Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ...
2
3
4
5
6
LastLast
  1. #61
    In theory that's true. But in reality it's not.

    Because when it comes to anything involving the internet... or electricity in general... legislation is basically still stuck in 1950.
    Politicians don't know shit about modern technology and they frankly don't seem to care, as they seem to prefer riding on the wave of 'video games cause highschool shootings, we should probably just band the internet and put a pricetag on net neutrality'.

    Due to that, gaming companies, or software companies in general, are basically free to do whatever the fuck they want as long as they put a single clause into their 800 page EULA. Like, that one South Park episode with the human cent-iPad was actually not that far off in that regard.

    Recently I heard something about Denmark (iirc) looking into actually changing some of these retarded laws and making it so that this whole 'you only own the rights to play the game, but the actual game is still ours' would finally die and you'd get the actual rights to your purchase. and not just access to their servers for as long as they allow it. But I'm afraid companies would just stop selling their games in Denmark then.

    I'm afraid we're still a couple dozens of years away from politics getting to the point of being up2date with the reality of 2010, let alone 2019 - maybe we'll have such regulations by 2050.

  2. #62
    Quote Originally Posted by Sorotia View Post
    Umm you pay for the license...like you're paying rent to use the license. You don't own anything...even if you play till the day it shuts down it is going to shut down some day so there is no keeping anything.

    Anyone who plays a MMO knows this...
    Well, buying the game and paying for your subscription on top of that feels like buying a house and still having to pay the rent to be allowed to live there.

    I am charged monthly so I can use photoshop but I didn't have to buy it. I agree WoW's business model is quite greedy.
    he/him/his • please go check out Nazdorei (Playable Naga Concept) and Kul Tiran Female Edit.

  3. #63
    I mean i think Blizzard is dumb and doesn't handle situations like this in the right way but OP you are dumb as it gets.

  4. #64
    OP has an EU mentality. Only there would ideas such as this be entertained.

  5. #65
    I am Murloc! Phookah's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Zebes, SR-21
    Posts
    5,886
    Quote Originally Posted by retrogame View Post
    Tbh, you need to be stupid to waste your time and money on something that is not yours and could be taken away any second lol
    You should probably stop playing video games since anything short of a disk based single player game thats offline entirely is subject to be "taken" from you. I'd read a ToS sometime, you'll be really enlightened.

  6. #66
    Quote Originally Posted by FelPlague View Post
    sorta like paying for acsess to a gym.
    paying to go to a concert
    paying to watch a movie
    paying to go to a play

    so on so forth, you pay to go do something but you get nothing phsyical, and if you act like a massive asshole they will kick you out with 0 refund.

    What you are describing is a service. If you don't like a movie, or act up in a theater and get kicked out, you don't get your money back.

    Blizzard games are a service.

    OP is confused on the difference between goods and services.

  7. #67
    By this logic, a themepark is not allowed to expell me once I start harrassing other customers. I paid for the ticket right?

  8. #68
    Over 9000! Kithelle's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Somewhere where canon still exists
    Posts
    9,481
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Mama View Post
    Well, buying the game and paying for your subscription on top of that feels like buying a house and still having to pay the rent to be allowed to live there.

    I am charged monthly so I can use photoshop but I didn't have to buy it. I agree WoW's business model is quite greedy.
    I never said it is great, I'm just saying you don't really "own" anything so you can't sue them.

  9. #69
    Quote Originally Posted by retrogame View Post
    You purchase a physical product, its yours. You are the owner of this product and no one has the right to take it from you. Same this with virtual goods. You pay, its yours.
    As a general rule, true. but physical goods can also come with terms and conditions that muddy the waters. Financing a car, for example. Or purchasing a condo.

    If you purchase WoW with all of the expansions, then the characters you create and the account is your ownership. Blizzard has no right to take them from you with bans or any other means that would result you not having access to the account.
    This isn't true. You may want it to be true, but it is not. You are paying to access servers and specific content, not buying anything outright.

    I can’t believe people defend this. This won’t affect you now, but it might in the future. You invest your money and time towards something you own, as you paid, and then some dumbass gm with a bad day just will take your ownership of the account, without any consequences.
    You are mistaking "understanding" something for "defending" it. Software licenses are a thing and functionally very similar. I don't defend the practice, but I understand the terms that I am agreeing to when sign up for the service. If I am not prepared to agree to the terms, I don't subscribe.

    Blizzard Terms of service are not above the law, when you accept those terms, you are being forced to, because if you decline you wont be able to play.
    They are not above the law, but you also do not get to toss them aside simply because you don't like them. And you are not being forced to do anything. You can simply choose not to agree with them and not play the game. They are not coercing you.

    Ye ye many companies do same strategies, but perhaps change?
    I agree that change is possible and a worthwhile goal, but it is not simple, nor is it likely. Large corporations are heavily incentivized to operate this way as it offers them protection. Not liking the methodology doesn't invalidate it. If you want it to change you have to actively attempt to create that change. Talking about it on a fan forum isn't that, though.

  10. #70
    Immortal Nnyco's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Haomarush
    Posts
    7,841
    Quote Originally Posted by retrogame View Post
    Tbh, you need to be stupid to waste your time and money on something that is not yours and could be taken away any second lol
    So if i rent an appartment i should just let it rot and not waste my time and money because i dont own it?
    Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
    Crabs have been removed from the game... because if I see another one I’m just going to totally lose it. *sobbing* I’m sorry, I just can’t right now... I just... OK just give me a minute, I’ll be OK..

