Murloc! Noxx79's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Kansas. Yes, THAT Kansas.
    Posts
    5,474
    Quote Originally Posted by Aehl View Post
    Remove the EC, user the popular vote, and a few states pick the President for eternity.

    Then again thats why you want it removed. It would be SO much easier if there werent any pesky opponents and California picked the President for eternity.....LMAO

    Dream on.

    Even if you were able to get it onto the table, 38 of the 50 legislatures would never agree.
    You know California has a large number of conservative voters. As does NY.

    Lmao, it’s funny when people defend disenfranchisement. Especially when it’s their own.

  9. #23089
    Quote Originally Posted by Aehl View Post
    Remove the EC, user the popular vote, and a few states pick the President for eternity.

    Then again thats why you want it removed. It would be SO much easier if there werent any pesky opponents and California picked the President for eternity.....LMAO

    Dream on.

    Even if you were able to get it onto the table, 38 of the 50 legislatures would never agree.
    The EC is an outdated concept and has been for hundreds of years. If you don't live in swing states your votes don't even matter. Guess people in sold blue/red states don't exist and therefore don't matter. Must suck to live in one of those states as the minority party.

  10. #23090
    Herald of the Titans
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    2,854
    Quote Originally Posted by Aehl View Post
    Remove the EC, user the popular vote, and a few states pick the President for eternity.

    Then again thats why you want it removed. It would be SO much easier if there werent any pesky opponents and California picked the President for eternity.....LMAO

    Dream on.

    Even if you were able to get it onto the table, 38 of the 50 legislatures would never agree.
    Remove the EC, use the popular vote, and more states than before picks the popular vote. And those states will probably have more people in them than before.
    Keep the EC and a few states pick the President.

    In either system campaigning only in LA, Chicago, NY and Dallas won't win you the election as it's to small a population in those places. However I'm sure that the GOP would love to get 6 million votes out of California. Votes that today are useless in the presidential election.
    - Lars

  11. #23091
    Quote Originally Posted by Aehl View Post
    Remove the EC, user the popular vote, and a few states pick the President for eternity.

    Then again thats why you want it removed. It would be SO much easier if there werent any pesky opponents and California picked the President for eternity.....LMAO

    Dream on.

    Even if you were able to get it onto the table, 38 of the 50 legislatures would never agree.
    Yeah, fuck letting the people decide.

    All the EC does, is make small town people more powerful than other people. Farmer Joe's vote shouldn't carry more weight than Banker Bob's. They should be equal.

    But the truth of the matter is that you, like all conservatives, will argue whatever side of an issue you need to, to get what you want. If the EC hurt your agenda, you'd be against it. Conservatives, no longer have morals or ethics.
    "When Facism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." - Unknown

  12. #23092
    The Unstoppable Force Ghostpanther's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    USA, Ohio
    Posts
    24,112
    Quote Originally Posted by Aehl View Post
    Remove the EC, user the popular vote, and a few states pick the President for eternity.

    Then again thats why you want it removed. It would be SO much easier if there werent any pesky opponents and California picked the President for eternity.....LMAO

    Dream on.

    Even if you were able to get it onto the table, 38 of the 50 legislatures would never agree.
    I agree. It is not going to happen in the US and for good reasons as you pointed out. It is a pipe dream for the left.

    And at least this thread seems to have switched from the dead Mueller investigation to another topic.
    " If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher.." - Abraham Lincoln
    The Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to - prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms..” - Samuel Adams

  13. #23093
    The Insane Daelak's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    15,964
    Quote Originally Posted by Aehl View Post
    Remove the EC, user the popular vote, and a few states pick the President for eternity.

    Then again thats why you want it removed. It would be SO much easier if there werent any pesky opponents and California picked the President for eternity.....LMAO

    Dream on.

    Even if you were able to get it onto the table, 38 of the 50 legislatures would never agree.
    This doesnt even make sense when you tally up the total number of eligible voters.
    Quote Originally Posted by zenkai View Post
    There is a problem, but I know just banning guns will fix the problem.

  14. #23094
    Quote Originally Posted by Bodakane View Post
    Yeah, fuck letting the people decide.

    All the EC does, is make small town people more powerful than other people. Farmer Joe's vote shouldn't carry more weight than Banker Bob's. They should be equal.
    Only as long as you would agree that their wealth should be equal as well.

    Otherwise Banker Bob would have outsized influence overall (and as studies show things like personal campaign contributions do influence politics), and different "voting weight" could be perfect equalizer for things that really shouldn't depend on wealth.

  15. #23095
    When Texas turns blue and Florida becomes reliably blue republicans will suddenly support abolishing the EC. It will happen, just a matter of how soon. Texas going blue in 2020 is certainly a possibility. Another decade from now there's gonna be a lot fewer baby boomers.

    All of these nonsense arguments they make supporting the EC will suddenly vanish. Kind of like their moral fiber when they started supporting Trump.

  16. #23096
    Immortal Poopymonster's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Neverland Ranch Survivor
    Posts
    7,123
    Quote Originally Posted by Blur4stuff View Post
    When Texas turns blue and Florida becomes reliably blue republicans will suddenly support abolishing the EC. It will happen, just a matter of how soon. Texas going blue in 2020 is certainly a possibility. Another decade from now there's gonna be a lot fewer baby boomers.

