This is not a powerscaling thread. Now that the civil war of BfA is over, I wanted to see who people thought was the better antagonist for the Alliance + Honor gang. Who between Garrosh and Sylvanas had the better motivations for acting the way they did, who had a bigger impact, who was handled better as a villain, who represented a bigger obstacle, who had the more satisfying demise, etc.
As far as I'm concerned, I think Garrosh was handled much better. Even if his turn from pragmatic leader to full on lunatic was rushed, he had more understandable motivations and the war he started was just developed much better (it wasn't resolved in 2 patches but characterized two different expansions instead). Also I liked the rivalry between Garrosh and Varian, I thought they were very interesting parallels on two different sides (until MoP), and I also really enjoyed that scene where Garrosh crushes Anduin against the bell. It shows to what lengths he is willing to go to "deliver a message" to Varian. In comparison, I felt nothing during the confrontations between Sylvanas and Anduin, I didn't feel any chemistry between them as rivals. I also just think that the whole rebellion against Garrosh was displayed better. I'm not even talking about the raid, I just preferred how you had to defend the darkspear villages from Garrosh's forces, remove his army from Razor Hill, then contend with his kor'kron in the Barrens... MoP did a much better job in displaying an actual rebellion against a tyrant.