No, feral are actually good. Way ahead of ret and enh. Feral can easily reach top 5.
- - - Updated - - -
If vanilla were a failure the game wouldn't be where it is today. Just because you don't enjoy / something doesn't appeal to you, it does not make it a failure.
Yes? and the guy i quoted said that classic (which is known for being the worst in balance) said that in regards to class stacking its better than BFA, when not even the world first needed to class stack, you are dense AF go back to school so you can learn to read again.
- - - Updated - - -
Quoted for truth, i cant stop laughing when people say that classes in classic had depth when they are 1 button rotation or just autoattacks, you can be mentally handicapped and still top the charts on classic.
--- Want any of my Constitutional rights?, ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
I come from a time and a place where I judge people by the content of their character; I don't give a damn if you are tall or short; gay or straight; Jew or Gentile; White, Black, Brown or Green; Conservative or Liberal. -- Note to mods: if you are going to infract me have the decency to post the reason, and expect to hold everyone else to the same standard.
I don't know what I'm talking about, yet the feral druid in my own guild who has a few of the rank 1 parses for feral dps right now on classic is basically bottom of the dps with the top dps doing 3x as much damage. There are literally zero (0) logs on private servers or classic where Feral is doing anywhere near what would be viable damage relative to the top classes, if it was retail people would be crying to the stars at how bad the spec is but in your eyes because this is classic doing 1/3-1/2 of the dps of your other raiders while getting a rank 1 parse is somehow competitive?
By all means prove me wrong, with some actual proof rather than soothing your feelings by telling me I don't know what I'm talking about. Being better than Ret is not the same thing as being competitive with rogues and mages.
Last edited by Bigbazz; 2019-09-17 at 10:58 PM.
Probably running on a Pentium 4
Isn't warrior technically a hybrid?
OT: Something parses and logs don't show is buffs - unfortunately .. and only caring about DPS ends up killing any type of support class. Though, this is a little extreme.
You can have the classic experience and still fix some of these classes.
Last edited by Self Inflicted Wounds; 2019-09-17 at 10:59 PM.
Sort of. I would consider them hybrids in the same way that Priests are. I think the primary difference would be that typically a Warrior or a Priest primarily specs into one of their two roles and they can't readily jump between those as effectively as the other hybrids.
“The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.
Generally no1 talks about vanilla class output from the perspective of prebis/mc, it's pointless. BWL will be the 40 man raid that lasts the longest, from P3 to P5, then we can start talking actual tiers, because right now only rogues and warriors exist and sometimes mages.
But sure, you're completely right that feral in prebis isn't as good as the current S tiers, even though no1 cares about this tier, at all.
The problem with that is that mages and rogues and warriors all scale far better than feral. As far as i know, ferals are currently wearing BiS pieces for not just this phase, but the entire game (crowd control pummeler, the energy helm that i can't remember its name). I don't really think there's a light at the end of this tunnel.
hmm..a frost specced war that is able to heal and has awesome combat skills. *NEERRRRRRF!*
The hunter hoe with the least beloe.