  11. #71
    Quote Originally Posted by retrogame View Post
    Tbh, you need to be stupid to waste your time and money on something that is not yours and could be taken away any second lol
    Hi people rent houses.
    RETH

  12. #72
    The corporate dicksucking in this thread is hilarious.

    It feels like im watching a gameplay of Syndicate

  13. #73
    One reason it is this way is because what exactly do you own? The character? What does that mean exactly? You own the data on the server? I think you’d agree you don’t own the copyright to the artwork so do you just own access to it? So they have to let you play even if you don’t pay your subscription? Or just “access” to it which what does that mean anyway? What if you could only see the data. Or you could get into game but you’re stuck in a small room where you only see your bags, bank and character. Is that access? see where this is going?

  14. #74
    Quote Originally Posted by Sorotia View Post
    I never said it is great, I'm just saying you don't really "own" anything so you can't sue them.
    That's true and I agree.
    he/him/his • please go check out Nazdorei (Playable Naga Concept) and Kul Tiran Female Edit.

  15. #75
    Quote Originally Posted by retrogame View Post
    You purchase a physical product, its yours. You are the owner of this product and no one has the right to take it from you. Same this with virtual goods. You pay, its yours.

    If you purchase WoW with all of the expansions, then the characters you create and the account is your ownership. Blizzard has no right to take them from you with bans or any other means that would result you not having access to the account.

    I can’t believe people defend this. This won’t affect you now, but it might in the future. You invest your money and time towards something you own, as you paid, and then some dumbass gm with a bad day just will take your ownership of the account, without any consequences.

    Blizzard Terms of service are not above the law, when you accept those terms, you are being forced to, because if you decline you wont be able to play.

    Ye ye many companies do same strategies, but perhaps change?
    Without trying to sound offensive, you literally don't know what you are talking about. There are no "goods" involved here. You're paying for access to a service. You agree to certain terms in order to use that service, and those terms include your agreement to getting banned and having your access revoked without reimbursement if Blizzard decides to do so.

    Think of it this way: you're buying a ticket to an amusement park. You go in there, use the rides, even play in the playground and build an amazing sandcastle of your own. That doesn't mean you OWN the sandcastle, and if you get drunk and throw a fit, you get thrown out of the park and banned from getting in again - even if your ticket was an annual pass. And you don't get to keep the sandcastle you built either.

    All that being said, local legislation may differ in some of the details. Digital rights is still a nascent area of law, and there's gaps in the legislation in many places. You can try and challenge some of the aspects if you so choose (and have the money to go up against a corporation's legal team) but the general idea of the transaction is sound in most parts of the world by now. You are not paying for a product, you are paying for the (revocable) right to use a service.

  16. #76
    Quote Originally Posted by PelinalWhitestrake View Post
    The corporate dicksucking in this thread is hilarious.

    It feels like im watching a gameplay of Syndicate
    Not really. It's not like people are stating that they love the ToS/EULA, it's mostly people stating facts as they are. People even encouraged the OP to try and sue Blizzard for being banned if they feel that strongly about it.
    3 hints to surviving MMO-C forums:
    1.) If you have an opinion, someone will say that it is wrong
    2.) If you have a source, there will be people who refuse to believe it
    3.) If you use logic, it will be largely ignored
    btw: Spires of Arak = Arakkoa.

  17. #77
    Herald of the Titans
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Taco Bell
    Posts
    2,599
    Quote Originally Posted by retrogame View Post
    Blizzard Terms of service are not above the law, when you accept those terms, you are being forced to, because if you decline you wont be able to play.
    This is working as expected.
    I'm a crazy taco.

  18. #78
    Quote Originally Posted by retrogame View Post
    You purchase a physical product, its yours. You are the owner of this product and no one has the right to take it from you. Same this with virtual goods. You pay, its yours.

    If you purchase WoW with all of the expansions, then the characters you create and the account is your ownership. Blizzard has no right to take them from you with bans or any other means that would result you not having access to the account.

    I can’t believe people defend this. This won’t affect you now, but it might in the future. You invest your money and time towards something you own, as you paid, and then some dumbass gm with a bad day just will take your ownership of the account, without any consequences.

    Blizzard Terms of service are not above the law, when you accept those terms, you are being forced to, because if you decline you wont be able to play.

    Ye ye many companies do same strategies, but perhaps change?
    Incorrect. It works the same way you'd pay to rent a film/something - you pay to use the service and pay you access certain content. That's all. You own zero ownership over the game and your account - you're paying for access, that's all. Blizzards ToS adhere to the law perfectly, seeing as paid lawyers (something which you are clearly not) have made sure they do.

  19. #79
    One thing that I hope becomes a reality when it comes to digital goods/licences, is the ability to resell them. No ideas why this isn't a thing already to be honest!
    Just like with most any other product in this world, if you want to sell it, you can. But for some reason digital keys you don't have that option.

  20. #80
    Quote Originally Posted by Yunru View Post
    Best you can do is to become French citizen and wait for a law that will help you with that. Steam is already in hot water with them.
    steam will simply stop selling to france. Nothing good is coming from this

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •