Who's to say he doesn't just change the rules like with Garland and says it's an election year coming up, let's let the people decide. Who's to stop him?
And I believe that recent polls showed the majority of Americans against impeachment...granted that was before all this.
Umm, nothing? It isn't like Trump is popular in Pelosi's district, and if he had any dirt on her he would have used it a long time ago.
If he threatens something really crazy, like nuking Iran if she doesn't... well don't think Pelosi was dumb enough to take the call without hitting the record button.
"It's just like I always said! You can do battle with strength, you can do battle with wits, but no weapon can beat a great pair of tits!"
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/24/u...core-ios-share
To quote one of Trump's favorite people, "Womp womp."The White House has determined that it will most likely have to allow the whistle-blower who filed an explosive complaint about President Trump to meet with congressional investigators, two people briefed on the matter said Tuesday.
The meeting could give Democrats a stream of evidence as they consider whether to impeach the president. Such a meeting would allow the whistle-blower to share at least some details of the complaint he filed — which relates to Mr. Trump’s efforts to get the Ukrainian government to investigate former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and his son — even if the actual document is not handed over to Congress.
The administration had originally barred the whistle-blower’s complaint from being shared with Congress, arguing that it did not meet the legal definitions of a matter under the purview of office of the director of national intelligence.
But on Monday, amid building political pressure from both Democrats and Republicans on Capitol Hill, the administration began the process of reversing that decision.
Interesting. And Roberts has turned out to be a decent person. And he would be all over getting things going, because, you know, the law and everything. I'll be curious to see how it plays out. And on the flip side, perhaps the offense is so egregious that the GOP pulls an @Skroe and we see a wave of GOP Senators voting for impeachment. It would be the smart thing to do ("My hands were tied. Trump broke the law. No one is above the law." /heart Pelosi). They would still get Pence replacing RBG if she is out before Jan/2021 because Pence.
Lol, he is the best bestiliest deal maker ever after all. I would love to have heard that conversation.I am not sure. This is Trump still under the delusion that he knows how to make a deal. Best case scenario, he says something really stupid during the call to Pelosi that bites him in the ass. Otherwise this is entirely expected behavior (That probably also counts as obstruction of justice)
- - - Updated - - -
And that's his biggest problem. When he leaves office, he's going to spend the rest of his life in court. Possibly jail.
"It's just like I always said! You can do battle with strength, you can do battle with wits, but no weapon can beat a great pair of tits!"
"If you are ever asking yourself 'Is Trump lying or is he stupid?', the answer is most likely C: All of the Above" - Seth Meyers
There is no way in hell that the turtle agreed to a deal that involved President Pelosi. I find it entirely likely that he wouldn't mind dealing with President Pence.
And sadly, despite my previous comments about him not controlling the impeachment (Which is true), he still controls enough votes that Pelosi and he would have to make a deal.
He's not that fucking dumb, and he seems to have largely insulated himself from the more questionable behavior outside of going out and defending it publicly (which doesn't directly connect him). We'll end with President Pence if it moves forward and is successful, but I wouldn't be surprised if he does pardon Trump both to "start the healing process and prevent further division in the country" (think a la Nixon) and to keep the Trump base from completely revolting. Because if he doesn't I could absolutely seem them either abandoning the GOP or turning on establishment/moderate Republicans hard and going all-in for the right wing nutjobs.
On one hand, I'm relieved that the side I belong to has at least done the right thing, in opening the impeachment inquiry.
On the other hand, this is The. Gamble. Of. The. Century. We are literally gambling for American Democracy here, that there'll be something in this inquiry and inevitable impeachment so solid and irrefutable, that even when Senate Republicans acquit Trump of impeachable offenses, the voters will not be able to ignore that come November. I'm definitely one of the people who understood Pelosi pushing off impeachment, because a failed impeachment risks amplifying the "witch hunt" narrative Trump has so effectively deployed among the 80+% of Republicans who approve of him. Policy wonks have long said Pelosi was delaying impeachment inquiries til the fall so the actual impeachment falls squarely in the summer election season, and I think she's probably nailed it. That they lined it up a little bit early (initial thoughts were October/November) to coincide with what seems to be the clearest impeachable offense yet is probably fine. In every poll taken so far, impeachment has been way low on the list of priorities for voters, so the Dem candidates and eventual nominee needs to stay on message with all the issues and let Pelosi/Schiff/Schumer run the show in Congress.
Now we really need to put our balls on the table, so to speak. No more Barr-setting-the-message-for-the-Mueller-report moments. Hammer it relentlessly. I want to see Adam Schiff (best House rep for this, imo) on TV every day talking about the fucking nonsense this Administration has gotten up to. I want to see this Administration beg for mercy, and when none of it is forthcoming, resign en masse and hope to avoid prosecution. And I want to see the inquiry delve into everything. Everything that Trump has obstructed over the past 3 years, imo, is under the scope of this inquiry. They dug and dug and dug for one lie about a blowjob for Clinton - let's do the same. Except, in our case, all the digging will be to expose the vastness of the corruption and rot in this Administration.
There will be a great documentary about these few years, in a decade or two....if we survive it.
There's no doubt in my mind that this president deserves to be impeached, removed and imprisoned. I know that successful impeachment is unlikely given Republican control of the Senate, but it has to be done anyway. I also don't think the risk of a failed impeachment backfiring is nearly as bad as some make it out to be. The truth is presidents need to be limited, more limited than they have been and this one has made that more obvious than ever before. If lines are not drawn now future presidents will be even more bold and even more dangerous. Blatantly abusing power like this results in swift removal in any properly functioning democracy. No one, regardless of party, should be allowed to abuse government powers for their personal gain, and no one is above the law.
Which leads to an interesting dilemma for Trump. If he gets voted out of office in 2020, then he can either attempt to pardon himself as a lame duck, or else face the rest of his life under continuous criminal investigations. However, if he leaves office early, Pence has more or less free reign to pardon him, since it won't hurt Pence's already abysmal chances in the general election.
So it may be in Trump's personal best interests to resign beforehand. And as we all know, it is his personal interests that matter most to him. If he has a Presidential pardon, he can still go on to run his own TV network where he screams about how he was wronged.