    All of these nonsense arguments they make supporting the EC will suddenly vanish. Kind of like their moral fiber when they started supporting Trump.
    They have to do it. They believe you have to carry a baby to full term regardless of anything.
    Quote Originally Posted by Crissi View Post
    Quit using other posters as levels of crazy. That is not ok


    If you look, you can see the straw man walking a red herring up a slippery slope coming to join this conversation.

  17. #23097
    Quote Originally Posted by Shalcker View Post
    Only as long as you would agree that their wealth should be equal as well.

    Otherwise Banker Bob would have outsized influence overall (and as studies show things like personal campaign contributions do influence politics), and different "voting weight" could be perfect equalizer for things that really shouldn't depend on wealth.
    Ah yes the poiitics of envy:

    What is a socialist
    One who has yearnings
    For equal division of unequal earnings
    Idler or lazy they yell and they holler
    To fork out their dime and pocket your dollar


    - - - Updated - - -

    When Texas turns blue and Florida becomes reliably blue
    Martians will invade and the ICQ flower will turn purple with pink polka dots.

    Dream on.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Daelak View Post
    This doesnt even make sense when you tally up the total number of eligible voters.
    The EC exists for one main reason: population density. Otherwise three states would elect the President forever. Not happening and we both know why.

    In any case its all moot..this thread should die . There aint no more investigation, Mueller aint got jack shit, no collusion no nothing.
    A nothingburger...which is what I said it would be.

    What was that thread title? Oh yeah.

    "We are taking your President from you"

    That didnt age well..did it?

    LMAO

    Small fact, folks, the more the Dems lurch to the left, the more they embrace the lunatics, the more they gaurantee President Trump will be re elected.

    The Democrats are now a party where all 10 candidates on stage raised their hands to support health services for illegal immigrants. As recently as 2016, Hillary Clinton drew flak for not having fully embraced a New York plan to give driver's licenses to illegal immigrants. And no one aggressively challenged Julian Castro when he called for decriminalizing illegal border crossings.

    Does anyone here really think this WONT antagonise voters? Allowing ILLEGALS to be able to vote when they arent citizens?\

    Impeachment? Go right ahead..watch it backfire. But..believe what you will. Wont change anything. Just remember that back in 2016, the polls all said Clinton would be anointed...and they were all wrong. I see the same polls now say "Trump is unpopular"...theres only one poll that matters.

    It will be next year in November.

    Calling it now, President Trump will be re elected.
    Last edited by Aehl; 2019-08-03 at 04:46 AM.

  18. #23098
    Quote Originally Posted by Aehl View Post
    Ah yes the poiitics of envy:

    What is a socialist
    One who has yearnings
    For equal division of unequal earnings
    Idler or lazy they yell and they holler
    To fork out their dime and pocket your dollar

    Instead of popular vote modern US oligarchy could make "voting with your dollar" literal. All those laws removing caps certainly look like move in that direction.

    And that voting option would also see Hillary winning (based on total campaign contributions), just like popular vote.

  19. #23099
    The Insane Daelak's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    15,964
    Quote Originally Posted by Aehl View Post
    Ah yes the poiitics of envy:

    What is a socialist
    One who has yearnings
    For equal division of unequal earnings
    Idler or lazy they yell and they holler
    To fork out their dime and pocket your dollar


    - - - Updated - - -



    Martians will invade and the ICQ flower will turn purple with pink polka dots.

    Dream on.

    - - - Updated - - -



    The EC exists for one main reason: population density. Otherwise three states would elect the President forever. Not happening and we both know why.

    In any case its all moot..this thread should die . There aint no more investigation, Mueller aint got jack shit, no collusion no nothing.
    A nothingburger...which is what I said it would be.

    What was that thread title? Oh yeah.

    "We are taking your President from you"

    That didnt age well..did it?

    LMAO

    Small fact, folks, the more the Dems lurch to the left, the more they embrace the lunatics, the more they gaurantee President Trump will be re elected.

    The Democrats are now a party where all 10 candidates on stage raised their hands to support health services for illegal immigrants. As recently as 2016, Hillary Clinton drew flak for not having fully embraced a New York plan to give driver's licenses to illegal immigrants. And no one aggressively challenged Julian Castro when he called for decriminalizing illegal border crossings.

    Does anyone here really think this WONT antagonise voters? Allowing ILLEGALS to be able to vote when they arent citizens?\

    Impeachment? Go right ahead..watch it backfire. But..believe what you will. Wont change anything. Just remember that back in 2016, the polls all said Clinton would be anointed...and they were all wrong. I see the same polls now say "Trump is unpopular"...theres only one poll that matters.

    It will be next year in November.

    Calling it now, President Trump will be re elected.
    You still aren't understanding. If you as a presidential candidate even won ALL the votes of EVERY voter in California, New York, and Texas, you would wind up with only 22% of the total voting population in the US. Your campaign would crash and burn. Its simple addition.
    Quote Originally Posted by zenkai View Post
    There is a problem, but I know just banning guns will fix the problem.

  20. #23100
    Quote Originally Posted by Daelak View Post
    You still aren't understanding. If you as a presidential candidate even won ALL the votes of EVERY voter in California, New York, and Texas, you would wind up with only 22% of the total voting population in the US. Your campaign would crash and burn. Its simple addition.
    Dude is complaining about giving medical care to people. Math is probably tough as well.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •