Except:
1. Garrosh DID go back in time. It's an alternate universe, sure, but he also went back. Referenced in the WoD cinematic.
2. Gul'dan wasn't banished, per se, but he was imprisoned and powering the Dark Portal. I can see the stretch.
3. Ner'zhul absolutely did use his power to gain the trust of the Iron Horde by summoning the Dark Star. It was Grom, not Garrosh, but really goddam close.
4. Hellfire (Outland) was where Tanaan Jungle (WoD) was located. AND where the Dark Portal was in BOTH cases. 100% accurate.
5. The Iron Horde did dominate the Gronn. Repeatedly seen in quests, dungeons, and raids.
Overall, the leak was really accurate.
They also call out Saberon, and plenty of the plans Blizzard had for WoD before changes or they ultimately ended up cutting their losses. You're way off base on this one.
Last edited by GrimReaper673; 2019-09-04 at 03:53 PM. Reason: Further clarification.
Shadowlands isn't limited to just Azeroth.
Except you didn't check things at all. WoD was supposed to be a time travel expansion. It changed only in development when Blizzard realized they have piss-poor ability to pay attention to their own details or even fact check them and ended up with a ton of continuity errors. So they swapped it to "lel it's an alternate universe, don't count the discrepancies plox". Farahlon was planned but got scrapped. Zangar sea was planned but got scrapped (Blizzard even already made some artwork for fungal whales inhabiting it). The bit about Terokkar is correct, it's just that Terokkar was renamed in Draenor. Most of the "wholly inaccurate paragraph" ended up in War Crimes. Hellfire Peninsula was a jungle in WoD. And the Iron Horde did dominate the Gronn and ride on top of them like the Haradrim did on the mumakils...
Would be really hard not to imagine Arthas in some capacity. AFAIK, he went straight to Shadowlands.
I would like to see Kaelthas and his daughter working together in the Shadowlands (i mean... we have never seen this 2 characters together), and have them eventually work with the Horde.
1. 26 seconds in the cinematic subtitles state "35 years ago." Garrosh is there. Therefore, he went back in time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLzhlsEFcVQ
2. The premise was correct, they had the son instead of the father. Close enough for leak season.
3. Shadowmoon questline shows Ner'zhul summoning the Dark Star to gain the Iron Horde's favor. Starts 20 seconds into the video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkW4j3rOyGs
4. This is also wrong: Hellfire is a jungle where Garrosh is constructing the Dark Portal so he can invade Azeroth and 'make things right'. - You absolutely said it was inaccurate.
5. The gronn are used in the introductory quest chain in Tanaan, the end quest in Frostfire Ridge, in BRF, and in Grimrail Depot at a minimum. Seems sufficient enough to illustrate that the Iron Horde has subdued them.
- - - Updated - - -
1. Farahlon development and subsequent abandonment. Wowpedia, sure, but interviews with game designers as sources.
https://wow.gamepedia.com/Farahlon_(alternate_universe)
2. Zangar Sea wowpedia. Not nearly as fleshed out, admittedly, but concept art for fungal whales, and twitter mentions from devs make it safe to say it was planned at some point.
https://wow.gamepedia.com/Zangar_Sea
Uh, huh. One needs to be super "wise" to see the greatness of garbage like WoD's resolution where people just forget about what the Iron Horde did. And here's the Blizzcon 2013 coverage in regards to WoD's announcement: https://www.mmo-champion.com/content...ft-What-s-Next
Would you look at that, the initial design was about time travel and that is explicitly mentioned. Together with Farahlon being content planned for a later patch (scrapping of which was flat out by Blizzard in wowhead's interview with Cory Stockton). They only changed it to an alternate universe when WoD was already in testing because they fucked up and wrote discrepancies like Rulkhan being still alive and told people not to "count the blades of grass" when they pointed out the continuity errors.
And given how I outright told you that Zangar sea already had concept for some creatures in it, all you had was to google it. Stop expecting other people to do all the job for you because you've been caught talking about something you have no idea about, yet feel the need to defend Blizzard regardless.
Here, the fungal whales: https://wow.gamepedia.com/Fungal_whale And since the zone has a wowpedia page, you could have checked at least that: https://wow.gamepedia.com/Zangar_Sea Would you look at that, it was also supposed to have light towers and an island was mentioned. Never mind that the Zangar sea is actually in the game... It's just devoid of anything significant and you just don't know it.
Also, I didn't say anything about what Blizzard should have done. I merely said what they did. Including scrapping content. So spare me your misguided "I don't know who you are" white knighting that you built on a blatant misrepresentation of what I said (and your ignorance about the topic in general).
Lie to myself about what, exactly? Did I say leaks in general are true? Nope. I said your arguments (and not even all of them, just most) against a single particular leak were false. So how about you stop deflecting with weak-ass straw-men because you were caught talking about something you had no clue about (while somehow feeling the strange need to throw in white knighting for Blizzard into it) and simply admit you were wrong? It ain't that hard.
This is one of the rare cases in which a "leak" was actually mostly genuine, but it also occurred 4-5 days from the announcement at BlizzCon, which likely means someone received a presser from Blizzard about the content of the Con and decided to blast it over the Internet as opposed to sitting on it like they were supposed to. This does occasionally happen - generally really close to an expansion's actual announcement in the form of press materials and leaked builds. The further you are from the announcement date the more "pie in the sky" leaks tend to be, generally speaking.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead